Literature DB >> 28447731

Vatalanib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, decreases hepatic fibrosis and sinusoidal capillarization in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice.

Ling-Jian Kong1, Hao Li1, Ya-Ju Du1, Feng-Hua Pei1, Ying Hu1, Liao-Liao Zhao1, Jing Chen1.   

Abstract

Among the various consequence arising from lung injury, hepatic fibrosis is the most severe. Decreasing the effects of hepatic fibrosis remains one of the primary therapeutic challenges in hepatology. Dysfunction of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells is considered to be one of the initial events that occur in liver injury. Vascular endothelial growth factor signaling is involved in the progression of genotype changes. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor, vatalanib, on hepatic fibrosis and hepatic sinusoidal capillarization in a carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)‑induced mouse model of liver fibrosis. Liver fibrosis was induced in BALB/c mice using CCl4 by intraperitoneal injection for 6 weeks. The four experimental groups included a control, and three experimental groups involving administration of CCl4, vatalanib and a combination of the two. Histopathological staining and measuring live hydroxyproline content evaluated the extent of liver fibrosis. The expression of α‑smooth muscle actin (SMA) and cluster of differentiation (CD) 34 was detected by immunohistochemistry. Collagen type I, α‑SMA, transforming growth factor (TGF)‑β1 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) expression levels were measured by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR). The average number of fenestrae per hepatic sinusoid was determined using transmission electron microscopy. Liver fibrosis scores and hydroxyproline content were decreased in both vatalanib groups. In addition, both doses of vatalanib decreased mRNA expression levels of hepatic α-SMA, TGF-β1, collagen‑1, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2. Levels of α‑SMA and CD34 protein were decreased in the vatalanib group compared with the CCl4 group. There were significant differences in the number of fenestrae per sinusoid between the groups. The present study identified that administration of vatalanib was associated with decreased liver fibrosis and hepatic sinusoidal capillarization in CCl4-induced mouse models, and is a potential compound for counteracting liver fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447731      PMCID: PMC5428398          DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Med Rep        ISSN: 1791-2997            Impact factor:   2.952


Introduction

Hepatic fibrosis is a primary consequence of liver injury that results from chronic liver diseases, including chronic viral hepatitis, alcohol and metabolic liver disease (1,2). The ultimate aim is to treat the cause of the liver disease, which may lead to the reversal of fibrosis (3,4). With emerging novel technology and refined methodologies, knowledge concerning the mechanisms underlying liver fibrosis and its pathogenesis are continuously expanding (5). However, the development of anti-fibrotic compounds represents a major therapeutic challenge (6). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an important mediator of angiogenesis (7). In addition, VEGF and its receptors serve critical roles in chronic inflammation and liver fibrosis (8,9). Angiogenesis is involved in chronic inflammatory liver disease. The fact that these diseases respond poorly to conventional anti-inflammatory therapy suggests that angiogenesis may be an effective therapeutic target in reversing persistent, stable inflammation in chronic liver diseases (10). Intra-hepatic angiogenesis and sinusoidal remodeling occur in many chronic liver diseases (11). Anti-angiogenesis treatment may be a therapeutic approach in liver fibrosis and portal hypertension (11). It has been previously reported that anti-angiogenesis drugs, including sorafenib, sunitinib, and Endostar, which are used in the treatment of carcinoma, inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma and liver fibrosis (12–15). Vatalanib, also known as PTK/ZK, is an orally active, small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is effective against all VEGF receptors (16,17). It has been demonstrated that the combination of vatalanib and intravenous doxorubicin administration has encouraging activity in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients (18). In China, the majority of HCC patients have co-existing hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis (19). A previous study indicated that vatalanib had anti-fibrotic effects in experimental liver fibrosis in vivo (20). However, the underlying mechanism by which this occurs remains unclear. The aim of the current study was to determine the anti-fibrogenic effects of vatalanib in terms of pathological alterations of the liver and hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell (SEC) phenotypes in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice.

