| Literature DB >> 28444615 |
Seema Malhotra1, Kiran Preet1, Arvind Tomar2, Shweta Rawat1, Sayar Singh1, Inderjeet Singh1, L Robert Varte1, Tirthankar Chatterjee1, M S Pal1, Soma Sarkar3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gorkhas, a sub-mountainous population of the Himalayan region, are known for strength and bravery. In the present study when "Gorkha" is used without brackets, we are mentioning Gorkhas of Tibeto-Burman origin. Physical capability, strength and endurance are important components of fitness associated with genetic traits. The aim of this study was to examine the endurance potential of male Gorkha soldiers, based on endurance-related genetic markers ACE I/D, ACTN3 Arg (R)577Ter(X), CKMM A/G NcoI and eNOS Glu(G)298Asp(T).Entities:
Keywords: ACE; ACTN3; CKMM; Endurance; Gorkha; Indian; Polygenic; eNOS
Year: 2017 PMID: 28444615 PMCID: PMC5405041 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-017-0085-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Med Open ISSN: 2198-9761
Details of participants based on ethno-linguistic grouping (n = 394)
| Group | Region of origin | Linguistic phylum and linguistic clustera |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gurung | Nepal | TB, Tamangic | 28 |
| Gurung | India | 47 | |
| Magar | Nepal | TB, Magaric | 25 |
| Magar | India | 101 | |
| Rai | Nepal | TB, Kirantic | 37 |
| Rai | India | 37 | |
| Tamang | Nepal | TB, Tamangic | 36 |
| Tamang | India | 18 | |
| Limbu | Nepal | TB, Kirantic | 25 |
| Limbu | India | 40 |
Note: Of the 394 participants, 20 individuals were hypertensive and excluded from subsequent studies. The participants were two Gurungs (one from Nepal and one from India), three Magars (two from Nepal and one from India), nine Rais (six from Nepal and three from India), one Tamang (from Nepal) and five Limbus (three from Nepal and one from India)
TB Tibeto-Burman
aClassification according to van Driem [24]
Gene variants studied for endurance status
| Gene | Location | Polymorphism | Endurance-related marker | Minor allele frequency (MAF) (1000 Genomes) | Ancestral allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 17q23.3 |
|
| NA | NA |
|
| 11q13.1 |
|
|
| C |
|
| 19q13.32 |
|
|
| T |
|
| 7q36 |
|
|
| G |
Physiological characteristics of the male Gorkha soldiers (TB) (n = 374)
| Characteristics | Overall | Gurung | Magar | Rai | Tamang | Limbu |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||
| Body weight (Kg) | 64.51 ± 7.53 | 65.64 ± 6.8 | 63.43 ± 6.64 | 65.89 ± 7.95 | 63.19 ± 7.69 | 65.10 ± 9 | 0.057 |
| Height (cm) | 165.43 ± 5.01 | 165.65 ± 5.84 | 165.49 ± 4.91 | 164.24 ± 05.32 | 166.02 ± 4.29 | 165.73 ± 4.38 | 0.390 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 23.49 ± 2.99 | 23.94 ± 3.59 | 23.00 ± 3.15 | 24.34 ± 2.28 | 22.9 ± 2.52 | 23.64 ± 2.69 |
|
| SBP (mmHg) | 121.10 ± 12.09 | 125.21 ± 11.75 | 121.91 ± 11.57 | 121.03 ± 13.02 | 117.80 ± 11.03 | 119.92 ± 12.27 |
|
| DBP (mmHg) | 73.79 ± 9.99 | 71.57 ± 11.5 | 71.16 ± 10.24 | 77.23 ± 10 | 72.30 ± 8.36 | 76.23 ± 8.02 |
|
| HR (rate/min) | 69.35 ± 12.37 | 69.75 ± 12.88 | 68.20 ± 11.5 | 71.10 ± 15.34 | 66.75 ± 11.11 | 70.85 ± 9.43 | 0.894 |
Values are mean ± SD, significant value <0.05. The significant p values are italicized
