Literature DB >> 28451736

Programming of left hand exploits task set but that of right hand depends on recent history.

Rixin Tang1,2, Hong Zhu3.   

Abstract

There are many differences between the left hand and the right hand. But it is not clear if there is a difference in programming between left hand and right hand when the hands perform the same movement. In current study, we carried out two experiments to investigate whether the programming of two hands was equivalent or they exploited different strategies. In the first experiment, participants were required to use one hand to grasp an object with visual feedback or to point to the center of one object without visual feedback on alternate trials, or to grasp an object without visual feedback and to point the center of one object with visual feedback on alternating trials. They then performed the tasks with the other hand. The result was that previous pointing task affected current grasping when it was performed by the left hand, but not the right hand. In experiment 2, we studied if the programming of the left (or right) hand would be affected by the pointing task performed on the previous trial not only by the same hand, but also by the right (or left) hand. Participants pointed and grasped the objects alternately with two hands. The result was similar with Experiment 1, i.e., left-hand grasping was affected by right-hand pointing, whereas right-hand grasping was immune from the interference from left hand. Taken together, the results suggest that when open- and closed-loop trials are interleaved, motor programming of grasping with the right hand was affected by the nature of the online feedback on the previous trial only if it was a grasping trial, suggesting that the trial-to-trial transfer depends on sensorimotor memory and not on task set. In contrast, motor programming of grasping with the left hand can use information about the nature of the online feedback on the previous trial to specify the parameters of the movement, even when the type of movement that occurred was quite different (i.e., pointing) and was performed with the right hand. This suggests that trial-to-trial transfer with the left hand depends on some sort of carry-over of task set for dealing with the availability of visual feedback.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grasping; Programming; Sensorimotor memory; Trial history; Visual feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28451736     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4964-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  Manual asymmetries in reaching movement control. I: Study of right-handers.

Authors:  P Boulinguez; V Nougier; J L Velay
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 2.  Control and interference in task switching--a review.

Authors:  Andrea Kiesel; Marco Steinhauser; Mike Wendt; Michael Falkenstein; Kerstin Jost; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Parental and perinatal factors influencing the development of handedness in captive chimpanzees.

Authors:  William D Hopkins; Michael J Wesley; Jamie L Russell; Steven J Schapiro
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand.

Authors:  C L R Gonzalez; T Ganel; R L Whitwell; B Morrissey; M A Goodale
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness.

Authors:  Claudia L R Gonzalez; Tzvi Ganel; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Specialized channels for cognitive responses.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1981 Aug-Dec

8.  The effect of viewing the moving limb and target object during the early phase of movement on the online control of grasping.

Authors:  Takao Fukui; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Neuroanatomical correlates of handedness for tool use in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): implication for theories on the evolution of language.

Authors:  William D Hopkins; Jamie L Russell; Claudio Cantalupo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-11

10.  Grip morphology and hand use in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence of a left hemisphere specialization in motor skill.

Authors:  William D Hopkins; Claudio Cantalupo; Michael J Wesley; Autumn B Hostetter; Dawn L Pilcher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2002-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  How long is the interval over which trial-to-trial effects on Fitts' Law task can operate?

Authors:  Bingyao Shen; Qianqian Liu; Aixia Song; Xuan Wang; Rixin Tang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot.

Authors:  Yuqi Liu; James Caracoglia; Sriparna Sen; Erez Freud; Ella Striem-Amit
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.