Literature DB >> 28452571

Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and enhanced T1-weighted sequencing in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Amin Abolhasani Foroughi1, Roohollah Salahi1, Alireza Nikseresht2, Hora Heidari2, Masoume Nazeri2, Ali Khorsand1.   

Abstract

Introduction The purpose of this study was to assess whether demographic, brain anatomical regions and contrast enhancement show differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with increased diffusion lesions (ID group) compared with diffusion restriction (DR group). Method MRI protocol comprised T1- and T2-weighted sequences with and without gadolinium (Gd), and sagittal three-dimensional FLAIR sequence, DWI and ADC maps were prospectively performed in 126 MS patients from January to December 2015. The investigation was conducted to evaluate differences in demographic, cord and brain regional, technical, and positive or negative Gd contrast imaging parameters in two groups of ID and DR. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS. Results A total of 9.6% of patients showed DR. In the DR group, 66.6% of the patients showed contrast enhancement of plaques, whereas 29.2% of the IR group showed enhancement of plaques. The most prevalent group was non-enhanced plaques in the ID group, followed by Gd-enhanced plaques in the ID group. Patients in the ID group (90.4%) were significantly more than in the DR group (9.6%). Out of the 40 patients with Gd-enhanced plaques, 80.5% was from the ID group and 19.5% from the DR group. Conclusion MRI of the brain, unlike of the cord, with Gd demonstrates significant difference in enhancement between the two groups ( p < 0.05). No significant difference was seen in demographic, cord and brain regional, and technical parameters, EDSS, disease duration, and attack rate as well as demographic and regional parameters between the ID and decrease diffusion groups ( p > 0.05).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple sclerosis; diffusion restriction; diffusion-weighted imaging; increased diffusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28452571      PMCID: PMC5524272          DOI: 10.1177/1971400916678224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiol J        ISSN: 1971-4009


  29 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in multiple sclerosis: comparison with contrast-enhanced study.

Authors:  K Tsuchiya; J Hachiya; T Maehara
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  M A Horsfield; M Lai; S L Webb; G J Barker; P S Tofts; R Turner; P Rudge; D H Miller
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  F D Lublin; S C Reingold
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Acute demyelinating lesions with restricted diffusion in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Konstantin E Balashov; Eric Lindzen
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H B Larsson; C Thomsen; J Frederiksen; M Stubgaard; O Henriksen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Acute multiple sclerosis lesion: conversion of restricted diffusion due to vasogenic edema.

Authors:  Konstantin E Balashov; Latt Latt Aung; Suhayl Dhib-Jalbut; Irwin A Keller
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  In vivo noninvasive determination of abnormal water diffusion in the rat brain studied in an animal model for multiple sclerosis by diffusion-weighted NMR imaging.

Authors:  M R Verhoye; E J Gravenmade; E R Raman; J Van Reempts; A Van der Linden
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  New imaging techniques in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Yan Fu; Thomas M Talavage; Ji-Xin Cheng
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2008-09

9.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Assessing the correlation between grey and white matter damage with motor and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Emilia Sbardella; Nikolaos Petsas; Francesca Tona; Luca Prosperini; Eytan Raz; Gianvito Pace; Carlo Pozzilli; Patrizia Pantano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current and Future Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jennifer Yang; Maysa Hamade; Qi Wu; Qin Wang; Robert Axtell; Shailendra Giri; Yang Mao-Draayer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Multiple sclerosis: prevalence of the 'central vein' sign in white matter lesions on gadolinium-enhanced susceptibility-weighted images.

Authors:  Gianvincenzo Sparacia; Francesco Agnello; Alberto Iaia; Aurelia Banco; Massimo Galia; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-04-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.