Materials and methods

Mouse model of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis

Vatalanib was purchased from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA, USA; cat. no. V-8303), and dissolved in 100 mg/ml distilled water. A total of 32 male BALB/c mice weighing 18–20 g were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology (Beijing, China). The Animal Care and Use Committee of Harbin Medical University approved all protocols and procedures (Harbin, China). Animals were housed in an air-conditioned room at 23–25°C with a 12-h dark/light cycle for one week prior to the initiation of experiments. All animals received appropriate care during the study with unlimited access to food and water. Liver fibrosis was induced in mice by intraperitoneal injection of CCl4 (40% CCl4 in olive oil, 0.2 ml/100 g body weight, twice weekly) for 6 weeks as previously reported (21). A total of four groups were studied: Group 1, normal control mice; group 2, CCl4 alone; group 3, CCl4 + vatalanib (50 mg/kg/d by gavage for 6 weeks, vatalanib was administered simultaneously with a CCl4 injection for 6 weeks); and group 4, CCl4 + vatalanib (50 mg/kg/d by gavage for 4 weeks, CCl4 alone was administered to mice for 2 weeks, following which vatalanib was administered to mice simultaneously with CCl4 injection for another 4 weeks). In the previous study, vatalanib (50 and 100 mg/kg/d) was well tolerated by the mice, and had no significant effects on body weight (22). Therefore, 50 mg/kg/d was used in the present study. Previous studies identified that CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis is present after 2 weeks (20). Group 1 received olive oil intraperitoneally at the same dose and conditions as the CCl4-treated mice. Mice were euthanized (via 2% pentobarbital i.p. at 0.3 ml/ 100 g body weight) and liver samples were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further use. An additional section was embedded in paraffin and sliced into 4–5 µm sections.

Histological examination

Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Sirius Red (Solarbio Life Sciences, Beijing, China) for histopathological analysis and liver fibrosis evaluation. Each sample was independently assessed and scored by two pathologists, blinded to the study protocol, according to a fibrosis score system (16). Liver fibrosis was divided into seven stages: 0, no fibrosis; 1, short fibrous tissue in central venule (C); 2, fibrous between central venule and central venule (C-C) septa appearance; 3, C-C fibrous septa incompletely developed; 4, C-C septa completely connected (pseudo-lobule); 5, C-P (portal tract) bridging fibrosis, nodular appearance ≤50%; and 6, nodular appearance >50%.

Hepatic hydroxyproline analyses

Hepatic hydroxyproline was measured using a hydroxyproline detection kit (Jiancheng Institute of Biotechnology, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The hydroxyproline content is expressed as mg/g wet liver.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Samples were processed for TEM as described previously (23). Fresh specimens were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde (Beijing Brilliance Biochemical Company, Beijing, China), washed with PBS, and fixed in 1% osmic acid for 60 min. The samples were dehydrated through an alcohol series, embedded in EPON 812 epoxy resin (Hede Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and then cut into 50 nm sections with an ultrathin microtome. Following staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate for 30 min, the sections were examined using a transmission electron microscope (cat. no. H-7650; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). A total of 10 hepatic sinusoids with a diameter of 2–3 µm were randomly selected from each group and subgroup, and the mean number of fenestrae per hepatic sinusoid was determined. Each sample was independently assessed and scored by two pathologists, both blinded to the study protocol.

Biochemical analyses

Blood was collected from the inferior vena cava. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) and albumin were assayed using an automatic biochemical analyzer (cat. no. 7600; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Immunohistochemistry staining for α-SMA and CD34

