Literature DB >> 28450086

KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy.

Elena Trisolini1, Elia Armellini2, Alessia Paganotti3, Claudia Veggiani3, Cristina Bozzola1, Milo Frattini4, Corinna Pizio1, Giuseppe Mancuso1, Silvano Andorno5, Renzo Boldorini6.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the procedure of choice for the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses. The specificity of EUS-FNA approaches 100%, but the sensitivity is still low, and the high rate of indeterminate (atypical and suspicious) and false-negative results needs improvement. KRAS gene is frequently mutated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (up to 90%), and mutation analysis of KRAS has been proposed as diagnostic biomarker of PDAC. In most laboratories, KRAS mutation testing is performed by Sanger sequencing or real time-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), but these methods may give false-negative results in routine samples, mainly due to low cellularity. In order to increase the sensitivity of EUS-FNA, we propose a sequential approach for detecting KRAS mutations using mutant enriched-PCR (ME-PCR, sensitivity up to 0.1%) in cytologically indeterminate and negative samples tested wild-type by RT-qPCR. EUS-FNA specimens from 107 patients with pancreatic masses (51 males, 56 females, mean age 67 years) were cytologically examined. According to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines, 50 cases (47%) were classified malignant, 15 (14%) suspicious, 13 (12%) atypical and 10 (9%) negative for malignancy; 18 cases (17%) were non-diagnostic. The overall specificity and sensitivity of cytological examination were 100% and 61%, respectively, when only negative and positive cases were considered; when atypical and suspicious were added to positive cases, the sensitivity increased to 95.1% and the specificity decreased to 85.7%. In all the cases, DNA was extracted from the cell-block and KRAS mutations were investigated by RT-qPCR, followed by ME-PCR in non-amplifiable and negative cases. The overall sensitivity and specificity of KRAS mutation testing alone were 79.3% and 100%; when KRAS mutation testing was performed in indeterminate and negative cytology, the sensitivity increased to 90% with specificity to 100%. Our data indicate that conventional cytology from EUS-FNA samples is highly specific for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Indeterminate and negative cases need to be screened for KRAS mutations; this two-step approach may greatly improve the diagnostic accuracy of this method.
Copyright © 2017 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KRAS; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; cytology; endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration; mutant enriched-PCR; real time-qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28450086     DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2016.12.348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathology        ISSN: 0031-3025            Impact factor:   5.306


  9 in total

1.  Histologic retrieval rate of a newly designed side-bevelled 20G needle for EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Elia Armellini; Erminia Manfrin; Elena Trisolini; Silvano Andorno; Marco Ballarè; Laura Bernardoni; Renzo Luciano Boldorini; Armando Gabbrielli; Luca Frulloni; Alberto Larghi; Pietro Occhipinti; Aldo Scarpa; Stefano Francesco Crinò
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  DNA sequencing of cytopathologically inconclusive EUS-FNA from solid pancreatic lesions suspicious for malignancy confirms EUS diagnosis.

Authors:  Julie Isabelle Plougmann; Pia Klausen; Anders Toxvaerd; Armita Armina Abedi; Bojan Kovacevic; John Gásdal Karstensen; Tim Svenstrup Poulsen; Evangelos Kalaitzakis; Estrid Høgdall; Peter Vilmann
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 3.  What should be known prior to performing EUS exams? (Part II).

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Barbara Braden; Sean Burmeister; Silvia Carrara; Xinwu Cui; Milena Di Leo; Yi Dong; Pietro Fusaroli; Uwe Gottschalk; Andrew J Healey; Michael Hocke; Stephan Hollerbach; Julio Iglesias Garcia; André Ignee; Christian Jürgensen; Michel Kahaleh; Masayuki Kitano; Rastislav Kunda; Alberto Larghi; Kathleen Möller; Bertrand Napoleon; Kofi W Oppong; Maria Chiara Petrone; Adrian Saftoiu; Rajesh Puri; Anand V Sahai; Erwin Santo; Malay Sharma; Assaad Soweid; Siyu Sun; Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Peter Vilmann; Hans Seifert; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Pancreatic Cytology with the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System: A Systematic Review, before Shifting into the Upcoming WHO International System.

Authors:  Ilias P Nikas; Tanja Proctor; Svenja Seide; Stylianos S Chatziioannou; Jordan P Reynolds; Dimitrios Ntourakis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Values of KRAS Mutations on EUS-FNA Specimens and Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Ronghua Wang; Yuchong Zhao; Yun Wang; Zhenxiong Zhao; Qian Chen; Yaqi Duan; Si Xiong; Zhou Luan; Jinlin Wang; Bin Cheng
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  Reliable Detection of Somatic Mutations for Pancreatic Cancer in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Fine Needle Aspirates with Next-Generation Sequencing: Implications from a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joseph R Habib; Yayun Zhu; Lingdi Yin; Ammar A Javed; Ding Ding; Jonathan Tenior; Michael Wright; Syed Z Ali; Richard A Burkhart; William Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Eunji Shin; Jun Yu; Jin He
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Comparison between Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Preparation in Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Pancreatic Lesions.

Authors:  Soo Hee Ko; Jung-Soo Pyo; Byoung Kwan Son; Hyo Young Lee; Il Whan Oh; Kwang Hyun Chung
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-09

8.  Quantitative monitoring of circulating tumor DNA in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Makoto Sugimori; Kazuya Sugimori; Hiromi Tsuchiya; Yoshimasa Suzuki; Sho Tsuyuki; Yoshihiro Kaneta; Akane Hirotani; Katsuyuki Sanga; Yuichiro Tozuka; Satoshi Komiyama; Takeshi Sato; Shun Tezuka; Yoshihiro Goda; Kuniyasu Irie; Haruo Miwa; Yuuki Miura; Tomohiro Ishii; Takashi Kaneko; Masatsugu Nagahama; Wataru Shibata; Akito Nozaki; Shin Maeda
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  New era for pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound: From imaging to molecular pathology of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Livia Archibugi; Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni; Miriam Redegalli; Maria Chiara Petrone; Michele Reni; Massimo Falconi; Claudio Doglioni; Gabriele Capurso; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-11-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.