The values are from participants who were normotensive
BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, TB Tibeto-Burman
Comparison of VO2max between Gorkha groups
| Group ID | Group | VO2max (ml kg−1 min−1) | Group comparison | Level of significance ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | – | – | 50.82 ± 7.92 | ||
| 1 | Gurung (31) | 46.56 ± 8.18 | 1 vs 2 | ns | |
| 2 | Magar (32) | 47.97 ± 6.08 | 1 vs 3 |
| |
| 3 | Rai (23) | 52.86 ± 6.19 | 1 vs 4 |
| |
| 4 | Tamang (18) | 55.80 ± 8.27 | 1 vs 5 |
| |
| 5 | Limbu (18) | 55.34 ± 6.26 | 2 vs 3 | ns | |
| 2 vs 4 | ns | ||||
| 2 vs 5 |
| ||||
| 3 vs 4 | ns | ||||
| 3 vs 5 | ns | ||||
| 4 vs 5 | ns |
VO2max values are mean ± SD. Level of significance calculated by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test. VO2max values are from normotensive participants. Number in parenthesis indicates the number of participants in each group
p value <0.05 significant. The significant p values are italicized
ns not significant
Frequency distribution of the polymorphisms in the male Gorkha soldiers (Tibeto-Burman)
| SNP | Variants | Overall | (1) Gurung | (2) Magar | (3) Rai | (4) Tamang | (5) Limbu | Comparison of groups | Genotypica frequency | Alleleb frequency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Level of significance ( | ||||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | |||||||||
|
| 0.427 | 0.465 | 0.349 | 0.466 | 0.509 | 0.430 | 1 vs 2 | 0.14 | 0.04 | ||
|
| 0.467 | 0.438 | 0.471 | 0.466 | 0.452 | 0.507 | 1 vs 3 | 0.81 | 0.37 | ||
|
| 0.104 | 0.095 | 0.178 | 0.066 | 0.037 | 0.061 | 1 vs 4 | 0.45 | 0.38 | ||
| Allele | 1 vs 5 | 0.62 | 0.99 | ||||||||
|
| 0.671 | 0.684 | 0.585 | 0.700 | 0.735 | 0.684 | 2 vs 3 | 0.08 | 0.03 | ||
|
| 0.338 | 0.315 | 0.414 | 0.300 | 0.264 | 0.315 | 4 vs 2 | 0.02 | 0.007 | ||
| 2 vs 5 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |||||||||
| HWE | 0.381 | 0.893 | 0.751 | 0.389 | 0.230 | 0.156 | 3 vs 4 | 0.75 | 0.55 | ||
| 3 vs 5 | 0.90 | 0.79 | |||||||||
| 4 vs 5 | 0.63 | 0.38 | |||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | |||||||||
|
| 0.366 | 0.397 | 0.308 | 0.366 | 0.396 | 0.413 | 1 vs 2 | 0.33 | 0.13 | ||
|
| 0.478 | 0.465 | 0.487 | 0.466 | 0.471 | 0.492 | 1 vs 3 | 0.87 | 0.61 | ||
|
| 0.155 | 0.139 | 0.203 | 0.166 | 0.132 | 0.092 | 1 vs 4 | 0.99 | 0.97 | ||
| Allele | 1 vs 5 | 0.71 | 0.58 | ||||||||
|
| 0.605 | 0.630 | 0.552 | 0.600 | 0.632 | 0.661 | 2 vs 3 | 0.69 | 0.39 | ||
|
| 0.394 | 0.369 | 0.447 | 0.400 | 0.367 | 0.338 | 4 vs 2 | 0.38 | 0.16 | ||
| 2 vs 5 | 0.10 | 0.04 | |||||||||
| HWE | 0.970 | 0.99 | 0.882 | 0.829 | 0.917 | 0.423 | 3 vs 4 | 0.86 | 0.62 | ||
| 3 vs 5 | 0.45 | 0.31 | |||||||||
| 4 vs 5 | 0.79 | 0.63 | |||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | |||||||||
|
| 0.655 | 0.630 | 0.634 | 0.833 | 0.603 | 0.600 | 1 vs 2 | 0.89 | 0.86 | ||
|
| 0.296 | 0.287 | 0.300 | 0.150 | 0.377 | 0.369 | 1 vs 3 | 0.02 | 0.003 | ||
|
| 0.048 | 0.082 | 0.065 | 0.016 | 0.018 | 0.030 | 1 vs 4 | 0.22 | 0.72 | ||
| Allele | 1 vs 5 | 0.31 | 0.83 | ||||||||
|
| 0.803 | 0.773 | 0.784 | 0.908 | 0.792 | 0.784 | 2 vs 3 | 0.02 | 0.003 | ||
|
| 0.196 | 0.226 | 0.215 | 0.091 | 0.207 | 0.215 | 4 vs 2 | 0.32 | 0.86 | ||
