Literature DB >> 28450313

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus azathioprine in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised clinical trial.

Josep Ordi-Ros1, Luis Sáez-Comet2, Mercedes Pérez-Conesa2, Xavier Vidal3, Francesca Mitjavila4, Antoni Castro Salomó5, Jordi Cuquet Pedragosa6, Vera Ortiz-Santamaria7, Montserrat Mauri Plana8, Josefina Cortés-Hernández1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) versus azathioprine (AZA) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease.
METHODS: A multicentre, 24-month, superiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial (NCT01112215) was conducted with 240 patients (120 per arm) receiving either EC-MPS (target dose: 1440 mg/day) or AZA (target dose: 2 mg/kg/day) in addition to prednisone and/or antimalarials. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission, assessed by SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG), at 3 and 24 months. Secondary endpoints included time to clinical remission, BILAG A and B flare rates, time to flare, corticosteroid reduction and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (clinical SLEDAI=0) was higher in the EC-MPS group at 3 (32.5% vs 19.2%; treatment difference, 13.3 (CI 2.3 to 24), p=0.034) and 24 months (71.2% vs 48.3%; treatment difference, 22.9 (CI 10.4 to 34.4), p<0.001). EC-MPS was superior with respect to time to clinical remission (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.91; p=0.017). BILAG A/B and B flares occurred more frequently in the AZA group (71.7% vs 50%, p=0.001 and 21.67% vs 8.3%, p=0.004, respectively). EC-MPS was superior with respect to time to first BILAG A/B (HR 1.81; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.56; p=0.0004) and BILAG A flare (HR 2.84; 95% CI 1.37 to 5.89; p=0.003). AEs were similar in both groups except for leucopenia that occurred more frequently with AZA.
CONCLUSIONS: EC-MPS was superior to AZA in treating SLE and preventing further relapses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01112215; Results. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcomes research; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28450313     DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  13 in total

Review 1.  Systemic lupus erythematosus: Diagnosis and clinical management.

Authors:  Andrea Fava; Michelle Petri
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 7.094

2.  Time to Lupus Low Disease Activity State in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort: Role of African American Ethnicity.

Authors:  Hakan Babaoğlu; Jessica Li; Daniel Goldman; Laurence S Magder; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) attainment discriminates responders in a systemic lupus erythematosus trial: post-hoc analysis of the Phase IIb MUSE trial of anifrolumab.

Authors:  Eric F Morand; Teodora Trasieva; Anna Berglind; Gabor G Illei; Raj Tummala
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Attainment of treat-to-target endpoints in SLE patients with high disease activity in the atacicept phase 2b ADDRESS II study.

Authors:  Eric F Morand; David A Isenberg; Daniel J Wallace; Amy H Kao; Cristina Vazquez-Mateo; Peter Chang; Kishore Pudota; Cynthia Aranow; Joan T Merrill
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Treatment targets in SLE: remission and low disease activity state.

Authors:  Vera Golder; Michel W P Tsang-A-Sjoe
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.580

6.  Safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous arsenic trioxide in systemic lupus erythematosus: an open-label phase IIa trial (Lupsenic).

Authors:  Mohamed Hamidou; Antoine Néel; Joel Poupon; Zahir Amoura; Mikael Ebbo; Jean Sibilia; Jean-Francois Viallard; Benjamin Gaborit; Christelle Volteau; Jean Benoit Hardouin; Eric Hachulla; François Rieger
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Cora W Hannon; Collette McCourt; Hermenio C Lima; Suephy Chen; Cathy Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-09

8.  Comparative risks of cardiovascular disease events among SLE patients receiving immunosuppressive medications.

Authors:  May Y Choi; Daniel Li; Candace H Feldman; Kazuki Yoshida; Hongshu Guan; Seoyoung C Kim; Brendan M Everett; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Risk of adverse events from different drugs for SLE: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingru Tian; Yien Luo; Haijing Wu; Hai Long; Ming Zhao; Qianjin Lu
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 10.  Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Kathryn P McKeon; Simon H Jiang
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2020-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.