CD34 is a marker of newly-formed blood vessels. The vascular density in portal and peri-portal areas was assessed by determining the number of CD34-labeled vessel sections (24). Liver tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin for 1 week at room temperature, sliced into 4–6 mm pieces, dehydrated in ethanol and embedded in paraffin wax. α-SMA and CD34 were detected in paraffin-embedded liver sections (4–5 µm thick) using the following specific primary antibodies: α-SMA (cat. no. A2547; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and CD34 (cat no. ab81289; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and an avidin-biotin complex immunoperoxidase method (15). Following antigen retrieval by immersion in EDTA (1 mmol/l, pH 8.0) and boiling for 15 min, sections were pre-blocked with normal goat serum for 10 min, and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with specific antibodies (α-SMA, dilution 1:200; CD34, dilution, 1:200). PBS was used in place of the primary antibodies for the negative controls. Following rinsing, the biotinylated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG, cat no. ZDR-5307, goat anti-mouse IgG, cat. no. ZDR-5306, OriGene Technologies, Inc., Beijing, China), avidin-biotin complex and horseradish peroxidase (Strept ABComplex; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) were applied. Finally, the sections were washed with PBS, developed with diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride substrate (Strept ABComplex; Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc.) for 3 min, and counterstained with hematoxylin. Computer-assisted semi-quantitative analysis was used to evaluate the areas of positive α-SMA and CD34 staining using Image-ProPlus software (version 4.5; Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The data for the α-SMA and CD34 staining are expressed as the mean percentage of the positively stained area relative to the total tissue section area (17).

Measurement of mRNA levels of collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 by RT-qPCR

Total RNA was extracted from liver tissues and HSC-T6 cells using a TRIzol® Reagent kit (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The quality of total RNA was verified by ultraviolet absorbance spectrophotometry at 260 and 280 nm. cDNA was reversed transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The thermocycling parameters were as follows: 25°C for 10 min, 37°C for 150 min, 85°C for 5 sec, and 4°C for 5 min for one cycle, before chilling on ice. cDNA was stored at −20°C until further required. Collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 mRNA levels were quantified using the primers presented in Tables I and II. GAPDH, a housekeeping gene, was used as an internal control primer for target genes. All primers were obtained from Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. The expression of mRNA was measured by SYBR Green Real-Time PCR using an ABI 7500 instrument (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). PCR was performed in 20 µl buffer that contained 2 µg cDNA, 1 µl each primer and 10 µl SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Comparative quantitation threshold (Cq) calculations were all relative to the control group. The expression of mRNA relative to the control was derived using the equation 2−∆∆Cq (25).
Table I.

Primers for reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis.

GeneDirectionPrimer sequence (5′-3′)Accession number
GAPDH (mouse)FGCACAGTCAAGGCCGAGAATXM_001476707.3
RGCCTTCTCCATGGTGGTGAA
Col I a1 (mouse)FTTCACCTACAGCACGCTTGTGNM_007742.3
RGATGACTGTCTTGCCCCAAGTT
α-SMA (mouse)FTCAGCGCCTCCAGTTCCTNM_007392.2
RAAAAAAAACCACGAGTAACAAATCAA
TGF-β1 (mouse)FCCCGAACCCCCATTGCTGTCCNM_011577.1
RAGGCGTATCAGTGGGGGTCAG
VEGFR1 (mouse)FCCACCTCTCTATCCGCTGGNM_010228.3
RACCAATGTGCTAACCGTCTTATT
VEGFR2 (mouse)FCAAACCTCAATGTGTCTCTTTGCNM_010612.2
RAGAGTAAAGCCTATCTCGCTGT

Col I a1, type I collagen; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; F, forward; R, reverse; CCl4, carbon tetrachloride.

Table II.

Effects of vatalanib on CCl4-induced liver fibrosis.

Liver fibrosis score

Group0123456Mean ± standard deviation
1 (n=7)70000000
2 (n=8)00002514.88±0.64
3 (n=8)0043100  2.6±0.74[a]
4 (n=8)0033110  3.0±1.07[a]

CCl4, carbon tetrachloride. Group 1, normal control; group 2, CCl4 model; group 3, CCl4 + vatalanib (6 weeks, 50 mg/kg); and group 4, CCl4 + vatalanib (4 weeks, 50 mg/kg).

