Literature DB >> 28448659

Evaluation of Ecological Momentary Assessment for Tinnitus Severity.

Rachel L Goldberg1, Marilyn L Piccirillo2, Joyce Nicklaus3, Andrew Skillington1, Eric Lenze4, Thomas L Rodebaugh2, Dorina Kallogjeri1, Jay F Piccirillo5.   

Abstract

Importance: Existing patient-reported outcome measures of tinnitus assess the severity and disability retrospectively, which may result in adequate reliability, but cannot capture the fluctuating and individualized nature of tinnitus. Experience sampling may provide an alternative. Objective: To use an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to measure tinnitus disability and associated constructs. Design, Setting, and Participants: Forty adults with tinnitus provided self-report of their tinnitus bother using 5 questions measured by EMA, as well as standard retrospective outcome measures. In this 6-week longitudinal observational study conducted from July 15 to December 22, 2014, participants provided EMA data for 2 weeks (part 1); then after a 2-week break, they provided EMA data for an additional 2 weeks (part 2). A text message with a link to the EMA survey was sent for a total of 56 assessments during each 2-week assessment period. Ecological momentary assessment responses were evaluated using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis to assess the fluctuating nature of bothersome tinnitus across the group and within the pool of individuals over time. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ecological momentary assessment questions measured tinnitus disability and associated constructs. Compliance in each study part was assessed based on response rates. The Tinnitus Functional Index and the Overall Global Rating of Bother Scale were assessed at the beginning and end of each 2-week assessment period to explore the effect of the frequent EMAs on the perceived level of bother from tinnitus.
Results: Of the 40 participants in the study (10 women and 30 men; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [10.5] years), the median survey response rate was high (49 responses to 56 surveys sent [88%] for part 1 and 47 responses of 56 surveys sent [84%] for part 2). The latent factor identified by the 2-level confirmatory factor analysis models demonstrates that within-individual tinnitus bother, loudness, and stress vary together over time. In addition, tinnitus bother, feeling, and stress symptoms all vary together across individuals, which means that bother and stress covary strongly both across time and across individuals. Conclusions and Relevance: Ecological momentary assessment evaluates the moment-to-moment perception of tinnitus and the effect of emotional and environmental factors, which suggests that it is a superior tool to measure tinnitus outcomes compared with standard retrospective self-reports. Taken together, information from emotional and environmental factors can be summarized in an underlying (latent) factor that represents a vulnerability to bothersome tinnitus and that can be used to comprehensively describe the tinnitus experience. Momentary variability in tinnitus bother is strongly associated with levels of perceived stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28448659      PMCID: PMC5824204          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  29 in total

Review 1.  Psychological aspects of tinnitus and the application of cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Authors:  Gerhard Andersson
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-09

2.  The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice.

Authors:  Joan Busner; Steven D Targum
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-07

Review 3.  Tinnitus.

Authors:  David Baguley; Don McFerran; Deborah Hall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus among US adults.

Authors:  Josef Shargorodsky; Gary C Curhan; Wildon R Farwell
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Pilot study to evaluate ecological momentary assessment of tinnitus.

Authors:  James A Henry; Gino Galvez; Mitchel B Turbin; Emily J Thielman; Garnett P McMillan; Joseph A Istvan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The tinnitus functional index: development of a new clinical measure for chronic, intrusive tinnitus.

Authors:  Mary B Meikle; James A Henry; Susan E Griest; Barbara J Stewart; Harvey B Abrams; Rachel McArdle; Paula J Myers; Craig W Newman; Sharon Sandridge; Dennis C Turk; Robert L Folmer; Eric J Frederick; John W House; Gary P Jacobson; Sam E Kinney; William H Martin; Stephen M Nagler; Gloria E Reich; Grant Searchfield; Robert Sweetow; Jack A Vernon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Ecological momentary assessment versus standard assessment instruments for measuring mindfulness, depressed mood, and anxiety among older adults.

Authors:  Raeanne C Moore; Colin A Depp; Julie Loebach Wetherell; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  Tinnitus impairs cognitive efficiency.

Authors:  R S Hallam; L McKenna; L Shurlock
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Difficulties experienced by tinnitus sufferers.

Authors:  R S Tyler; L J Baker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1983-05

Review 10.  Threats to validity in retrospective studies.

Authors:  Cindy Tofthagen
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2012-05
View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessing Change Over Time in Voice Handicap and Voice-Related Perceived Control Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Viann N Nguyen-Feng; Patricia A Frazier; Ali Stockness; Scott Lunos; Alexis N Hoedeman; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Feasibility of Intensive Ecological Sampling of Tinnitus in Intervention Research.

Authors:  Katherine M Gerull; Dorina Kallogjeri; Marilyn L Piccirillo; Thomas L Rodebaugh; Eric J Lenze; Jay F Piccirillo
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.591

3.  Why Is There No Cure for Tinnitus?

Authors:  Don J McFerran; David Stockdale; Ralph Holme; Charles H Large; David M Baguley
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Introducing the DizzyQuest: an app-based diary for vestibular disorders.

Authors:  E C Martin; C Leue; P Delespaul; F Peeters; A M L Janssen; R Lousberg; A Erdkamp; S van de Weijer; J Widdershoven; H Blom; T Bruintjes; A Zwergal; E Grill; N Guinand; A Perez-Fornos; M R van de Berg; J J A Stultiens; H Kingma; R van de Berg
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Electronic Versus Traditional Data Collection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Perioperative Pain Trial.

Authors:  James S Khan; Lindsay A Jibb; Jason W Busse; Ian Gilron; Stephen Choi; James E Paul; Michael McGillion; Sean Mackey; D Norman Buckley; Shun Fu Lee; P J Devereaux
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2019-07-30

Review 6.  A State-of-Art Review of Digital Technologies for the Next Generation of Tinnitus Therapeutics.

Authors:  Grant D Searchfield; Philip J Sanders; Zohreh Doborjeh; Maryam Doborjeh; Roger Boldu; Kevin Sun; Amit Barde
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2021-08-10

7.  The Daily Experience of Subjective Tinnitus: Ecological Momentary Assessment Versus End-of-Day Diary.

Authors:  Matheus P C G Lourenco; Jorge Simoes; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Rilana F F Cima
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Fluctuations in Subjective Tinnitus Ratings Over Time: Implications for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Jenny X Chen; Jonathon P Whitton; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.619

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.