Literature DB >> 28449598

Using GRADE as a framework to guide research on the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of women living with HIV - methodological opportunities and challenges.

Nandi Siegfried1, Manjulaa Narasimhan2, Caitlin E Kennedy3, Alice Welbourn4, Anandi Yuvraj5.   

Abstract

In March 2016, WHO reviewed evidence to develop global recommendations on the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of women living with HIV. Systematic reviews and a global survey of women living with HIV informed the guideline development decision-making process. New recommendations covered abortion, Caesarean section, safe disclosure, and empowerment and self-efficacy interventions. Identification of key research gaps is part of the WHO guidelines development process, but consistent methods to do so are lacking. Our method aimed to ensure consistency and comprised the systematic application of a framework based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to the process. The framework incorporates the strength and quality rating of recommendations and the priorities reported by women in the survey to inform research prioritisation. For each gap, we also articulated: (1) the most appropriate and robust study design to answer the question; (2) alternative pragmatic designs if the ideal design is not feasible; and (3) the methodological challenges facing researchers through identifying potential biases. We found 12 research gaps and identified five appropriate study designs to address the related questions: (1) Cross-sectional surveys; (2) Qualitative interview-driven studies; (3) Registries; (4) Randomised controlled trials; and (5) Medical record audit. Methodological challenges included selection, recruitment, misclassification, measurement and contextual biases, and confounding. In conclusion, a framework based on GRADE can provide a systematic approach to identifying research gaps from a WHO guideline. Incorporation of the priorities of women living with HIV into the framework systematically ensures that women living with HIV can shape future policy decisions affecting their lives. Implementation science and participatory research are appropriate over-arching approaches to enhance uptake of interventions and to ensure inclusion of women living with HIV at all stages of the research process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GRADE; HIV; WHO; research gaps; sexual and reproductive health and rights

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28449598     DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1317711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Care        ISSN: 0954-0121


  7 in total

1.  Contraception values and preferences of people living with HIV: A systematic review.

Authors:  Haneefa T Saleem; Joseph G Rosen; Caitlin Quinn; Avani Duggaraju; Caitlin E Kennedy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Medical and surgical abortion for women living with HIV.

Authors:  Haneefa T Saleem; Manjulaa Narasimhan; Bela Ganatra; Caitlin E Kennedy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-19

3.  The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective.

Authors:  Eva A Rehfuess; Jan M Stratil; Inger B Scheel; Anayda Portela; Susan L Norris; Rob Baltussen
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2019-01-25

Review 4.  On the CUSP: the politics and prospects of scaling social norms change programming.

Authors:  Leah Goldmann; Rebecka Lundgren; Alice Welbourn; Diane Gillespie; Ellen Bajenja; Lufuno Muvhango; Lori Michau
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2019-05

5.  Effects of family planning factors on the awareness of sexual and reproductive healthcare rights among married women of reproductive age in China: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Wu Junqing; Yu Chuanning; Li Yuyan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Prioritising gender, equity, and human rights in a GRADE-based framework to inform future research on self care for sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Authors:  Nandi Siegfried; Manjulaa Narasimhan; Carmen H Logie; Rebekah Thomas; Laura Ferguson; Kevin Moody; Michelle Remme
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-03-30

Review 7.  When complexity matters: a step-by-step guide to incorporating a complexity perspective in guideline development for public health and health system interventions.

Authors:  A Movsisyan; E Rehfuess; S L Norris
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.615

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.