| Literature DB >> 28449712 |
Ntuli A Kapologwe1,2, Gibson B Kagaruki3, Albino Kalolo4, Mariam Ally5, Amani Shao3, Manoris Meshack6, Manfred Stoermer7,8, Amena Briet7,8, Karin Wiedenmayer7,8, Axel Hoffman7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Introduction of a health insurance scheme is one of the ways to enhance access to health care services and to protect individuals from catastrophic health expenditures. Little is known on the influence of socio-demographic and social marketing strategies on enrollment and re-enrollment in the Community Health Fund/Tiba Kwa Kadi (CHF/TIKA) in Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: Barriers; Community health funds; Facilitators; Social marketing; Tanzania
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28449712 PMCID: PMC5408418 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2250-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Socio-demographic of the respondents by enrolment status
| Characteristics | Total, | Shinyanga, | Singida, |
|---|---|---|---|
| Response rate | 460(92.7) | 228(91.9) | 232(93.5) |
| Residential Locality | |||
| Rural | 235(51.1) | 116(50.9) | 119(51.3) |
| Urban | 225(48.9) | 112(49.1) | 113(48.7) |
| Level of Health Facility | |||
| Dispensary | 202(43.9) | 103(45.2) | 99(42.7) |
| Health Centre | 258(56.1) | 125(54.8) | 133(57.3) |
| Status of enrollment in CHF/TIKA | |||
| CHF/TIKA Member | 229(49.8) | 115(50.4) | 114(49.1) |
| Non CHF/TIKA Member | 231(50.2) | 113(49.6) | 118(50.9) |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 200(43.5) | 104(45.6) | 96(41.4) |
| Female | 260(56.5) | 124(54.4) | 136(58.6) |
| Age Group | |||
| < 25 | 109(23.7) | 50(21.9) | 59(25.4) |
| 25-34 | 152(33.0) | 65(28.5) | 87(37.5) |
| 35-44 | 114(24.8) | 69(30.3) | 45(19.4) |
| 45-54 | 52(11.3) | 24(10.5) | 28(12.1) |
| 55+ | 33(7.2) | 20(8.8) | 13(5.6) |
| Marital Status | |||
| Married | 356(77.3) | 176(77.2) | 180(77.6) |
| Single | 55(12.0) | 19((8.3) | 36(15.5) |
| Others | 49(10.7) | 33(14.5) | 16(6.9) |
| Education level | |||
| No formal education | 57(12.4) | 40(17.5) | 17(7.3) |
| Primary | 320(69.5) | 148(64.9) | 172(74.2) |
| Secondary | 78(17.0) | 38(16.7) | 40(17.2) |
| Others | 5(1.1) | 2(0.9) | 3(1.3) |
| Occupation | |||
| Farmer/peasants | 287(62.4) | 141(61.8) | 146(62.9) |
| Employed | 16(3.5) | 7(3.1) | 9(3.9) |
| Business | 86(18.7) | 43(18.9) | 43(18.5) |
| Student | 14(3.0) | 5(2.2) | 9(3.9) |
| None | 23(5.0) | 13(5.7) | 10(4.3) |
| Others | 34(7.4) | 19(8.3) | 15(6.5) |
| Sex of Head of Household | |||
| Male | 404(87.8) | 196(86.0) | 208(89.7) |
| Female | 56(12.2) | 32(14.0) | 24(10.3) |
| Mean monthly income | 199,884.4 | 215,154.2 | 185,489.0 |
| Mean household size | 6.0 | 6.6 | 5.3 |
Social marketing strategies reported by CHF/TIKA enrolled clients
| Strategy | Total, | Low (Shinyanga), | High (Singida), |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Dances | 4(1.7) | 3(2.6) | 1(0.9) | 0.314 |
| Football games | 2(0.9) | 2(1.7) | 0(0.0) | 0.251 |
| Sensitization at the health facility via health service providers | 206(90.0) | 100(87.0) | 106(93.0) | 0.097 |
| Radio media (local) | 126(55.0) | 60(52.2) | 66(57.9) | 0.231 |
| Radio media (national) | 103(45.0) | 48(41.7) | 55(48.2) | 0.196 |
