Literature DB >> 28450541

Spatial Attention, Motor Intention, and Bayesian Cue Predictability in the Human Brain.

Anna B Kuhns1, Pascasie L Dombert1, Paola Mengotti1, Gereon R Fink1,2, Simone Vossel3,4.   

Abstract

Predictions about upcoming events influence how we perceive and respond to our environment. There is increasing evidence that predictions may be generated based upon previous observations following Bayesian principles, but little is known about the underlying cortical mechanisms and their specificity for different cognitive subsystems. The present study aimed at identifying common and distinct neural signatures of predictive processing in the spatial attentional and motor intentional system. Twenty-three female and male healthy human volunteers performed two probabilistic cueing tasks with either spatial or motor cues while lying in the fMRI scanner. In these tasks, the percentage of cue validity changed unpredictably over time. Trialwise estimates of cue predictability were derived from a Bayesian observer model of behavioral responses. These estimates were included as parametric regressors for analyzing the BOLD time series. Parametric effects of cue predictability in valid and invalid trials were considered to reflect belief updating by precision-weighted prediction errors. The brain areas exhibiting predictability-dependent effects dissociated between the spatial attention and motor intention task, with the right temporoparietal cortex being involved during spatial attention and the left angular gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex during motor intention. Connectivity analyses revealed that all three areas showed predictability-dependent coupling with the right hippocampus. These results suggest that precision-weighted prediction errors of stimulus locations and motor responses are encoded in distinct brain regions, but that crosstalk with the hippocampus may be necessary to integrate new trialwise outcomes in both cognitive systems.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The brain is able to infer the environments' statistical structure and responds strongly to expectancy violations. In the spatial attentional domain, it has been shown that parts of the attentional networks are sensitive to the predictability of stimuli. It remains unknown, however, whether these effects are ubiquitous or if they are specific for different cognitive systems. The present study compared the influence of model-derived cue predictability on brain activity in the spatial attentional and motor intentional system. We identified areas with distinct predictability-dependent activation for spatial attention and motor intention, but also common connectivity changes of these regions with the hippocampus. These findings provide novel insights into the generality and specificity of predictive processing signatures in the human brain.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/375334-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; attentional networks; fMRI; motor preparation; psychophysiological interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28450541      PMCID: PMC6596462          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3255-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  6 in total

Review 1.  Understanding active sampling strategies: Empirical approaches and implications for attention and decision research.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Clinical and neural responses to cognitive behavioral therapy for functional tremor.

Authors:  Alberto J Espay; Scott Ries; Thomas Maloney; Jennifer Vannest; Erin Neefus; Alok K Dwivedi; Jane B Allendorfer; Lawson R Wulsin; W Curt LaFrance; Anthony E Lang; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Integrating modality-specific expectancies for the deployment of spatial attention.

Authors:  Paola Mengotti; Frank Boers; Pascasie L Dombert; Gereon R Fink; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Combined expectancies: the role of expectations for the coding of salient bottom-up signals.

Authors:  Michael Wiesing; Gereon R Fink; Ralph Weidner; Simone Vossel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neural Encoding of the Reliability of Directional Information During the Preparation of Targeted Movements.

Authors:  Charidimos Tzagarakis; Sarah West; Giuseppe Pellizzer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 6.  Where Actions Meet Outcomes: Medial Prefrontal Cortex, Central Thalamus, and the Basal Ganglia.

Authors:  Robert G Mair; Miranda J Francoeur; Erin M Krell; Brett M Gibson
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.617

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.