| Literature DB >> 28451559 |
Leila Fallahzadeh-Abarghooei1, Maryam Samadaei-Ghadikolaie1, Iraj Saadat1, Mostafa Saadat1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sodium arsenite (NaAsO2) has potent cytotoxic activity in human cancer cells. Oxidative stress has been suggested as a mechanism for arsenic-induced carcinogenesis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the alteration of mRNA levels of catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) in MCF-7 and Jurkat cells after exposure to NaAsO2.Entities:
Keywords: Catalase; Jurkat cells; MCF-7 cells; N-acetyl-cysteine; SOD2; Sodium arsenite; mRNA
Year: 2017 PMID: 28451559 PMCID: PMC5402782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Primer sets used for real-time PCR
| F | 5′-CGAGCACAGAGCCTCGCCTT-3′ | |
| R | 5′-ACATGCCGGAGCCGTTGTCG-3′ | |
| F | 5′-GGATCCCGCCAGCGACCAGA-3′ | |
| R | 5′-ACCCACGAGGGTCCCGAACTG-3′ | |
| F | 5′-CTGCTGGGGATTGATGTGTGG-3′ | |
| R | 5′-TGCAAGCCATGTATCTTTCAGT-3 |
Fig. 1:Relationship between sodium arsenite concentrations and percent of cell growth inhibition
Expression level of CAT in MCF-7 and Jurkat cells after exposed to NaAsO2 and NaAsO2 plus N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
| NaAsO2 (5 μM) | 0.53 | 0.03 | 19.69 | 2 | 0.003 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) | 0.26 | 0.04 | 24.86 | 2 | 0.002 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) + NAC | 0.43 | 0.04 | 4.26 | 4 | 0.013 |
| NaAsO2 (5 μM) | 0.53 | 0.16 | 4.08 | 2 | 0.055 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) | 0.45 | 0.16 | 4.77 | 2 | 0.041 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) + NAC | 0.96 | 0.11 | 3.67 | 4 | 0.021 |
The fold change of the expressions compared to control untreated cells
Expression level of SOD2 in MCF-7 and Jurkat cells after exposed to NaAsO2 and NaAsO2 plus N-acetylcysteine (NAC)
| NaAsO2 (5 μM) | 1.60 | 0.04 | 28.82 | 2 | 0.001 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) | 1.87 | 0.05 | 27.25 | 2 | 0.001 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) + NAC | 0.89 | 0.06 | 19.91 | 4 | <0.001 |
| NaAsO2 (5 μM) | 0.38 | 0.13 | 6.67 | 2 | 0.022 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) | 0.28 | 0.02 | 41.57 | 2 | 0.001 |
| NaAsO2 (15 μM) + NAC | 0.56 | 0.10 | 3.87 | 4 | 0.018 |
The fold change of the expressions compared to control untreated cells