Literature DB >> 28453692

Safety and antitumor activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent carcinoma of the anal canal.

P A Ott1, S A Piha-Paul2, P Munster3, M J Pishvaian4, E M J van Brummelen5, R B Cohen6, C Gomez-Roca7, S Ejadi8, M Stein9, E Chan10, M Simonelli11, A Morosky12, S Saraf12, K Emancipator12, M Koshiji12, J Bennouna13.   

Abstract

Background: Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab, a humanized programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody, was assessed in KEYNOTE-028, a multicohort, phase Ib trial for patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced solid tumors. We report results for the cohort of patients with advanced anal carcinoma. Patients and methods: Patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (≥1%) received intravenous pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate per investigator review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and response duration. Data cutoff date was 1 July 2015.
Results: Of the 43 patients with advanced anal carcinoma evaluable for PD-L1 expression, 32 (74%) had PD-L1-positive tumors as assessed with the 22C3 prototype assay, of whom 25 were enrolled between April and September 2014. Sixteen patients (64%) experienced treatment-related adverse events; the most common ones were diarrhea and fatigue in four patients (16%) each and nausea in three patients (12%). There were no treatment-related deaths or discontinuations as of the data cutoff date. Among the 24 patients with squamous cell carcinoma histology, four had confirmed partial response, for an overall response rate of 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5%-37%) and 10 (42%) had confirmed stable disease, for a disease control rate of 58%. One additional patient with non-squamous histology had confirmed stable disease.
Conclusion: In this population of patients with PD-L1-positive advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma, pembrolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity. These data support further study of pembrolizumab for this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02054806.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KEYNOTE-028; PD-1; PD-L1; immunotherapy; pembrolizumab; squamous cell advanced anal carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28453692      PMCID: PMC5406758          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


Introduction

Anal carcinoma is a rare cancer type, with an incidence of 1–2 cases/100 000 per year worldwide [1]. Approximately 84% of anal carcinoma is associated with high-risk types of human papilloma virus (HPV), primarily HPV-16 [2]. The standard of care for localized disease is chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin in combination with radiotherapy, which results in a 5-year disease-free survival rate of ∼60% [3-5]. Based on limited data, the standard of care after progression or development of distant metastatic disease is 5-FU and cisplatin, and the 5-year survival rate for these patients is ∼15%; however, if cisplatin-based chemotherapy fails, no other regimens have been shown to be effective [6]. Many cancers evade immune surveillance and destruction through upregulation of the immune cell checkpoint molecule programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Interaction between the programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor, expressed on tumor-infiltrating T cells, and its ligand PD-L1 leads to the functional inactivation of T cells, a mechanism known as adaptive immune resistance [7, 8]. Monoclonal antibodies against PD-1 and PD-L1, including pembrolizumab, nivolumab, and atezolizumab, have demonstrated antitumor activity in a diverse set of tumor types [9-11]. A correlation between pretreatment PD-L1 expression and response to anti-PD-1 therapy has also been reported in multiple tumor types [12-14]. The KEYNOTE-028 study evaluated pembrolizumab monotherapy in 20 different PD-L1-positive advanced or recurrent cancers with significant unmet medical need. Results from the anal carcinoma cohort of KEYNOTE-028 are reported herein.

Methods

Study design and population

KEYNOTE-028 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02054806) is a multicenter, open-label, phase Ib trial in 20 cohorts of patients with PD-L1-positive advanced solid tumors. Patients in the anal carcinoma cohort were enrolled at 12 investigational sites in Europe and the USA. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the anal canal, failure of prior standard therapy, and tumor PD-L1 positivity. Other eligibility requirements were age ≥18 years, measurable disease based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function as established by laboratory testing conducted <10 days before the first pembrolizumab dose. Key exclusion criteria included diagnosis of immunodeficiency or systemic steroid therapy <7 days before the first pembrolizumab dose, active autoimmune disease, interstitial lung disease, active brain metastases (metastases stable for ≥4 weeks before the first pembrolizumab dose were permitted), and previous therapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. The study protocol and all amendments were approved by the institutional review boards or ethics committees of all participating sites. All patients provided written informed consent.

