| Literature DB >> 28451085 |
Mehrnoush Toufan1, Leili Pourafkari1,2, Leila Ghahremani Nasab1, Ali Esfahani3, Zohreh Sanaat3, Alireza Nikanfar3, Nader D Nader2.
Abstract
Introduction: Two-dimensional (2D) strain echocardiography has emerged as a novel method for early diagnosis of myocardial dysfunction in patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy. Certain myocardial segments might be more vulnerable for development of dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: Anthracycline; Breast Cancer; Strain Echocardiography
Year: 2017 PMID: 28451085 PMCID: PMC5402024 DOI: 10.15171/jcvtr.2017.04
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Thorac Res ISSN: 2008-5117
Baseline characteristics of 63 patients with breast cancer who underwent chemotherapya
|
|
|
|
| Hypertension (%) | 14 | 22% |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 7 | 10.90% |
| Age (y) | 63 | 46.6 ± 10.3 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 63 | 116 ± 17 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 63 | 72± 13 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 63 | 26.8 ± 2.8 |
| Mitral inflow E velocity (cm/s) | 63 | 71 ± 17 |
| Mitral inflow A velocity (cm/s) | 63 | 70 ± 12 |
| E/A velocity ratio | 63 | 1.03 ± 0.28 |
| Deceleration time (ms) | 63 | 190 ± 50 |
| Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (mm) | 63 | 21 ± 3 |
| Maximum LA volume index (mL/m2) | 63 | 32.6 ± 12.1 |
| LV end-diastolic volume (mL) | 63 | 87.5 ± 19.7 |
| LV end-systolic volume (mL) | 63 | 34.7 ± 11.4 |
a30 patients had left and 33 patients had right breast cancers.
Figure 1Pair-wise comparison of changes in strain of global and various segments of the left ventricle before and after chemotherapy
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||||||
| Global strain | -19.1 ± 3.3 | -18.5 ± 3.6 | -0.63 | 2.93 | -1.37 | 0.10 | -1.72 | 0.091 |
| Apical cap | -19.7 ± 5.9 | - 19.5 ± 6.1 | -0.22 | 5.17 | -1.52 | 1.08 | -0.34 | 0.734 |
| Apical septal | -20.8 ± 6.3 | -20.5 ± 6.0 | -0.22 | 5.51 | -1.61 | 1.16 | -0.32 | 0.750 |
| Apical anterior | -19.1 ± 7.3 | - 19.1 ± 6.8 | 0.03 | 8.08 | -2.00 | 2.07 | 0.03 | 0.975 |
| Apical lateral | -18.7 ± 6.6 | -18.1 ± 6.2 | -0.60 | 5.89 | -2.09 | 0.88 | -0.81 | 0.420 |
| Apical inferior | -21.2 ± 5.6 | -20.1 ± 6.9 | -1.02 | 5.51 | -2.40 | 0.37 | -1.46 | 0.148 |
| Mid anteroseptal | -18.6 ± 5.9 | -17.3 ± 6.1 | -1.33 | 5.72 | -2.77 | 0.11 | -1.85 | 0.069 |
| Mid anterior | -17.8 ± 7.9 | -15.9 ± 10.7 | -1.86 | 10.13 | -4.41 | 0.70 | -1.45 | 0.151 |
| Mid anterolateral | -17.2 ± 7.4 | -18.2 ± 6.3 | 0.92 | 6.51 | -0.72 | 2.56 | 1.12 | 0.266 |
| Mid inferolateral | -17.1 ± 5.8 | -16.4 ± 7.3 | -0.67 | 7.97 | -2.67 | 1.34 | -0.66 | 0.509 |
| Mid Inferior | -18.0 ± 6.1 | -16.8 ± 7.4 | -1.16 | 8.72 | -3.36 | 1.04 | -1.05 | 0.296 |
| Mid inferoseptal | -19.7± 6.3 | -19.2 ± 6.1 | -0.51 | 6.10 | -2.04 | 1.03 | -0.66 | 0.511 |
| Basal anteroseptal | -16.2 ± 5.4 | -13.5 ± 9.0 | -2.70 | 8.42 | -4.82 | -0.58 | -2.54 | 0.013 |
| Basal anterior | -16.1 ± 8.9 | -14.5 ± 10.4 | -1.62 | 9.99 | -4.13 | 0.90 | -1.29 | 0.203 |
| Basal anterolateral | -18.3 ± 8.5 | -17.5 ± 10.1 | -0.78 | 9.55 | -3.18 | 1.63 | -0.65 | 0.520 |
| Basal inferior | -18.2 ± 9.4 | -16.3 ± 10.7 | -2.14 | 11.85 | -5.13 | 0.84 | -1.44 | 0.156 |
| Basal inferolateral | -17.3 + 8.5 | -15.1 ± 10.5 | -1.98 | 11.55 | -4.89 | 0.92 | -1.36 | 0.178 |
| Basal inferoseptal | -17.9 ± 6.8 | -16.6 ± 9.6 | -1.37 | 8.47 | -3.50 | 0.77 | -1.28 | 0.206 |
Association between significant drop (greater than 10%) in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the presence of significant decrease in longitudinal peak systolic strain (> 15%) measured globally and various regions of the left ventricle
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Global stress ≥15% | 5 (9.6%) | 3 (27.3%) | 3.53 (0.70–17.74) | 0.137 |
| Regional stress ≥ 15% | ||||
| Apical region | 12 (23.1%) | 6 (54.5%) | 4.00 (1.04–15.44) | 0.062 |
| Mid-papillary region | 7 (13.5%) | 3 (27.3%) | 2.41 (0.51–11.33) | 0.360 |
| Basal region | 13 (25.0%) | 4 (36.4%) | 1.71 (0.43–6.81) | 0.469 |
Figure 2Correlation of changes in regional and global strain to changes in left ventricular ejection fraction expressed in percent changes from their respective baseline values
| dEF | dGLs | dAPR | dMPR | dBR | ||
| dEF | Correlation Coefficient (R-Value) | 1.00 | 0.441** | 0.216 | 0.365** | 0.272 |
|
| 0.0003 | 0.0888 | 0.0033 | 0.0309 | ||
| dGLs | Correlation Coefficient (R-Value) | 0.441** | 1.00 | 0.540** | 0.647** | 0.616** |
|
| 0.0003 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| dAPR | Correlation Coefficient (R-Value) | 0.216 | 0.540** | 1.00 | 0.558** | 0.343** |
|
| 0.0888 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0060 | ||
| dMPR | Correlation Coefficient (R-Value) | 0.365* | 0.647** | 0.558** | 1.00 | 0.815** |
|
| 0.0033 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | ||
| dBR | Correlation Coefficient (R-Value) | 0.272 | 0.616** | 0.343** | 0.815** | 1.00 |
|
| 0.0309 | <0.0001 | 0.0060 | <0.0001 |
*Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
**Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (2-tailed).
Abbreviations: dEF: Percent deterioration in left ventricular ejection fraction; dGLs: Percent deterioration of left ventricular global strain; dAPR: Percent deterioration of left ventricular strain in apical region; dMPR: Percent deterioration of left ventricular strain in midpapillary region; dBR: Percent deterioration of left ventricular strain in basal region.