Literature DB >> 28449597

Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.

Sebastian Rählmann1, Markus Meis2, Michael Schulte2, Jürgen Kießling3, Martin Walger1,4, Hartmut Meister1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Model-based hearing aid development considers the assessment of speech recognition using a master hearing aid (MHA). It is known that aided speech recognition in noise is related to cognitive factors such as working memory capacity (WMC). This relationship might be mediated by hearing aid experience (HAE). The aim of this study was to examine the relationship of WMC and speech recognition with a MHA for listeners with different HAE.
DESIGN: Using the MHA, unaided and aided 80% speech recognition thresholds in noise were determined. Individual WMC capacity was assed using the Verbal Learning and Memory Test (VLMT) and the Reading Span Test (RST). STUDY SAMPLE: Forty-nine hearing aid users with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss divided into three groups differing in HAE.
RESULTS: Whereas unaided speech recognition did not show a significant relationship with WMC, a significant correlation could be observed between WMC and aided speech recognition. However, this only applied to listeners with HAE of up to approximately three years, and a consistent weakening of the correlation could be observed with more experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Speech recognition scores obtained in acute experiments with an MHA are less influenced by individual cognitive capacity when experienced HA users are taken into account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Model-based algorithms; master hearing aid; speech recognition; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28449597     DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1319079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Speech comprehension and cognitive performance in acoustically difficult situations].

Authors:  H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Understanding Variability in Individual Response to Hearing Aid Signal Processing in Wearable Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Tim Schoof; Melinda Anderson; Dorina Strori; Lauren Balmert
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Can Dual Compression Offer Better Mandarin Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality Than Fast-Acting Compression?

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Lena L N Wong; Volker Kuehnel; Jinyu Qian; Solveig Christina Voss; Wang Shangqiguo
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Home-Based Speech Perception Monitoring for Clinical Use With Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Sara Magits; Tom Francart; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.