| Literature DB >> 28450909 |
Minmin Zhu1,2, Xiaodi Sun3, Xiaodong Chen3, Hang Xiao4, Manlin Duan1, Jianguo Xu1.
Abstract
The density and properties of ion channels in the injured axon and dorsal root ganglion (DRG)Entities:
Keywords: dorsal root ganglion; gabapentin; high-voltage-activated Ca2+ channel; spinal nerve ligation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28450909 PMCID: PMC5403705 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Withdrawal responses of Ipsi. and Cont. feet following mechanical and thermal stimulation. (A) Mean threshold for withdrawal following Von Frey stimulation with different bending forces. (B) Thresholds of paw withdrawal in response to mechanical stimuli. (C) Mean latencies of thermal withdrawal responses. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. #P<0.05 and ##P<0.01, Pre vs. Pod (paired t-test); *P<0.05 and **P<0.01, Ipsi. foot responses in SNL (n=16) vs. sham group (n=7) (analysis of variance). Pre, pre-operative period; Pod, post-operative days; Ipsi., paw ipsilateral to surgery; Cont., paw contralateral to surgery; PWMT, paw withdrawal mechanical threshold; PAWTL, paw withdrawal time latency; SNL, spinal nerve ligation; sham, sham operation.
Figure 2.HVA calcium channel currents. (A) Inward currents were recorded with the command voltage between-70 and +40 mV with 80-msec intervals and successive increments of 10 mV, as well as a VH of −90 mV. (B) The I–V curve was fit using a Boltzmann equation. The ICa density was the Ca2+ channel current standardized by the membrane capacitance. (C) Inward currents in the same cell were recorded using the same steps of command voltages as in A in the presence of 200 µmol/l CdCl2. HVA, high-voltage activation; ICa, Ca2+ currency; VH, holding potential; I–V, current-voltage, pA/pF, peak current density.
Figure 3.ICa density-voltage associations in control, adjacent and axotomized neurons were examined by the application of 80-msec voltage steps to various test potentials between −70 and +40 mV in 10-mV steps with 5-sec intervals from a holding potential of −90 mV. The ICa of adjacent (104±17 pA/pF; n=5) and axotomized neurons (75±17 pA/pF; n=8) was significantly lower than that of control neurons (144±24 pA/pF; n=7; P<0.05). In addition, the ICa of axotomized neurons was lower than that of adjacent neurons (P<0.05). The activation voltage of ICa in control and adjacent neurons was 0 mV, while that in axotomized neurons was −10 mV. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vs. control neurons. #P<0.05 regarding adjacent vs. axotomized neurons. ICa, Ca2+ density; pA/pF, peak current density; C, control; SNL, spinal nerve ligation; L4, adjacent neurons; L5, axotomized neurons.
Comparison of peak current inhibition rates (%) among the three groups at various gabapentin concentrations.
| Gabapentin concentration (µmol/l) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 0.1 | 1 | 10 | 100 | 300 |
| C (n=7) | 10.8±1.5 | 12.8±1.8 | 15.6±2.1[ | 27.3±2.9[ | 28.1±3.3[ |
| SNL-L4 (n=5) | 10.5±1.6 | 12.2±2.1 | 16.0±1.9[ | 26.9±2.0[ | 27.4±2.3[ |
| SNL-L5 (n=8) | 11.4±1.5 | 12.9±1.0 | 18.5±1.7[ | 32.0±2.6[ | 32.7±2.8[ |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=8).
P<0.05, intragroup comparison between 0.1 and 1 µmol/l
P<0.05, compared with 10 µmol/l of the same group
P<0.05, compared with the C group of the same concentration
P<0.05, compared with the SNL-L4 group at the same concentration. SNL, spinal nerve ligation; L4, adjacent neurons; L5, axotomized neurons; C, control.
