Literature DB >> 28452170

Trends in the surgical management of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma: findings from a population-based study.

Victoria White1, David J T Marco1,2, Damien Bolton3, Ian Douglas Davis4,5, Michael Jefford6,7, David Hill1,2, Henry Miles Prince6,7, Jeremy L Millar8, Ingrid M Winship9, Michael Coory2, Graham G Giles1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the use of nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for treatment of stage 1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) changed between 2009 and the end of 2013 in Australia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adult cases of RCC diagnosed in 2009, 2012 and 2013 were identified through the population-based Victorian Cancer Registry. For each identified patient, trained data-abstractors attended treating hospitals or clinician rooms to extract tumour and treatment data through medical record review. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to examine the significance of change in use of NSS over time, after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 1 836 patients with RCC were identified. Of these, the proportion of cases with stage 1 tumours was 64% in 2009, 66% in 2012 and 69% in 2013. For T1a tumours, the proportion of patients residing in metropolitan areas receiving NSS increased from 43% in 2009 to 58% in 2012 (P < 0.05), and 69% in 2013 (P < 0.05). For patients residing in non-metropolitan areas, the proportion receiving NSS increased from 27% in 2009 to 49% in 2012, and 61% in 2013 (P < 0.01). Univariable logistic regression showed patients with moderate (odds ratio [OR] 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.94) or severe comorbidities (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.33-0.99), residing in non-metropolitan areas (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.90), were less likely to be treated by NSS, while those attending high-volume hospitals (≥30 cases/year: OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.21-2.65) and those with higher socio-economic status (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02-2.07) were more likely to be treated by NSS. In multivariable analyses, patients with T1a tumours in 2012 (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.34-2.97) and 2013 (OR 3.15, 95% CI 2.13-4.68) were more likely to be treated by NSS than those in 2009. For T1b tumours, use of NSS increased from 8% in 2009 to 20% in 2013 (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This population-based study of the management of T1 renal tumours in Australia found that the use of NSS increased over the period 2009 to 2013. Between 2009 and 2013 clinical practice for the treatment of small renal tumours in Australia has increasingly conformed to international guidelines.
© 2017 The Authors BJU International © 2017 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nephron-sparing surgery; patterns of care; population-based; radical nephrectomy; renal cancer; surgical treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28452170     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Trend of Surgical Treatment of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ramzi B Jabaji; Heidi Fischer; Tyler Kern; Gary W Chien
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

2.  End-Stage Kidney Disease following Surgical Management of Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Robert J Ellis; Daniel P Edey; Sharon J Del Vecchio; Megan McStea; Scott B Campbell; Carmel M Hawley; David W Johnson; Christudas Morais; Susan J Jordan; Ross S Francis; Simon T Wood; Glenda C Gobe
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Local ablation vs partial nephrectomy in T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Yan He; Chang Liu; Xiaoyuan Qian; Zhixian Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Variability in surgical management of kidney cancer between urban and rural hospitals in Queensland, Australia: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Megan K Forbes; Evan P Owens; Simon T Wood; Glenda C Gobe; Robert J Ellis
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

5.  Cause-Specific Mortality Among Survivors From T1N0M0 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhixian Wang; Jing Wang; Yunpeng Zhu; Chang Liu; Xing Li; Xiaoyong Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  A Simple Clinical Tool for Stratifying Risk of Clinically Significant CKD after Nephrectomy: Development and Multinational Validation.

Authors:  Robert J Ellis; Sharon J Del Vecchio; Kevin M J Gallagher; Danielle N Aliano; Neil Barber; Damien M Bolton; Etienne T S Chew; Jeff S Coombes; Michael D Coory; Ian D Davis; James F Donaldson; Ross S Francis; Graham G Giles; Glenda C Gobe; Carmel M Hawley; David W Johnson; Alexander Laird; Steve Leung; Manar Malki; David J T Marco; Alan S McNeill; Rachel E Neale; Keng L Ng; Simon Phipps; Grant D Stewart; Victoria M White; Simon T Wood; Susan J Jordan
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Analysis of surgical and histopathological results of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with use of three or four robotic arms: an early series results.

Authors:  Lucas Schulze; Victor Teixeira Dubeux; José C A Milfont; Gustavo Peçanha; Pedro Ferrer; Andre Guilherme Cavalcanti
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.