P<0.01 vs. CCl4 group.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of one way analysis of variance and unpaired Student's t-test as appropriate. Non-parametric data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

Results

Vatalanib inhibits liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced mice

There were no collagen fibers along the central vein in control group 1 (Fig. 1A). In group 2, collagenous fibers extended from the central vein and the portal area to the hepatic lobules with pseudo-lobule formation (Fig. 1B). With administration of vatalanib (50 mg/kg/d, for 4 or 6 weeks) in groups 3 (Fig. 1C) and 4 (Fig. 1D), collagenous fibers were decreased compared with group 2. The fibrosis scores following vatalanib administration in groups 3 and 4 were significantly reduced when compared with those in group 2 (P<0.05; Table II). In addition, vatalanib reduced hydroxyproline concentrations in liver tissue, reflecting decreased total hepatic collagen content (P<0.01; Table III).
Figure 1.

Vatalanib attenuates the extent of liver fibrosis in CCl4-stimulated mice. Representative photomicrographs of Sirius Red staining in groups (A) 1, control; (B) 2, CCl4 model; (C) 3, CCl4 + vatalanib (6 weeks, 50 mg/kg) and (D) 4, CCl4 + vatalanib (4 weeks, 50 mg/kg). Magnification, ×100. CCl4, carbon tetrachloride.

Table III.

Effects of vatalanib on biochemical markers in CCl4-treated mice.

Group 1 (n=7)Group 2 (n=8)Group 3 (n=8)Group 4 (n=8)
Hydroxyproline (mg/g liver)0.1±0.0492.0±4.654.2±5.4[a]49.8±6.9[a]
ALT (IU/ml)38.4±5.9149.5±19.498.8±14.6[a]109.2±10.4[a]
AST (IU/ml)41.0±8.3235.5±16.8149.0±14.8[a]153.9±19.0[a]
TBIL (mg/dl)1.0±0.11.9±0.21.8±0.31.8±0.2
Albumin (g/l)34.8±1.526.2±1.928.6±1.629.2±1.8

ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; TBIL, total bilirubin; CCl4, carbon tetrachloride. Group 1, normal control; group 2, CCl4 model; group 3, CCl4 + vatalanib (6 weeks, 50 mg/kg); and group 4, CCl4 + vatalanib (4 weeks, 50 mg/kg). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.

P<0.01 (vatalanib group vs. CCl4 group).

Vatalanib reduces liver inflammation

Serum ALT and AST levels were significantly decreased following vatalanib treatment (P<0.01), whereas no significant alterations in serum TBIL and albumin levels were observed (P>0.05; Table III).

Vatalanib inhibits α-SMA and CD34 protein levels

Levels of α-SMA, a typical marker of activated HSCs, were assessed by immunohistochemistry to evaluate the effect of vatalanib on HSC activation during hepatic fibrosis. There was no positive staining in control group 1 (Fig. 2A). CCl4 alone led to considerable increases in the amount of α-SMA positive cells, which were distributed throughout the fibrotic septa (Fig. 2B). Computer-assisted semi-quantitative analysis revealed that vatalanib-treated groups (groups 3 and 4) presented significantly decreased α-SMA-positive areas compared with group 2 (P<0.05; Fig. 2C-E). These results demonstrated that vatalanib decreased the number of activated HSCs.
Figure 2.

Vatalanib suppresses α-SMA and CD34 expression in CCl4-induced fibrotic mouse livers. Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemistry staining of α-SMA expression in the following groups: (A) 1, normal control; (B) 2, CCl4 model; (C) 3, CCl4 + vatalanib (6 weeks, 50 mg/kg) and (D) 4, CCl4 + vatalanib (4 weeks, 50 mg/kg). (E) Semi-quantitative analysis of the immunohistochemical staining. (F-J) Representative photomicrographs of immunohistochemical staining of CD34 expression in groups (F) 1, (G) 2, (H) 3 and (I) 4. (J) Semi-quantitative analysis of the immunohistochemical staining. Magnification, ×100. α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; CCl4, carbon tetrachloride; CD34, cluster of differentiation 34. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 vatalanib vs. CCl4 group. **P<0.05 CCl4 vs. normal group.

There was little positive CD34 staining in the control group 1 (Fig. 2F). Following six weeks of CCl4 induction, this led to significant increases in the number of CD34 positive cells, while groups 3 and 4 presented significantly decreased CD34 positive areas compared with group 2 (P<0.05; Fig. 2G-J).