| TV (national) | 45(19.7) | 19(16.5) | 26(22.8) | 0.151 |
| TV (local) | 39(17.0) | 16(13.9) | 23(20.2) | 0.139 |
| News papers | 15(6.6) | 9(7.8) | 6(5.3) | 0.304 |
| Influence of community leaders via meetings | 124(54.1) | 59(51.3) | 65(57.0) | 0.231 |
| Mosque or Church | 43(18.8) | 15(13.0) | 28(24.6) | 0.019 |
| Mixed approaches | 3(1.3) | 3(2.6) | 0(0.0) | 0.125 |
| House to house sensitizations | 31(13.5) | 17(14.8) | 14(12.3) | 0.360 |
| Banners | 36(15.7) | 16(13.9) | 20(17.5) | 0.283 |
| Others(relatives, schools, brochures etc) | 22(9.6) | 16(13.9) | 6(5.3) | 0.022 |
Social marketing strategies reported by non-enrolled clients on CHF/TIKA
| Strategy | Total | Low (Shinyanga), | High (Singida), (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Dances | 3(1.6) | 1(1.1) | 2(2.0) | 0.544 |
| Football games | 5(2.6) | 1(1.1) | 4(4.0) | 0.223 |
| Sensitization at the health facility via health service providers | 129(68.3) | 50(56.2) | 79(79.0) | 0.001 |
| Competition | 2(1.1) | 0(0.0) | 2(0.0) | 0.279 |
| Radio media (local) | 108(57.1) | 49(55.1) | 59(59.0) | 0.345 |
| Radio media (national) | 98(51.9) | 45(50.6) | 53(53.0) | 0.425 |
| TV (national) | 35(18.5) | 17(19.1) | 18(18.0) | 0.496 |
| TV (local) | 31(16.4) | 15(16.9) | 16(16.0) | 0.514 |
| News paper | 7(3.7) | 5(5.6) | 2(2.0) | 0.177 |
| Influence of community leaders via meetings | 74(39.2) | 23(25.8) | 51(51.0) |
|
| Mosque or Church | 32(16.9) | 8(9.0) | 24(24.0) | 0.005 |
| Mixed approaches | 6(3.2) | 3(3.4) | 3(3.0) | 0.602 |
| House to house sensitizations | 22(11.6) | 11(12.4) | 11(11.0) | 0.473 |
| Burners | 22(7.9) | 7(7.9) | 15(15.0) | 0.096 |
| Others(relative, schools, brochures etc) | 26(13.8) | 17(19.1) | 9(9.0) | 0.036 |
Determinants for enrollment or re-enrollment into CHF/TIKA scheme
| Determinant | Ready to enroll/re-enroll, |
| COR | AOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region CHF enrolment rate | ||||
| Low | 186(81.6) | 0.513 | 1 | |
| High | 190(81.9) | 1.0(0.6-1.6) | ||
| Locality | ||||
| Rural | 185(78.7) | 0.056 | 1 | 1 |
| Urban | 191(84.9) | 1.5(0.9-2.5)a | 1.5(0.9-2.4) | |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 157(78.5) | 0.073 | 1 | 1 |
| Female | 219(58.2) | 1.5(0.9-2.4)a | 1.4(0.8-2.2) | |
| Age group | ||||
| < 35 years | 218(83.5) | 0.155 | 1 | |
| 35+ years | 158(79.4) | 0.8(0.5-1.2) | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| Single | 40(72.7) | 0.056 | 1 | 1 |
| Married, divorced, widow etc | 336(83.0) | 1.8(1.0-3.5)a | 2.0(1.1-3.8) | |
| Education | ||||
| None/primary | 310(82.2) | 0.330 | 1 | 1 |
| Secondary/above | 66(79.5) | 0.84(0.5-1.5) | ||
| Family monthly average income | ||||
| Low (< median) | 170(82.5) | 0.507 | 1 | |
| High (≥median) | 193(82.1) | 1.0(0.6-1.6) | ||
| Family size (number of members) | ||||
| Small (<median 6) | 174(78.7) | 0.061 | 1 | 1 |
| Larger(≥median 6) | 200(84.7) | 1.5(0.9-2.4)a | 1.5(1.0-2.5) | |
| Number of marketing strategies ever exposed | ||||
| Never/one strategy | 113(83.1) | 0.366 | 1 | |
| Two & more strategies | 263(81.2) | 0.9(0.5-1.5) | ||
| Influence of leaders ever heard CHF message community leaders | ||||
| No | 175(79.5) | 0.126 | 1 | |
| Yes | 167(84.3) | 1.4(0.8-2.4) | ||
aSignificant factors during bivariate analysis at p ≤ 0.2