Treatment and assessments

Pembrolizumab was given intravenously at 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/investigator decision. Response was assessed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 8 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study and for 30 days after the end of treatment (90 days for serious AEs) and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. AEs of special interest were defined as events with potentially drug-related immunologic causes. An archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sample or a newly obtained biopsy specimen was assessed at a central laboratory for PD-L1 expression at screening with a laboratory-developed prototype immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay (QualTek Molecular Laboratories, Goleta, CA) [15] using the 22C3 antibody (Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ). PD-L1 positivity was defined as membrane staining of ≥1% of scorable cells, including both neoplastic cells and contiguous mononuclear inflammatory cells, or the presence of a distinctive interface pattern.

Outcomes

Primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate (ORR). ORR was determined by investigator assessment and defined as the proportion of patients having confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1 at any time during the study. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from enrollment to the first documented instance of disease progression according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurred first; overall survival (OS), defined as time from enrollment to death from any cause; and duration of response (DOR), defined as time from the first RECIST v1.1-based response to disease progression in patients who experienced PR or better.

Statistical analysis

The binomial exact method was used for power and sample size calculations. A sample size of 22 assessable patients in this cohort was calculated to provide 80% power to demonstrate that the best ORR exceeded 10% at an overall one-sided 8% alpha-level if the true ORR within the cohort was 35%. Efficacy was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab and had measurable disease at baseline according to RECIST v1.1. Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab. The truncated sequential probability test was used for evaluation of ORR. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate PFS, OS, and DOR. The data cutoff date for this report was 1 July 2015.

Results

Baseline patient characteristics

Of 43 patients screened for PD-L1 expression, 32 (74%) had PD-L1-positive tumors as assessed with the prototype IHC assay. Four of these patients did not meet eligibility criteria, three were excluded after the enrollment limit was reached, and the other 25 were enrolled between April and September 2014. Median age was 63 years (range 46–82 years), 23 patients (92%) were women, and the majority (96%) had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (Table 1). One patient with non-SCC histology (perineal epidermoid carcinoma) was enrolled as a protocol violation. Most patients were pretreated, with 13 (52%) having received ≥2 prior treatments for advanced disease. Although three (12%) patients did not receive prior treatment of advanced disease, they experienced disease progression shortly after receiving adjuvant and/or (neo)adjuvant treatment.
Table 1

Patient baseline characteristics

CharacteristicN = 25
Median age, years  (range)63  (46–82)
Sex
   Male2  (8)
   Female23  (92)
Race
   White19  (76)
   Black or African American1  (4)
   Not specified5  (20)
ECOG performance status
   05  (20)
   120  (80)
Histology at baseline
   SCC24  (96)
   Perineal epidermoid carcinomaa1  (4)
Adjuvant or neoadjuvant systemic therapy6  (24)
Prior radiation18  (72)
Prior lines of therapy for advanced disease
   0b3  (12)
   17  (28)
   26  (24)
  ≥37  (28)
   Unknown2  (8)
Prior therapies for advanced diseasec
   5-FU + mitomycin15  (60)
   5-FU ± platinum ± other12  (48)
   Gemcitabine + platinum ± other4  (16)
   Chk-1 inhibitor2  (8)
   Etirinotecan pegol2  (8)
   Other10  (40)

Data are presented as n  (%) unless indicated otherwise.

Protocol violation.

Although these three patients did not receive prior treatment for advanced disease, they had disease progression shortly after receiving adjuvant and/or  (neo)adjuvant treatment.

Patients could have received >1 prior therapy.

5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; Chk-1, checkpoint kinase 1; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Patient baseline characteristics Data are presented as n  (%) unless indicated otherwise. Protocol violation. Although these three patients did not receive prior treatment for advanced disease, they had disease progression shortly after receiving adjuvant and/or  (neo)adjuvant treatment. Patients could have received >1 prior therapy. 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; Chk-1, checkpoint kinase 1; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Safety

As of the data cutoff date, median follow-up duration was 10.6 months (range 0.3–15.0 months) and median duration of therapy was 92 days (range 1–449 days). Sixteen patients (64%) experienced treatment-related AEs (Table 2), most commonly diarrhea, fatigue (n = 4 each; 16%), and nausea (n = 3; 12%). There were four grade 3 treatment-related AEs, including increased blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level and general physical health deterioration (n = 1 each), and colitis and diarrhea in the same patient. No grade 4 or higher treatment-related AEs were seen. Treatment-related AEs of special interest occurred in three patients (12%): grade 2 hypothyroidism in two patients and grade 3 colitis in one patient. One additional patient experienced grade 2 hypothyroidism not considered by the investigator to be related to treatment and grade 3 treatment-related increased TSH, which was not included as a term in the analysis of AEs of special interest.
Table 2

