Literature DB >> 28446579

Modulation of long-latency afferent inhibition by the amplitude of sensory afferent volley.

Claudia V Turco1, Jenin El-Sayes1, Hunter J Fassett1, Robert Chen2, Aimee J Nelson3.   

Abstract

Long-latency afferent inhibition (LAI) is the inhibition of the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor-evoked potentials (MEP) by the sensory afferent volley following electrical stimulation of a peripheral nerve. It is unknown how the activation of sensory afferent fibers relates to the magnitude of LAI. This study investigated the relationship between LAI and the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) from the median nerve (MN) and the digital nerves (DN) of the second digit. LAI was obtained by delivering nerve stimulation 200 ms before a TMS pulse delivered over the motor cortex. Experiment 1 assessed the magnitude of LAI following stimulation of the contralateral MN or DN using nerve stimulus intensities relative to the maximum SNAP (SNAPmax) of that nerve and two TMS intensities (0.5- and 1-mV MEP). Results indicate that MN LAI is maximal at ~50% SNAPmax, when presumably all sensory afferents are recruited for TMS of 0.5-mV MEP. For DN, LAI appears at ~50% SNAPmax and does not increase with further recruitment of sensory afferents. Experiment 2 investigated the magnitude of LAI following ipsilateral nerve stimulation at intensities relative to SNAPmax Results show minimal LAI evoked by ipsilateral MN and no LAI following ipsilateral DN stimulation. Implications for future studies investigating LAI include adjusting nerve stimulation to 50% SNAPmax to obtain maximal LAI. Additionally, MN LAI can be used as a marker for neurological disease or injury by using a nerve stimulation intensity that can evoke a depth of LAI capable of increasing or decreasing.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first investigation of the relationship between long-latency afferent inhibition (LAI) and the sensory afferent volley. Differences exist between median and digital nerve LAI. For the median nerve, LAI increases until all sensory fibers are presumably recruited. In contrast, digital nerve LAI does not increase with the recruitment of additional sensory fibers but rather is present when a given volume of sensory afferent fibers is recruited (~50% of maximum sensory nerve action potential). This novel data provide practical guidelines and contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying LAI.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LAI; TMS; afferent volley; sensory nerve action potential

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28446579      PMCID: PMC5511865          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00118.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  29 in total

1.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of somatosensory cortex activity produced by electrical stimulation of the median nerve or tactile stimulation of the index finger.

Authors:  M Boakye; S C Huckins; N M Szeverenyi; B I Taskey; C J Hodge
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  I-wave origin and modulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; P Profice; F Ranieri; F Capone; M Dileone; A Oliviero; F Pilato
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Anatomy of the palmar branch of the ulnar nerve: application to ulnar and median nerve decompressive surgery.

Authors:  R Shane Tubbs; Jason M Rogers; Marios Loukas; Ayhan Cömert; Mohammadali M Shoja; Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in different current directions activates separate cortical circuits.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Samer Charab; Carolyn Gunraj; Aimee J Nelson; Kaviraja Udupa; I-Jin Yeh; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Modulation of motor cortex excitability by median nerve and digit stimulation.

Authors:  R Chen; B Corwell; M Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Acute effects of muscle vibration on sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  Thomas Lapole; Jérémy Tindel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reduced Short- and Long-Latency Afferent Inhibition Following Acute Muscle Pain: A Potential Role in the Recovery of Motor Output.

Authors:  Emma Burns; Lucinda Sian Chipchase; Siobhan May Schabrun
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Abnormalities of sensorimotor integration in focal dystonia: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; R Marchese; A Buccolieri; B Gasparetto; C Trompetto
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 10.  Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Samra Mian; Tetyana Kendzerska; Melissa French
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

View more
  3 in total

1.  The distribution and reliability of TMS-evoked short- and long-latency afferent interactions.

Authors:  Stephen L Toepp; Claudia V Turco; Ravjot S Rehsi; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Preserved central cholinergic functioning to transcranial magnetic stimulation in de novo patients with celiac disease.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lanza; Francesco Fisicaro; Carmela Cinzia D'Agate; Raffaele Ferri; Mariagiovanna Cantone; Luca Falzone; Giovanni Pennisi; Rita Bella; Marios Hadjivassiliou; Manuela Pennisi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Exploring Behavioral Correlates of Afferent Inhibition.

Authors:  Claudia V Turco; Mitchell B Locke; Jenin El-Sayes; Mark Tommerdahl; Aimee J Nelson
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-04-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.