Ultrastructural changes in fibrotic mice after vatalanib treatment

There were significantly increased fenestrae per SEC in group 1 (Fig. 3A) compared with group 2 (Fig. 3B; P<0.01; Table IV). In group 2, the microvilli of hepatocytes in the perisinusoidal space and the intra-lobular bile ducts (cholangioles) disappeared (Fig. 3C), and the junctions between hepatocytes were destroyed (Fig. 3D). In group 3, the number of fenestrae was significantly increased compared with group 2 (P<0.01; Fig. 3E; Table IV), and cholangioles appeared morphologically healthy (Fig. 3F). Group 4 additionally had an increased number of fenestrae compared with group 2 (Fig. 3G; Table IV), and presented with cell junctions similar to normal control mice (Fig. 3H). There were no significant differences in the numbers of fenestrae between groups 3 and 4 (P>0.05). The extent of hepatocyte necrosis and inflammation was less so in groups 3 and 4 compared with group 2.
Figure 3.

CCl4-stimulates SEC capillarization, cholangiole extension and decreased hepatocyte microvilli. Vatalanib attenuated SEC capillarization and decreased the damage in cholangioles, microvilli and cell junctions between hepatocytes. Representative images representing different fields of views of the four groups. Group 1 exhibiting (A) normal SECs, fenestrae and (B) cell junctions between hepatocytes. Group 2 was in a fibrotic state and exhibited (C) disappearance of SEC fenestrae and the appearance of a basement membrane, and (D) disappearance of cell junctions with cholangiole extension, and karyopyknosis in hepatocytes. Group 3, treated with vatalanib (6 weeks, 50 mg/kg) presented with (E) fenestrae of SECs similar to those of normal control mice and (F) cell junctions between hepatocytes similar to normal control mice. Group 4 treated with vatalanib (4 weeks, 50 mg/kg) demonstrated (G) fenestrae of SECs similar to normal control mice and (H) cell junctions between hepatocytes similar to normal control mice. Magnification, ×12,000. CCl4, carbon tetrachloride; SEC, sinusoidal endothelial cell.

Table IV.

Quantitation of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell fenestrae.

GroupNumber of fenestrae
1 (n=7)7.43±0.98
2 (n=8)2.38±0.91
3 (n=8)4.75±0.71[a]
4 (n=8)3.88±0.64[a]

P<0.01 vs. group 2.

Vatalanib was associated with decreased collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 mRNA levels

mRNA expression levels of collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 were increased in group 2 compared with group 1 (P<0.01; Fig. 4). mRNA levels were reduced in groups 3 and 4 compared with group 2 (P<0.01).
Figure 4.

Vatalanib inhibits mRNA expression levels of collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 in fibrotic mice. mRNA expression of collagen I, α-SMA, TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 were determined by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction in the livers treated with or without vatalanib. Data were normalized to the internal control (GAPDH) and are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.01 vs. CCl4 group. α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; CCl4, carbon tetrachloride.

