Literature DB >> 28447148

Absent pedicles in campomelic dysplasia.

Michael M McDowell1, Ozgur Dede2, Patrick Bosch2, Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study is to report a case of campomelic dysplasia illustrating the absence of cervical and thoracic pedicles. This report reiterates the importance of this clinical peculiarity in the setting of spine instrumentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year-old female patient with campomelic dysplasia presented with progressive kyphoscoliosis and signs of neural compromise. Imaging studies confirmed thoracic level stenosis and demonstrated absence of multiple pedicles in cervical and thoracic spine. The patient underwent decompression and instrumentation/fusion for her spinal deformity.
RESULTS: The patient was instrumented between C2 and L4 with pedicle screws and sublaminar cables. However, pedicle fixation was not possible for the lower cervical and upper-mid thoracic spine. Also, floating posterior elements precluded the use of laminar fixation in the lower cervical spine. Cervicothoracic lumbosacral orthosis (CTLSO) was used for external immobilization to supplement the tenuous fixation in the cervicothoracic area. The patient improved neurologically with no signs of implant failure at the 2-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Absence of pedicles and floating posterior elements present a challenge during spine surgery in campomelic dysplasia. Surgeons should prepare for alternative fixation methods and external immobilization when planning on spinal instrumentation in affected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case Report.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campomelic; Camptomelic; Dysplastic; Kyphoscoliosis; Pediatric; Skeletal dyplasia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447148     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-017-3375-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  16 in total

1.  The phenotype of survivors of campomelic dysplasia.

Authors:  S Mansour; A C Offiah; S McDowall; P Sim; J Tolmie; C Hall
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Camptomelic dwarfism. Report of a case and review of the salient features.

Authors:  D S Weiner; G Benfield; H Robinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  SOX9 chromatin folding domains correlate with its real and putative distant cis-regulatory elements.

Authors:  Marta Smyk; Kadir Caner Akdemir; Paweł Stankiewicz
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.197

4.  Clinical Utility Gene Card for: campomelic dysplasia.

Authors:  Gerd Scherer; Bernhard Zabel; Gen Nishimura
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Camptomelic dwarfism.

Authors:  J W Bianchine; H M Risemberg; S S Kanderian; H E Harrison
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Acampomelic campomelic dysplasia with SOX9 mutation.

Authors:  M K Thong; G Scherer; K Kozlowski; E Haan; L Morris
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-08-28

7.  Orthopaedic problems associated with survival in campomelic dysplasia.

Authors:  S Ray; J R Bowen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A clinical and genetic study of campomelic dysplasia.

Authors:  S Mansour; C M Hall; M E Pembrey; I D Young
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 9.  The campomelic syndrome: review, report of 17 cases, and follow-up on the currently 17-year-old boy first reported by Maroteaux et al in 1971.

Authors:  C S Houston; J M Opitz; J W Spranger; R I Macpherson; M H Reed; E F Gilbert; J Herrmann; A Schinzel
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1983-05

Review 10.  Spinal abnormalities in camptomelic dysplasia.

Authors:  M F Coscia; G S Bassett; J R Bowen; J W Ogilvie; R B Winter; S C Simonton
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.