F Greiner1, D Brammen2,3, M Kulla4, F Walcher2, B Erdmann5. 1. Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. felix.greiner@med.ovgu.de. 2. Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. 3. Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Magdeburg, Deutschland. 4. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Sektion Notfallmedizin, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland. 5. Zentrale Notfallaufnahme, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The point of entry of a patient in emergency care is a symptom or a complaint. To evaluate subsequent processes in an emergency department until a diagnosis is made, this information has to be taken into account. OBJECTIVES: We report the introduction of coded presenting complaints into the electronic medical record system of an emergency department and describe the patients based on these data. METHODS: The CEDIS presenting complaint list was integrated into the emergency department information system of an emergency department (38,000 patients/year). After 8 months, we performed an exploratory analysis of the most common presenting complaints. Furthermore, we identified the most frequent diagnoses for presenting complaint "shortness of breath" and the most frequent presenting complaints for the diagnosis of sepsis. RESULTS: After implementing the presenting complaint list, a presenting complaint code was assigned to each patient. In our sample (26,330 cases), "extremity pain and injury" comprised the largest group of patients (29.5%). "Chest pain-cardiac features" (3.7%) and "extremity weakness/symptoms of cerebrovascular accident" (2.4%) were the main cardiac and neurologic complaints, respectively. They were mostly triaged as urgent (>80%) and hospitalized in critical care units (>50%). The main diagnosis for presenting complaint "shortness of breath" was heart failure (25.1%), while the main presenting complaint for the diagnosis sepsis was "shortness of breath" (18.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Containing 171 presenting complaints, this classification was implemented successfully without providing extensive staff training. The documentation of coded presenting complaints enables symptom-based analysis of the health care provided in emergency departments.
BACKGROUND: The point of entry of a patient in emergency care is a symptom or a complaint. To evaluate subsequent processes in an emergency department until a diagnosis is made, this information has to be taken into account. OBJECTIVES: We report the introduction of coded presenting complaints into the electronic medical record system of an emergency department and describe the patients based on these data. METHODS: The CEDIS presenting complaint list was integrated into the emergency department information system of an emergency department (38,000 patients/year). After 8 months, we performed an exploratory analysis of the most common presenting complaints. Furthermore, we identified the most frequent diagnoses for presenting complaint "shortness of breath" and the most frequent presenting complaints for the diagnosis of sepsis. RESULTS: After implementing the presenting complaint list, a presenting complaint code was assigned to each patient. In our sample (26,330 cases), "extremity pain and injury" comprised the largest group of patients (29.5%). "Chest pain-cardiac features" (3.7%) and "extremity weakness/symptoms of cerebrovascular accident" (2.4%) were the main cardiac and neurologic complaints, respectively. They were mostly triaged as urgent (>80%) and hospitalized in critical care units (>50%). The main diagnosis for presenting complaint "shortness of breath" was heart failure (25.1%), while the main presenting complaint for the diagnosis sepsis was "shortness of breath" (18.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Containing 171 presenting complaints, this classification was implemented successfully without providing extensive staff training. The documentation of coded presenting complaints enables symptom-based analysis of the health care provided in emergency departments.
Entities:
Keywords:
Documentation; Emergency department; Epidemiology; Health care research; Presenting complaint
Authors: Christian W Hamm; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Stefan Agewall; Jeroen Bax; Eric Boersma; Hector Bueno; Pio Caso; Dariusz Dudek; Stephan Gielen; Kurt Huber; Magnus Ohman; Mark C Petrie; Frank Sonntag; Miguel Sousa Uva; Robert F Storey; William Wijns; Doron Zahger Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ph Gabriel Steg; Stefan K James; Dan Atar; Luigi P Badano; Carina Blömstrom-Lundqvist; Michael A Borger; Carlo Di Mario; Kenneth Dickstein; Gregory Ducrocq; Francisco Fernandez-Aviles; Anthony H Gershlick; Pantaleo Giannuzzi; Sigrun Halvorsen; Kurt Huber; Peter Juni; Adnan Kastrati; Juhani Knuuti; Mattie J Lenzen; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Marco Valgimigli; Arnoud van 't Hof; Petr Widimsky; Doron Zahger Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Martin Mockel; Julia Searle; Reinhold Muller; Anna Slagman; Harald Storchmann; Philipp Oestereich; Werner Wyrwich; Angela Ale-Abaei; Joern O Vollert; Matthias Koch; Rajan Somasundaram Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: F Walcher; M Kulla; S Klinger; R Röhrig; H Wyen; M Bernhard; I Gräff; U Nienaber; P Petersen; H Himmelreich; U Schweigkofler; I Marzi; R Lefering Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Benjamin Lucas; Peter Schladitz; Wiebke Schirrmeister; Gerald Pliske; Felix Walcher; Martin Kulla; Dominik Brammen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: D Brammen; F Greiner; M Kulla; R Otto; W Schirrmeister; S Thun; S E Drösler; J Pollmanns; S C Semler; R Lefering; V S Thiemann; R W Majeed; K U Heitmann; R Röhrig; F Walcher Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: Felix Greiner; Anna Slagman; Christoph Stallmann; Stefanie March; Johannes Pollmanns; Patrik Dröge; Christian Günster; Marie-Luise Rosenbusch; Joachim Heuer; Saskia E Drösler; Felix Walcher; Dominik Brammen Journal: Gesundheitswesen Date: 2019-10-09