Discussion

Intrahepatic hypoxia may occur during the liver inflammatory and fibrotic processes that characterize several chronic liver diseases (26). As a consequence, intrahepatic vascular angiogenesis and sinusoidal remodeling may occur in these chronic liver diseases (8,26). In previous years, numerous studies have examined the expression of various anti-angiogenic molecules in chronic liver disease (26). Among these molecules, VEGF and its receptors are of the most important, and have been fully studied in terms of their roles in liver inflammation and fibrosis (26,27). Anti-VEGF treatment may represent a potential therapeutic approach in liver fibrosis and portal hypertension (10,28). Vatalanib has been previously identified to specifically block VEGF-induced phosphorylation of VEGFR-1, −2 and −3 and inhibit endothelial cell proliferation, differentiation and tumor angiogenesis (29). It is considered safe for patients in previous cancer studies (30,31). The most common grade 3 and 4 non-hematological toxicities are mucositis and alopecia (17,18,32). In addition, Liu et al (20) investigated the role of vatalanib in CCl4-induced mice. They identified that vatalanib decreases liver fibrosis in a CCl4-induced liver fibrosis model. This result is consistent with current findings. However, they examined the effect of vatalanib in liver fibrosis and HSCs, not SECs. The present study examined the effects of vatalanib on the number of hepatic SEC fenestrae, and levels of VEGFR in liver tissues. The results suggested that vatalanib may exert its effects via the VEGF signaling pathway. The present results reinforced the concept that angiogenesis has a major role in liver fibrogenesis (8,10,33,34). The underlying molecular mechanism by which vatalanib decreases liver injury remains unknown. It has been demonstrated that, in primary HSCs, vatalanib decreases the levels of α-SMA, collagen, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, and reduces cell proliferation, migration and actin filament formation. This effect was associated with inhibition of VEGF, PDGF and TGF-β1 signaling and their downstream target, protein kinase B (35). In the current study, vatalanib was identified to inhibit TGF-β1, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2. Dysfunction of SECs is likely to be one of the initial events in liver injury (36). Defenestration and capillarization of the sinusoidal endothelium may be major contributors to hepatic failure in hepatic cirrhosis (36). Two studies from 2010 suggested that intrahepatic angiogenesis and sinusoidal remodeling may be involved in sinusoidal resistance, fibrosis and portal hypertension (11,37). In the present study, vatalanib altered the SEC phenotype, leading to decreased sinusoidal capillarization. Microvilli disappearance, inflammation, hepatocyte necrosis and bile duct alterations were decreased in all vatalanib-treated groups. These results indicated that anti-angiogenic agents may inhibit SECs, and that they may be involved in sinusoidal capillarization and hepatocyte damage. SECs may be potential target cells in the inhibition of this process. Furthermore, it is understood that paracrine signaling between SECs and HSCs regulates fibrogenesis, angiogenesis and portal hypertension in chronic liver disease (8,9,14,38). In the present study, the underlying mechanism of vatalanib on SECs was not addressed. Therefore, the nature of the interactions between SECs and HSCs in chronic liver disease following vatalanib treatment requires further investigation. In conclusion, vatalanib treatment was associated with decreased hepatic sinusoidal capillarization, hepatocyte damage and liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced fibrotic mice. Vatalanib may represent a potential therapeutic agent for counteracting hepatic fibrosis.
  38 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Complementary vascular and matrix regulatory pathways underlie the beneficial mechanism of action of sorafenib in liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Dominique Thabut; Chittaranjan Routray; Gwen Lomberk; Uday Shergill; Kevin Glaser; Robert Huebert; Leena Patel; Tetyana Masyuk; Boris Blechacz; Andrew Vercnocke; Erik Ritman; Richard Ehman; Raul Urrutia; Vijay Shah
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 3.  Advances in antifibrotic therapy.

Authors:  Zahra Ghiassi-Nejad; Scott L Friedman
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.869

4.  Beneficial effects of sorafenib on splanchnic, intrahepatic, and portocollateral circulations in portal hypertensive and cirrhotic rats.

Authors:  Marc Mejias; Ester Garcia-Pras; Carolina Tiani; Rosa Miquel; Jaime Bosch; Mercedes Fernandez
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Differential effects of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor PTK787/ZK222584 on tumor angiogenesis and tumor lymphangiogenesis.

Authors:  Tibor Schomber; Adrian Zumsteg; Karin Strittmatter; Ivana Crnic; Helena Antoniadis; Amanda Littlewood-Evans; Jeanette Wood; Gerhard Christofori
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Endostar, a novel human recombinant endostatin, attenuates liver fibrosis in CCl4-induced mice.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Dian-Gang Liu; Guang Yang; Ling-Jian Kong; Ya-Ju Du; Hang-Yu Wang; Feng-Dong Li; Feng-Hua Pei; Ji-Tao Song; Yu-Jing Fan; Ai-Yun Liu; Xin-Hong Wang; Bao-Xin Li
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-05-28

Review 7.  Angiogenesis in chronic inflammatory liver disease.

