Literature DB >> 2845089

Characterisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates by restriction endonuclease digestion of chromosomal DNA.

J Z Jordens1, L M Hall.   

Abstract

Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from the London Hospital were characterised by genetic analysis of antibiotic-resistance determinants and by restriction endonuclease digestion of chromosomal DNA and compared with isolates from elsewhere in the UK. Restriction enzyme digestion of chromosomal DNA confirmed that a single strain of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) persists at the London Hospital, although its antibiotic-resistance profile and plasmid carriage are not constant. Methicillin-sensitive isolates, on the other hand, each had readily distinguishable and unique DNA restriction patterns. The DNA restriction digest pattern of the London Hospital MRSA isolates was identical to that of "epidemic" (E) MRSA isolates from the Thames regions. By contrast, other MRSA isolates had DNA restriction patterns which differed from those of EMRSA isolates and from each other. These results confirm the discriminatory value of restriction pattern analysis as a typing method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2845089     DOI: 10.1099/00222615-27-2-117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  19 in total

1.  Clonal analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from intercontinental sources: association of the mec gene with divergent phylogenetic lineages implies dissemination by horizontal transfer and recombination.

Authors:  J M Musser; V Kapur
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Typing of methicillin resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains by ribosomal RNA gene restriction patterns using a biotinylated probe.

Authors:  L Preheim; D Pitcher; R Owen; B Cookson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  G Prevost; B Jaulhac; Y Piemont
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Genome size in bacteria.

Authors:  J T Trevors
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.271

5.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from China characterized by digestion of total DNA with restriction enzymes.

Authors:  L M Hall; J Z Jordens; F Wang
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Distribution of florfenicol resistance genes fexA and cfr among chloramphenicol-resistant Staphylococcus isolates.

Authors:  Corinna Kehrenberg; Stefan Schwarz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Molecular epidemiology for local outbreaks of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The need for several methods.

Authors:  M Sabria-Leal; V H Morthland; M L Pedro-Botet; N Sopena; M Gimenez-Perez; M L Branchini; M A Pfaller
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas cepacia determined by polymerase chain reaction ribotyping.

Authors:  J R Kostman; T D Edlind; J J LiPuma; T L Stull
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Random amplified polymorphic DNA assay is less discriminant than pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P Saulnier; C Bourneix; G Prévost; A Andremont
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of phage typing and DNA fingerprinting by polymerase chain reaction for discrimination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Authors:  A van Belkum; R Bax; P Peerbooms; W H Goessens; N van Leeuwen; W G Quint
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.