| Literature DB >> 28448502 |
Clara Lemani1, Jennifer H Tang1,2, Dawn Kopp1, Billy Phiri1, Chrissy Kumvula3, Loyce Chikosi3, Mwawi Mwale4, Nora E Rosenberg1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Young women in Malawi face many challenges in accessing family planning (FP), including distance to the health facility and partner disapproval. Our primary objective was to assess if training HSAs in couples counseling would increase modern FP uptake among young women.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28448502 PMCID: PMC5407810 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Health Surveillance Assistant and family planning client characteristics.
| Male/Rural | 3 (20%) | 3 (20%) |
| Female/Rural | 7 (47%) | 7 (47%) |
| Female/Urban | 5 (33%) | 5 (33%) |
| 20–29 years | 1 (6%) | 1 (6%) |
| 30–39 years | 6 (40%) | 7 (47%) |
| 40–49 years | 8 (54%) | 7 (47%) |
| 28.6 (2.84) | 25.2 (8.35) | |
| 14–19 years | 96 (22%) | 96 (26%) |
| 20–25 years | 198 (46%) | 179 (47%) |
| 26–30 years | 136 (32%) | 103 (27%) |
| Rural | 291 (68%) | 251 (66%) |
| Urban | 139 (32%) | 127 (34%) |
| Not Married | 44 (10%) | 67(18%) |
| Married | 386 (90%) | 311 (82%) |
| No child | 13 (3%) | 34 (9%) |
| 1 child | 214 (50%) | 225 (60%) |
| 2 children | 130 (30%) | 70 (19%) |
| 3 children | 73 (17%) | 49 (13%) |
| Female | 341 (79%) | 288 (76%) |
| Male | 89 (21%) | 90 (24%) |
Family planning outcomes at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up visits.
| Baseline visit | 3-month follow-up visit | 6-month follow-up visit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Couples Counseling Group (n = 430) | Routine Counseling Group (n = 378) | Couples Counseling Group (n = 421) | Routine Counseling Group (n = 365) | Couples Counseling Group (n = 420) | Routine Counseling Group (n = 361) | |
| Male partner present | 115 (27%) | 6 (2%) | 13 (3%) | 2 (0.6%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| FP method given | ||||||
| OC | 36 (8%) | 27 (7%) | 21 (5%) | 21 (6%) | 21 (5%) | 17 (5%) |
| DMPA | 386 (90%) | 347 (92%) | 390 (92%) | 338 (93%) | 387 (92%) | 338 (93%) |
| Did not receive OC or DMPA | 8 (2%) | 4 (1%) | 10 (2%) | 6 (2%) | 12 (3%) | 6 (2%) |
| Received Condoms | 180 (42%) | 115 (30%) | 2 (0.5%) | 0 (0%) | 28 (7%) | 10 (3%) |
| Referred for FP | 31 (7%) | 14 (4%) | 3 (0.7%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.24%) | 3 (0.8%) |
| Implant | 29 (93%) | 11 (79%) | 3 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | 0 |
| IUD | 1 (3%) | 1 (7%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| BTL | 1 (3%) | 2 (14%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Vasectomy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Went for FP referral | ||||||
| Yes | 10 (32%) | 6 (43%) | 1 (33%) | 0 (0%) | N/A | N/A |
| Implant | 10 | 6 | 1 | 0 | ||
| IUD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| BTL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| No | 20 (65%) | 8 (57%) | 2 (67%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Implant | 18 | 5 | 2 | |||
| IUD | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||
| BTL | 1 | 2 | 0 | |||
FP, Family Planning; OC, oral contraceptives; DMPA, Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate; IUD, intrauterine device; BTL, bilateral tubal ligation
Summary statistics for family planning outcomes.
| Family Planning Outcome | Couples Counseling Group | Routine Counseling Group | Risk Difference | P- value | Confidence Intervals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started Modern FP | 426 (99.1%) | 378 (100%) | -0.009 | 0.087 | -0.020, 0.001 |
| Started LARC | 11 (2.6%) | 6 (1.6%) | 0.010 | 0.458 | -0.016, 0.037 |
| Started SARC | 415 (97.4%) | 372 (98.4%) | -0.010 | 0.443 | -0.038, 0.016 |
| FP Method switch | 20 (4.8%) | 7 (1.9%) | 0.015 | 0.372 | -0.017, 0.048 |
| Continuation of FP method at 6 months | 419 (97.4%) | 356 (94.2%) | 0.033 | 0.064 | -0.001, 0.068 |
| Received dual method | 176 (61.3%) | 111 (38.6%) | 0.083 | 0.274 | -0.065, 0.232 |
FP, family planning; LARC, long acting reversible contraception; SARC, short acting reversible contraception