Literature DB >> 28452670

A Peer Mentorship Program for Mental Health Professionals in Veterans Health Administration Home-Based Primary Care.

Danielle L Terry1, B Heath Gordon2, Pamela Steadman-Wood3, Michele J Karel4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Mental health professionals working in integrated, interdisciplinary primary or geriatric care settings may have limited training for this growing model of care. Peer mentorship is one avenue of professional development support. We describe the development and evaluation of a peer mentorship program for mental health professionals working within Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Home Based Primary Care (HBPC) programs.
METHODS: Electronic surveys were administered to 57 peer mentorship pairs matched for program participation. The survey examined program utilization characteristics, nature of peer contact, and benefits and challenges reported by participants.
RESULTS: Overall, mentor and mentee respondents (N = 58) cited numerous benefits of engaging in the program. Mentees reported their peer mentorship relationships provided acceptance, support, encouragement and positive role modeling.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest peer mentoring can be an important professional resource to offer mental health professionals new to working in integrated, geriatric care settings. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Mental health professionals new to working in geriatric and/or integrated care settings may have limited training to meet specialized needs of patients, families, and interdisciplinary care teams. Peer mentorship following formal academic training may be an important option for professional development, supporting enhanced competence and, ultimately, improved patient care and team functioning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geropsychology; home-based care; integrated care; mentorship; professional development

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28452670     DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2016.1255691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gerontol        ISSN: 0731-7115            Impact factor:   2.619


  1 in total

1.  Are We Doing a Good Job? In Praise of Program Evaluation.

Authors:  Jennifer Moye
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.619

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.