Literature DB >> 28445228

The Relationship of Core Strength and Activation and Performance on Three Functional Movement Screens.

Caleb D Johnson1, Paul N Whitehead1, Erin R Pletcher1, Mallory S Faherty2, Mita T Lovalekar1, Shawn R Eagle1, Karen A Keenan1.   

Abstract

Johnson, CD, Whitehead, PN, Pletcher, ER, Faherty, MS, Lovalekar, MT, Eagle, SR, and Keenan, KA. The relationship of core strength and activation and performance on three functional movement screens. J Strength Cond Res 32(4): 1166-1173, 2018-Current measures of core stability used by clinicians and researchers suffer from several shortcomings. Three functional movement screens appear, at face-value, to be dependent on the ability to activate and control core musculature. These 3 screens may present a viable alternative to current measures of core stability. Thirty-nine subjects completed a deep squat, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability screen. Scores on the 3 screens were summed to calculate a composite score (COMP). During the screens, muscle activity was collected to determine the length of time that the bilateral erector spinae, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and gluteus medius muscles were active. Strength was assessed for core muscles (trunk flexion and extension, trunk rotation, and hip abduction and adduction) and accessory muscles (knee flexion and extension and pectoralis major). Two ordinal logistic regression equations were calculated with COMP as the outcome variable, and: (a) core strength and accessory strength, (b) only core strength. The first model was significant in predicting COMP (p = 0.004) (Pearson's Chi-Square = 149.132, p = 0.435; Nagelkerke's R-Squared = 0.369). The second model was significant in predicting COMP (p = 0.001) (Pearson's Chi-Square = 148.837, p = 0.488; Nagelkerke's R-Squared = 0.362). The core muscles were found to be active for most screens, with percentages of "time active" for each muscle ranging from 54-86%. In conclusion, performance on the 3 screens is predicted by core strength, even when accounting for "accessory" strength variables. Furthermore, it seems the screens elicit wide-ranging activation of core muscles. Although more investigation is needed, these screens, collectively, seem to be a good assessment of core strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28445228     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  The Effect of a Novel Training Program to Improve Trunk Stability Push Up Performance in Active Females: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kate Schwartzkopf-Phifer; Suzanne Leach; Katie Whetstone; Kevin Brown; Kyle Matsel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-10-01

2.  FUNDAMENTAL MOVEMENT AND DYNAMIC BALANCE DISPARITIES AMONG VARYING SKILL LEVELS IN GOLFERS.

Authors:  Sean Krysak; Christopher R Harnish; Phillip J Plisky; Amy M Knab; Garrett S Bullock
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07

3.  Does the performance of five back-associated exercises relate to the presence of low back pain? A cross-sectional observational investigation in regional Australian council workers.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Jonathan Hoffman; Jason Osborne; E-Liisa Laakso; Markus Melloh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Core Endurance Relationships With Athletic and Functional Performance in Inactive People.

Authors:  Marta Silva Santos; David G Behm; David Barbado; Josimari Melo DeSantana; Marzo Edir Da Silva-Grigoletto
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.