Treatment-related adverse events

Any-grade adverse events occurring in ≥ 2 patients, n (%)N = 25
 Diarrhea4 (16)
 Fatigue4 (16)
 Nausea3 (12)
 Dry mouth2 (8)
 Hypersensitivity2 (8)
 Hypothyroidism2 (8)
 Night sweats2 (8)
 Stomatitis2 (8)
 Thrombocytopenia2 (8)
 Vomiting2 (8)
Grade 3- -4 adverse events occurring in ≥ 1 patient, n (%)
 Colitis (grade 3)a1 (4)
 Diarrhea (grade 3)a1 (4)
 General physical health deterioration (grade 3)1 (4)
 Increased blood thyroid stimulating hormone (grade 3)1 (4)

Occurred in the same patient.

Treatment-related adverse events Occurred in the same patient. Of 25 enrolled patients, one patient discontinued therapy because of toxicity before the first postbaseline response evaluation (grade 5 intestinal perforation unrelated to pembrolizumab treatment). There were no treatment-related study discontinuations or deaths as of the data cutoff date.

Clinical activity

By investigator review, ORR was 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0%–37%] among the 24 patients with SCC histology, and all four patients had confirmed PR (Table 3). Ten patients (42%) had confirmed stable disease (SD) with a median duration of 3.6 months (range 1.8+ to 11+ months). The disease control rate was 58% (14 of 24 patients). The one patient with non-SCC histology (perineal epidermoid carcinoma) had confirmed SD at 9 weeks and unconfirmed PR as of the data cutoff date and was subsequently lost to follow-up. All five responders, regardless of histology, had received prior therapy for advanced disease.
Table 3

Best overall response in patients with SCC histology (N = 24)

Best responsean%95% CI
Complete response000–14
Partial response4175–37
Stable disease104222–63
Progressive disease93819–59
Not assessedb140–21

All responses are confirmed.

Patient discontinued therapy because of toxicity before the first post-baseline response assessment.

CI, confidence interval; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Best overall response in patients with SCC histology (N = 24) All responses are confirmed. Patient discontinued therapy because of toxicity before the first post-baseline response assessment. CI, confidence interval; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma. Overall, nine (38%) of 24 assessable patients had a decrease from baseline in the size of their target lesions (Figure 1A), which was maintained over several assessments (Figure 1B). Among the five patients with a response, regardless of histology, median time to response was 3.6 months (range 1.6–4.8 months), and median DOR was not reached (range <0.1+ to 9.2+ months). At the time of analysis, two of the four responses in patients with SCC histology were ongoing (Figure 1C) and were sustained for longer than 9 months (see supplementary materials, available at Annals of Oncology online, for additional details on these two patients). Two patients with SD also remained on treatment as of the data cutoff date.
Figure 1.

(A) Maximum change from baseline in tumor size. Includes patients with ≥1 postbaseline tumor assessment (n = 24). Responders were defined as patients having confirmed complete response or partial response per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review. (B) Longitudinal change from baseline in tumor size. Includes patients with ≥1 postbaseline tumor assessment (n = 24). Responders were defined as patients having confirmed complete response or partial response per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review. (C) Treatment exposure and response duration. The length of each bar represents the time to the last radiographic assessment. Both confirmed and unconfirmed responses per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review are shown.

(A) Maximum change from baseline in tumor size. Includes patients with ≥1 postbaseline tumor assessment (n = 24). Responders were defined as patients having confirmed complete response or partial response per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review. (B) Longitudinal change from baseline in tumor size. Includes patients with ≥1 postbaseline tumor assessment (n = 24). Responders were defined as patients having confirmed complete response or partial response per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review. (C) Treatment exposure and response duration. The length of each bar represents the time to the last radiographic assessment. Both confirmed and unconfirmed responses per RECIST v1.1 by investigator review are shown. Median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI 1.7–7.3 months), and 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 31.6% and 19.7%, respectively (supplementary Figure S1A, available at Annals of Oncology online). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.9 months to not available), and the 6- and 12-month OS rates were 64.5% and 47.6%, respectively (supplementary Figure S1B, available at Annals of Oncology online).

