Christopher S Graffeo1, Heather E Leeper2, Avital Perry1, Joon H Uhm3, Daniel J Lachance3, Paul D Brown4, Daniel J Ma4, Jamie J Van Gompel1, Caterina Giannini5, Derek R Johnson6, Aditya Raghunathan7. 1. Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 5. Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 7. Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: graffeo@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atypical meningioma is a World Health Organization grade II tumor with intermediate prognosis and risk of recurrence. Optimal management after gross total resection (GTR) is controversial, with observation versus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) contentiously debated. METHODS: Pathologic review was performed of all atypical meningiomas diagnosed at our institution from 1988 to 2011. Retrospective chart review documented patient demographics, extent of surgical resection, history of radiation therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A supplemental systematic literature review was completed in which English-language articles published since 1979 comparing observation and RT after GTR of atypical meningioma were surveyed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-one underwent observation, and 8 received RT. Overall, 15 observation and 3 patients undergoing RT experienced tumor recurrence (5-year PFS 79% vs. 88%; P = 0.67); 19 observation and 2 patients undergoing RT died (5-year OS 89% vs. 83%; P = 0.68). Systematic review identified 9 preceding studies reporting extractable data comparing observation and RT outcomes after GTR. Recurrence was 18% and 19% after observation and RT (P = 0.9); total survival was 84% and 93% (P = 0.2). At 5 years, PFS was 81% after observation and 88% after RT (P = 0.2), whereas survival was 87% after observation and 96% after RT (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Observation alone after GTR of atypical meningioma was not associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence or mortality. Although some preceding authors advocate for RT based on empiric experience, a systematic review also suggests that observation may provide equivalent PFS and OS to RT. Taken together, these findings indicate that observation after GTR may be a safe alternative to RT.
BACKGROUND:Atypical meningioma is a World Health Organization grade II tumor with intermediate prognosis and risk of recurrence. Optimal management after gross total resection (GTR) is controversial, with observation versus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) contentiously debated. METHODS: Pathologic review was performed of all atypical meningiomas diagnosed at our institution from 1988 to 2011. Retrospective chart review documented patient demographics, extent of surgical resection, history of radiation therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A supplemental systematic literature review was completed in which English-language articles published since 1979 comparing observation and RT after GTR of atypical meningioma were surveyed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-one underwent observation, and 8 received RT. Overall, 15 observation and 3 patients undergoing RT experienced tumor recurrence (5-year PFS 79% vs. 88%; P = 0.67); 19 observation and 2 patients undergoing RT died (5-year OS 89% vs. 83%; P = 0.68). Systematic review identified 9 preceding studies reporting extractable data comparing observation and RT outcomes after GTR. Recurrence was 18% and 19% after observation and RT (P = 0.9); total survival was 84% and 93% (P = 0.2). At 5 years, PFS was 81% after observation and 88% after RT (P = 0.2), whereas survival was 87% after observation and 96% after RT (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Observation alone after GTR of atypical meningioma was not associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence or mortality. Although some preceding authors advocate for RT based on empiric experience, a systematic review also suggests that observation may provide equivalent PFS and OS to RT. Taken together, these findings indicate that observation after GTR may be a safe alternative to RT.
Authors: Rupesh Kotecha; Minesh P Mehta; Eric L Chang; Paul D Brown; John H Suh; Simon S Lo; Sunit Das; Haider H Samawi; Julia Keith; James Perry; Arjun Sahgal Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Hirotaka Hasegawa; Kunal Vakharia; Michael J Link; Scott L Stafford; Paul D Brown; Ian F Parney; Terry C Burns; Elizabeth S Yan; Anita Mahajan; Nadia N Laack; Bruce E Pollock Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Hudin N Jackson; Caroline C Hadley; A Basit Khan; Ron Gadot; James C Bayley; Arya Shetty; Jacob Mandel; Ali Jalali; K Kelly Gallagher; Alex D Sweeney; Arif O Harmanci; Akdes S Harmanci; Tiemo Klisch; Shankar P Gopinath; Ganesh Rao; Daniel Yoshor; Akash J Patel Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Francesco Maiuri; Giuseppe Mariniello; Marcello Barbato; Sergio Corvino; Elia Guadagno; Lorenzo Chiariotti; Marialaura Del Basso De Caro Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Sung Kwon Kim; Hong In Yoon; Wan Soo Yoon; Chul Kee Park; Youn Soo Lee; Ho Shin Gwak; Jin Mo Cho; Jangsup Moon; Kyung Hwan Kim; Se Hoon Kim; Young Il Kim; Young Zoon Kim; Ho Sung Kim; Yun Sik Dho; Jae Sung Park; Ji Eun Park; Youngbeom Seo; Kyoung Su Sung; Jin Ho Song; Chan Woo Wee; Se Hoon Lee; Do Hoon Lim; Jung Ho Im; Jong Hee Chang; Myung Hoon Han; Je Beom Hong; Kihwan Hwang Journal: Brain Tumor Res Treat Date: 2020-04