Literature DB >> 28448404

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Ocular Melanoma as a Tool to Predict Metastatic Potential.

Wenbo Wei1, Guang Jia, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk, Johannes T Heverhagen, Mohamed Abdel-Rahman, Lai Wei, John B Christoforidis, Frederick Davidorf, Michael V Knopp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study explores the capability of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to differentiate tumor characteristics of metastatic and nonmetastatic choroidal melanoma as a potential tool for patient management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 13 patients (69 ± 9 years) with choroidal melanoma were imaged using DCE-MRI on a 3-T MRI system with a 16-channel head coil. The Tofts 2-compartment model was chosen for quantification, and parameters K (the transfer constant from the blood plasma to the extracellular space) and Kep (the transfer constant from the extracellular space to the blood plasma) were calculated and compared. Metastasis was excluded by subsequent clinical work-up or confirmed by histology after targeted biopsy.
RESULTS: Six patients were diagnosed with metastatic melanoma and 7 without. All orbital tumors were at least larger than 2 mm. A significant difference was identified in K between patients with (0.73 ± 0.18/min) and without (1.00 ± 0.21/min) metastatic melanoma (P = 0.03), whereas the difference was not significantly shown in Kep (2.58 ± 1.54/min of metastatic patients vs 2.98 ± 1.83/min of nonmetastatic patients, P = 0.67).
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to differentiate orbital melanomas with metastatic and nonmetastatic spread. Thus, DCE-MRI has the potential to be an in vivo imaging technique to predict early which patients are prone to metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28448404     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

Review 1.  Is Tissue Still the Issue? The Promise of Liquid Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Daniël P de Bruyn; Aaron B Beasley; Robert M Verdijk; Natasha M van Poppelen; Dion Paridaens; Ronald O B de Keizer; Nicole C Naus; Elin S Gray; Annelies de Klein; Erwin Brosens; Emine Kiliç
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-21

Review 2.  Diagnostic methods and therapeutic options of uveal melanoma with emphasis on MR imaging-Part I: MR imaging with pathologic correlation and technical considerations.

Authors:  Pietro Valerio Foti; Mario Travali; Renato Farina; Stefano Palmucci; Corrado Spatola; Luigi Raffaele; Vincenzo Salamone; Rosario Caltabiano; Giuseppe Broggi; Lidia Puzzo; Andrea Russo; Michele Reibaldi; Antonio Longo; Paolo Vigneri; Teresio Avitabile; Giovani Carlo Ettorre; Antonio Basile
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-06-03

3.  The Economic Value of MR-Imaging for Uveal Melanoma.

Authors:  Lorna Grech Fonk; Teresa A Ferreira; Andrew G Webb; Gregorius P M Luyten; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-28

4.  Prognosis Prediction of Uveal Melanoma After Plaque Brachytherapy Based on Ultrasound With Machine Learning.

Authors:  Jingting Luo; Yuning Chen; Yuhang Yang; Kai Zhang; Yueming Liu; Hanqing Zhao; Li Dong; Jie Xu; Yang Li; Wenbin Wei
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-21

5.  Eye-specific quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI analysis for patients with intraocular masses.

Authors:  Myriam G Jaarsma-Coes; Teresa A Ferreira; Petra J van Houdt; Uulke A van der Heide; Gregorius P M Luyten; Jan-Willem M Beenakker
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.310

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.