Authors:  Jesús Medina; Alicia G Arroyo; Francisco Sánchez-Madrid; Ricardo Moreno-Otero
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 17.425

8.  Hepatitis B virus infection in clustering of infection in families with unfavorable prognoses in northwest China.

Authors:  Yuan Yang; Li Jin; Ying-Li He; Ke Wang; Xiao-Hua Ma; Jing Wang; Zhi Yan; Yu-Ling Feng; Yong-Qin Li; Tian-Yan Chen; Hong-Li Liu; Ying-Ren Zhao
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.327

Review 9.  Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: PTK787/ZK 222584.

Authors:  Anne L Thomas; Bruno Morgan; Joachim Drevs; Clemens Unger; Bertram Wiedenmann; Udo Vanhoefer; Dirk Laurent; Margaret Dugan; William P Steward
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Anti-VEGF receptor-2 monoclonal antibody prevents portal-systemic collateral vessel formation in portal hypertensive mice.

Authors:  Mercedes Fernandez; Francesco Vizzutti; Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan; Juan Rodes; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells are implicated in multiple fibrotic mechanisms.

Authors:  Heming Ma; Xu Liu; Mingyuan Zhang; Junqi Niu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Therapeutic molecular targets of SSc-ILD.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Jörg Hw Distler
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2020-01-22

Review 3.  Development of antifibrotic therapy for stricturing Crohn's disease: lessons from randomized trials in other fibrotic diseases.

Authors:  Si-Nan Lin; Ren Mao; Chenchen Qian; Dominik Bettenworth; Jie Wang; Jiannan Li; David H Bruining; Vipul Jairath; Brian G Feagan; Min-Hu Chen; Florian Rieder
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  Amelioration of Single Clove Black Garlic Aqueous Extract on Dyslipidemia and Hepatitis in Chronic Carbon Tetrachloride Intoxicated Swiss Albino Mice.

Authors:  Gia-Buu Tran; Sao-Mai Dam; Nghia-Thu Tram Le
Journal:  Int J Hepatol       Date:  2018-05-02

5.  Anti-fibrosis activity of combination therapy with epigallocatechin gallate, taurine and genistein by regulating glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and ribosomal and lysosomal signaling pathways in HSC-T6 cells.

Authors:  Yan Li; Min Zhu; Yani Huo; Xuerong Zhang; Ming Liao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Carvedilol attenuates carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis and hepatic sinusoidal capillarization in mice.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Zhen Li; Ai-Yuan Xiu; Dong-Xiao Meng; Si-Ning Wang; Chun-Qing Zhang
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Effect of Curcumol on the Fenestrae of Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells Based on NF-κB Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Yang Zheng; Jiahui Wang; Jiaru Wang; Haiyuan Xie; Tiejian Zhao
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Lenvatinib prevents liver fibrosis by inhibiting hepatic stellate cell activation and sinusoidal capillarization in experimental liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Ogawa; Kosuke Kaji; Norihisa Nishimura; Hirotetsu Takagi; Koji Ishida; Hiroaki Takaya; Hideto Kawaratani; Kei Moriya; Tadashi Namisaki; Takemi Akahane; Hitoshi Yoshiji
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking of new series of antitumor and apoptosis inducers designed as VEGFR-2 inhibitors.

Authors:  Abdallah E Abdallah; Reda R Mabrouk; Maged Mohammed Saleh Al Ward; Sally I Eissa; Eslam B Elkaeed; Ahmed B M Mehany; Mariam A Abo-Saif; Ola A El-Feky; Mohamed S Alesawy; Mohamed Ayman El-Zahabi
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.051

Review 10.  The Provocative Roles of Platelets in Liver Disease and Cancer.

Authors:  Preeti Kanikarla Marie; Natalie W Fowlkes; Vahid Afshar-Kharghan; Stephanie L Martch; Alexey Sorokin; John Paul Shen; Van K Morris; Arvind Dasari; Nancy You; Anil K Sood; Michael J Overman; Scott Kopetz; David George Menter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.