Discussion

Because PD-L1 expression is associated with higher antitumor activity of PD-1 blockade in other tumor types [12-14], PD-L1 positivity was used as a selection criterion in this study to potentially enrich for patients most likely to respond to pembrolizumab. In this population of mostly pretreated patients with PD-L1-positive advanced anal carcinoma, pembrolizumab demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging antitumor activity, with an ORR of 17% in those patients with SCC histology (4 of 24 patients). To our knowledge, this study represents the first published manuscript describing immune checkpoint blockade in patients with previously treated advanced anal carcinoma. PD-L1 positivity, which had not been previously defined in anal cancer, was found to be high (74% of screened patients) in this study. The high rate of PD-L1 expression in anal cancer may not be surprising given the immune responses against the HPV E7 oncoprotein identified previously in this tumor type [16]. High frequencies of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and inflammatory responses have been identified in virally driven cancers and have been linked with upregulation of PD-L1 in HPV-associated head and neck cancer [17-19]. This upregulation of PD-L1 is mediated by interferon-γ secreted by T cells and has been termed ‘adaptive immune resistance’ [8, 20]. HPV status was not collected in this study and was only available for three of the enrolled patients (two responders and one non-responder), all of whom were HPV positive. The number of patients in this study with known HPV status was too small to determine an association with pembrolizumab activity. Similar to the results of other immune checkpoint inhibitors in various tumor types [11-13], only a subset of patients with PD-L1-positive tumors in this study experienced clinical benefit, suggesting that other biomarkers should be explored for the ability to predict antitumor activity of pembrolizumab. Immune gene signatures were shown to correlate with response to PD-1 blockade in several other solid tumor types [21-23], and an association between tumor infiltration of CD8+ and CD3+ T cells with response to PD-1 inhibition was reported with another anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients with SCC anal carcinoma [24]. Mutational load has been reported to correlate with response to immune checkpoint blockade in other cancers including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and colorectal cancer, and may be relevant in advanced anal carcinoma as well [25-28]. Although the mutational rate of anal cancer has not been assessed comprehensively, it has been reported to be in the intermediate range, along with other HPV-associated cancers such as head and neck and cervical cancer [29-31]. In conclusion, pembrolizumab demonstrated manageable safety and encouraging antitumor activity in patients with PD-L1-positive advanced SCC anal carcinoma. Further evaluation of PD-1 blockade, alone or in combination with a partnering agent, in this patient population and of potential biomarkers is warranted. Click here for additional data file.
  26 in total

1.  Comprehensive genomic profiling of anal squamous cell carcinoma reveals distinct genomically defined classes.

Authors:  J H Chung; E Sanford; A Johnson; S J Klempner; A B Schrock; N A Palma; R L Erlich; G M Frampton; Z R Chalmers; J Vergilio; D A Rubinson; J X Sun; J Chmielecki; R Yelensky; J H Suh; D Lipson; T J George; J A Elvin; P J Stephens; V A Miller; J S Ross; S M Ali
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Melanoma-intrinsic β-catenin signalling prevents anti-tumour immunity.

Authors:  Stefani Spranger; Riyue Bao; Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Landscape of genomic alterations in cervical carcinomas.

Authors:  Akinyemi I Ojesina; Lee Lichtenstein; Samuel S Freeman; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Ivan Imaz-Rosshandler; Trevor J Pugh; Andrew D Cherniack; Lauren Ambrogio; Kristian Cibulskis; Bjørn Bertelsen; Sandra Romero-Cordoba; Victor Treviño; Karla Vazquez-Santillan; Alberto Salido Guadarrama; Alexi A Wright; Mara W Rosenberg; Fujiko Duke; Bethany Kaplan; Rui Wang; Elizabeth Nickerson; Heather M Walline; Michael S Lawrence; Chip Stewart; Scott L Carter; Aaron McKenna; Iram P Rodriguez-Sanchez; Magali Espinosa-Castilla; Kathrine Woie; Line Bjorge; Elisabeth Wik; Mari K Halle; Erling A Hoivik; Camilla Krakstad; Nayeli Belem Gabiño; Gabriela Sofia Gómez-Macías; Lezmes D Valdez-Chapa; María Lourdes Garza-Rodríguez; German Maytorena; Jorge Vazquez; Carlos Rodea; Adrian Cravioto; Maria L Cortes; Heidi Greulich; Christopher P Crum; Donna S Neuberg; Alfredo Hidalgo-Miranda; Claudia Rangel Escareno; Lars A Akslen; Thomas E Carey; Olav K Vintermyr; Stacey B Gabriel; Hugo A Barrera-Saldaña; Jorge Melendez-Zajgla; Gad Getz; Helga B Salvesen; Matthew Meyerson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Development of a Prototype Immunohistochemistry Assay to Measure Programmed Death Ligand-1 Expression in Tumor Tissue.

