Literature DB >> 28446116

Risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates for stroke: evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR).

Dominique A Cadilhac1, Monique F Kilkenny2, Christopher R Levi3, Natasha A Lannin4, Amanda G Thrift2, Joosup Kim2, Brenda Grabsch5, Leonid Churilov5, Helen M Dewey6, Kelvin Hill7, Steven G Faux8, Rohan Grimley9, Helen Castley10, Peter J Hand11, Andrew Wong12, Geoffrey K Herkes13, Melissa Gill14, Douglas Crompton15, Sandy Middleton16, Geoffrey A Donnan5, Craig S Anderson17.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hospital data used to assess regional variability in disease management and outcomes, including mortality, lack information on disease severity. We describe variance between hospitals in 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates (RAMRs) for stroke, comparing models that include or exclude stroke severity as a covariate.
DESIGN: Cohort design linking Australian Stroke Clinical Registry data with national death registrations. Multivariable models using recommended statistical methods for calculating 30-day RAMRs for hospitals, adjusted for demographic factors, ability to walk on admission, stroke type, and stroke recurrence.
SETTING: Australian hospitals providing at least 200 episodes of acute stroke care, 2009-2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital RAMRs estimated by different models. Changes in hospital rank order and funnel plots were used to explore variation in hospital-specific 30-day RAMRs; that is, RAMRs more than three standard deviations from the mean.
RESULTS: In the 28 hospitals reporting at least 200 episodes of care, there were 16 218 episodes (15 951 patients; median age, 77 years; women, 46%; ischaemic strokes, 79%). RAMRs from models not including stroke severity as a variable ranged between 8% and 20%; RAMRs from models with the best fit, which included ability to walk and stroke recurrence as variables, ranged between 9% and 21%. The rank order of hospitals changed according to the covariates included in the models, particularly for those hospitals with the highest RAMRs. Funnel plots identified significant deviation from the mean overall RAMR for two hospitals, including one with borderline excess mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital stroke mortality rates and hospital performance ranking may vary widely according to the covariates included in the statistical analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28446116     DOI: 10.5694/mja16.00525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  Effect of Comorbidity Assessed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index on the Length of Stay, Costs and Mortality among Older Adults Hospitalised for Acute Stroke.

Authors:  Richard Ofori-Asenso; Ella Zomer; Ken Lee Chin; Si Si; Peter Markey; Mark Tacey; Andrea J Curtis; Sophia Zoungas; Danny Liew
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The impact of disease severity adjustment on hospital standardised mortality ratios: Results from a service-wide analysis of ischaemic stroke admissions using linked pre-hospital, admissions and mortality data.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Chris Goumas; Bin Jalaludin; John Worthington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Hospital use in survivors of transient ischaemic attack compared with survivors of stroke in central China: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Sangsang Li; Qingfeng Tian; Junxing Fan; Zhan Shi; Bingxin Guo; Huanan Chen; Yapeng Li; Songhe Shi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Ashika D Maharaj; Karolina Krysinska; Joanne Dean; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2019-12-10

5.  Regional differences in the care and outcomes of acute stroke patients in Australia: an observational study using evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR).

Authors:  Mitchell Dwyer; Karen Francis; Gregory M Peterson; Karen Ford; Seana Gall; Hoang Phan; Helen Castley; Lillian Wong; Richard White; Fiona Ryan; Lauren Arthurson; Joosup Kim; Dominique A Cadilhac; Natasha A Lannin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  The Allure of Big Data to Improve Stroke Outcomes: Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Muideen T Olaiya; Nita Sodhi-Berry; Lachlan L Dalli; Kiran Bam; Amanda G Thrift; Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Lee Nedkoff; Joosup Kim; Monique F Kilkenny
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Claire Bavor; Lucy Marsh; Joanne Dean; Oliver Daly; Dora Vasiliadis; Susannah Ahern
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.440

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.