Literature DB >> 28449530

Quality improvement in the ICU: treat first what kills first.

Peter H J van der Voort1.   

Abstract

Professionals in the ICU, like nurses and doctors, are constantly working on quality improvement by developing protocols and monitoring the implementation with indicators. Protocols and quality indicators are usually based on evidence. Studies on quality improvement often measure the effect of protocols after implementation but frequently cannot replicate the results of the previously performed RCTs in clinical practice. Amongst other reasons, this is due to the selection of patients that are included in RCTs. Several quality improvement initiatives can be studied together in daily practice as a bundle with a multifaceted approach. A recent study is discussed that shows that this approach can only give significant results when the interventions are focussed on the main processes that are related to the chosen outcome measures. Several different reasons are apparently the cause that quality improvement studies often reveal negative results. Quality improvement studies need to have a rigorous design and well-chosen endpoints.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICU; Quality improvement; critically ill; indicator; multifaceted approach

Year:  2017        PMID: 28449530      PMCID: PMC5393997          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  10 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Maartje de Vos; Wilco Graafmans; Mieneke Kooistra; Bert Meijboom; Peter Van Der Voort; Gert Westert
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 3.  The effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies--a synthesis of systematic review findings.

Authors:  Mathew Prior; Michelle Guerin; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Improving quality of care. A systematic review on how medical registries provide information feedback to health care providers.

Authors:  Sabine N van der Veer; Nicolette F de Keizer; Anita C J Ravelli; Suzanne Tenkink; Kitty J Jager
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.046

6.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

Review 7.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Jean M Carlet; Henry Masur; Herwig Gerlach; Thierry Calandra; Jonathan Cohen; Juan Gea-Banacloche; Didier Keh; John C Marshall; Margaret M Parker; Graham Ramsay; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 8.  Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  R C Bone; R A Balk; F B Cerra; R P Dellinger; A M Fein; W A Knaus; R M Schein; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Effect of a Quality Improvement Intervention With Daily Round Checklists, Goal Setting, and Clinician Prompting on Mortality of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alexandre B Cavalcanti; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Flavia R Machado; Jorge I F Salluh; Valquiria Pelisser Campagnucci; Patricia Vendramim; Helio Penna Guimaraes; Karina Normilio-Silva; Lucas Petri Damiani; Edson Romano; Fernanda Carrara; Juliana Lubarino Diniz de Souza; Aline Reis Silva; Grazielle Viana Ramos; Cassiano Teixeira; Nilton Brandão da Silva; Chung-Chou H Chang; Derek C Angus; Otavio Berwanger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.

Authors:  James Cane; Denise O'Connor; Susan Michie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.