Authors:  Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Darren Locke; Tiffany Murphy; Frank Lynch; Jennifer H Yearley; Dennis Frisman; Robert Pierce; Russell Weiner; Dianna Wu; Kenneth Emancipator
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Fluorouracil, mitomycin, and radiotherapy vs fluorouracil, cisplatin, and radiotherapy for carcinoma of the anal canal: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; Kathryn A Winter; Leonard L Gunderson; John Pedersen; Al B Benson; Charles R Thomas; Robert J Mayer; Michael G Haddock; Tyvin A Rich; Christopher Willett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hugo De Vuyst; Gary M Clifford; Maria Claudia Nascimento; Margaret M Madeleine; Silvia Franceschi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  The epidemiology of anal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew E Grulich; I Mary Poynten; Dorothy A Machalek; Fengyi Jin; David J Templeton; Richard J Hillman
Journal:  Sex Health       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.706

10.  Distinct patterns of intratumoral immune cell infiltrates in patients with HPV-associated compared to non-virally induced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Simona Partlová; Jan Bouček; Kamila Kloudová; Eva Lukešová; Michal Zábrodský; Marek Grega; Jitka Fučíková; Iva Truxová; Ruth Tachezy; Radek Špíšek; Anna Fialová
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.110

View more
  70 in total

Review 1.  Cautious optimism-the current role of immunotherapy in gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  S Mendis; S Gill
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Trial watch: Immune checkpoint blockers for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Claire Vanpouille-Box; Claire Lhuillier; Lucillia Bezu; Fernando Aranda; Takahiro Yamazaki; Oliver Kepp; Jitka Fucikova; Radek Spisek; Sandra Demaria; Silvia C Formenti; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 8.110

3.  Hellenic society of medical oncology (HESMO) guidelines for the management of anal cancer.

Authors:  Nikolaos Gouvas; Sophia Gourtsoyianni; Maria Angeliki Kalogeridi; John Sougklakos; Louisa Vini; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-11-24

4.  Genetic Profile and Functional Proteomics of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Proposal for a Molecular Classification.

Authors:  Lucía Trilla-Fuertes; Ismael Ghanem; Angelo Gámez-Pozo; Joan Maurel; Laura G-Pastrián; Marta Mendiola; Cristina Peña; Rocío López-Vacas; Guillermo Prado-Vázquez; Elena López-Camacho; Andrea Zapater-Moros; Victoria Heredia; Miriam Cuatrecasas; Pilar García-Alfonso; Jaume Capdevila; Carles Conill; Rocío García-Carbonero; Ricardo Ramos-Ruiz; Claudia Fortes; Carlos Llorens; Paolo Nanni; Juan Ángel Fresno Vara; Jaime Feliu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Chemoradiation-Related Lymphopenia and Its Association with Survival in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal.

Authors:  Grace Lee; Daniel W Kim; Vinayak Muralidhar; Devarati Mitra; Nora K Horick; Christine E Eyler; Theodore S Hong; Lorraine C Drapek; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Bruce Giantonio; Aparna R Parikh; David P Ryan; Jeffrey W Clark; Jennifer Y Wo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-12

Review 6.  Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibodies in People Living with HIV and Cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn Lurain; Ramya Ramaswami; Robert Yarchoan; Thomas S Uldrick
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 7.  Systemic Therapies for Advanced Squamous Cell Anal Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Sclafani; Sheela Rao
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  FOLFCIS Treatment and Genomic Correlates of Response in Advanced Anal Squamous Cell Cancer.

Authors:  Sebastian Mondaca; Walid K Chatila; David Bates; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Andrea Cercek; Neil H Segal; Zsofia K Stadler; Anna M Varghese; Ritika Kundra; Marinela Capanu; Jinru Shia; Nikolaus Schultz; Leonard Saltz; Rona Yaeger
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 9.  [Anal dysplasia and anal cancer].

Authors:  Ulrike Wieland; Frank Oellig; Alexander Kreuter
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 0.751

10.  Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  K C Wilson; M P Flood; D Oh; N Calvin; M Michael; R G Ramsay; A G Heriot
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.