Figure 4.(A) Activation. The membrane VH was set at −90 mV, calcium currents were elicited by a series of command voltages ranging from −70 to +40 mV with successive increments of 10 mV with 80-msec intervals. (B) Steady-state inactivation. Ca2+ currents were generated by the membrane VH at −90 mV for 10 msec, immediately followed by a series of command voltages from −70 to +20 mV with successive increments of 10 mV at 500-msec intervals. Subsequently, command voltages of −10 mV were applied at 80-msec intervals. (C) Activation curves were fitted using the Boltzmann equation (control neurons, n=10; adjacent neurons, n=5; axotomized neurons, n=8). A depolarized shift was observed in adjacent and axotomized neurons. Va1/2 of three groups was compared. *P<0.05 vs. control neurons. #P<0.05 regarding axotomized vs. adjacent neurons. (D) Inactivation curves were fitted using the Boltzmann equation (control neurons; n=6; adjacent neurons, n=6; axotomized neurons, n=7). Vi1/2 of three groups was compared. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. C, control; SNL, spinal nerve ligation; VH, holding potential; G, conductance; I, current; L4, adjacent neurons; L5, axotomized neurons.
Figure 5.HVA-Ca2+ current activation and steady-state inactivation curves of control, adjacent and axotomized neurons in the absence or presence of 100 µmol/l GBP. (A) Activation (n=10) and steady-state inactivation (n=6) curves shifted towards a hyperpolarization direction in control neurons, which reduced the ‘window currents’, in the presence of 100 µmol/l GBP. Va1/2 decreased from −16.23±1.92 to −19.69±1.07 mV with GBP added (P<0.05); Vi1/2 was inactivated at −31.93±1.03 mV vs. −38.78±2.05 (P<0.05). (B) A hyperpolarized shift was observed in activation (n=5) and steady-state inactivation (n=6) curves of adjacent neurons; however, ‘window currents’ remained unchanged in the presence of 100 µmol/l GBP. Va1/2 decreased from −18.03±0.37 to −21.73±0.64 mV (P<0.05) with the addition of GBP; Vi1/2 was inactivated at −31.45±1.87 mV vs. −36.22±2.80 mV (P<0.05). (C) Activation (n=8) and steady-state inactivation (n=7) curves in axotomized neurons, showing reduced ‘window currents’ in the presence of 100 µmol/l GBP. Compared without using GBP, after adding GBP, Va1/2 and Vi1/2 decreased from −20.73±0.33 and −32.73±1.37 mV towards −23.94±0.15 mV (P<0.05) and −44.23±2.30 mV (P<0.05). Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. GBP, gabapentin; HVA, high-voltage activation; Va1/2, voltage at the half maximal activation current; Vi1/2, voltage at the half maximal inactivation current; I, current; G, conductance.
Figure 6.Sub-types of HVA-Ca2+ currents identified by application of specific channel blockers. (A) To individually assess various types of calcium channels present in the same cell, 20 µmol/l nifedipine (L-type Ca2+-specific channel blocker), 2 µmol/l ω-conotoxin MVIIC (P/Q-type Ca2+ channel-specific blocker) and 2 µmol/l ω-conotoxin MVIIA (N-type Ca2+ channel-specific blocker) were applied to the bath in sequence when stable currents were reached. (B) Fraction changes of each sub-type (L, N, P/Q) Ca2+ channel current over the total HVA-Ca2+ peak currents in control, adjacent and axotomized neurons. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=10). *P<0.05 vs. control neurons (ANOVA); #P<0.05 regarding axotomized vs. adjacent neurons (ANOVA). HVA, high-voltage activation; ANOVA, analysis of variance; SNL, spinal nerve ligation; L4, adjacent neurons; L5, axotomized neurons.
Sensitive Ca2+ current ratios (%) of each channel sub-type (L, P/Q and N) among the three groups.
| HVA-Ca2+ subtype | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group | L | P/Q | N |
| C | 35.2±4.3 | 43.4±3.5 | 68.8±4.5 |
| SNL-L4 | 34.9±3.7 | 43.6±4.7 | 69.7±3.3 |
| SNL-L5 | 32.5±3.4 | 45.6±4.6 | 81.0±2.8[ |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=10).
P<0.05, compared with the same Ca2+ current sub-type of the C group
P<0.05, compared with the same Ca2+ current sub-type of the SNL-L4 group. SNL, spinal nerve ligation; L4, adjacent neurons; L5, axotomized neurons; C, control.