| 2 vs 5 | 0.44 | 0.99 | |||||||||
| HWE | 0.244 | 0.280 | 0.221 | 0.442 | 0.283 | 0.456 | 3 vs 4 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||
| 3 vs 5 | 0.01 | 0.007 | |||||||||
| 4 vs 5 | 0.91 | 0.88 | |||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | |||||||||
|
| 0.799 | 0.808 | 0.756 | 0.766 | 0.830 | 0.876 | 1 vs 2 | 0.59 | 0.30 | ||
|
| 0.184 | 0.178 | 0.211 | 0.216 | 0.169 | 0.123 | 1 vs 3 | 0.84 | 0.37 | ||
|
| 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.032 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1 vs 4 | 0.68 | 0.63 | ||
| Allele | 1 vs 5 | 0.41 | 0.21 | ||||||||
|
| 0.892 | 0.897 | 0.862 | 0.775 | 0.915 | 0.938 | 2 vs 3 | 0.82 | 0.98 | ||
|
| 0.108 | 0.103 | 0.138 | 0.125 | 0.085 | 0.062 | 4 vs 2 | 0.31 | 0.16 | ||
| 2 vs 5 | 0.09 | 0.02 | |||||||||
| HWE | 0.387 | 0.770 | 0.211 | 0.941 | 0.499 | 0.597 | 3 vs 4 | 0.51 | 0.21 | ||
| 3 vs 5 | 0.20 | 0.04 | |||||||||
| 4 vs 5 | 0.47 | 0.48 | |||||||||
Significance is assumed when p ≤ 0.0025 after Bonferroni’s correction (alpha = 0.05/20, for four polymorphisms × five ethnic groups)
HWE Hardy -Weinberg Equilibrium
aPearson values from chi-square test for genotypic frequency [http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/contingency_NROW_NCOLUMN_form.html]
b p values from Fisher’s exact test for allelic frequency [http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/statistics/fisher.htm]
Comparison of genotypic and allelic frequencies of studied polymorphisms in male soldiers belonging to Gorkha (TB), Gorkha (IA), HAN (TB) and Indian lowlander (IA)
| Gorkha (TB) | Gorkha (IA) | HAN (TB) | Indian lowlander (IA) | Gorkha (TB) vs Gorkha (IA) | Gorkha (TB) vs HAN (TB) | Gorkha (TB) vs Indian lowlander (IA) (TB) | Gorkha (IA) vs HAN lowlander (IA) | Gorkha (IA) vs Indian lowlander (IA) | HAN (TB) vs Indian | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNP | Variants | Frequency | Level of significance ( | |||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | ||||||||||
|
| 0.427 | 0.459a | 0.408a | 0.254a | ||||||||
|
| 0.467 | 0.417a | 0.551a | 0.504a | 0.525 | 0.291 |
| 0.130 |
|
| ||
|
| 0.104 | 0.122a | 0.040a | 0.240a | ||||||||
| Allele | ||||||||||||
|
| 0.671 | 0.673a | 0.683a | 0.506a | 0.676 | 0.664 |
| 0.849 |
|
| ||
|
| 0.338 | 0.326a | 0.316a | 0.493a | ||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | ||||||||||
|
| 0.366 | 0.287a | 0.189 | 0.180a | 0.094 |
|
| 0.116 | 0.160 | 0.197 | ||
|
| 0.478 | 0.490a | 0.648 | 0.555a | ||||||||
|
| 0.155 | 0.222a | 0.162 | 0.263a | ||||||||
| Allele | ||||||||||||
|
| 0.605 | 0.520a | 0.513 | 0.458a |
|
|
| 0.89 | 0.149 | 0.240 | ||
|
| 0.394 | 0.479a | 0.486 | 0.541a | ||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | ||||||||||
|
| 0.655 | 0.475 | 0.594 | 0.455 |
| 0.608 |
| 0.289 | 0.245 | 0.065 | ||
|
| 0.296 | 0.445 | 0.351 | 0.388 | ||||||||
|
| 0.048 | 0.079 | 0.054 | 0.155 | ||||||||
| Allele | ||||||||||||
|
| 0.803 | 0.698 | 0.770 | 0.650 |
| 0.357 |
| 0.133 | 0.317 |
| ||
|
| 0.196 | 0.301 | 0.230 | 0.350 | ||||||||
|
|
| Genotype | ||||||||||
|
| 0.799 | 0.653 | 0.682 | 0.648 |
| 0.223 |
| 0.674 | 0.094 | 0.861 | ||
|
| 0.184 | 0.287 | 0.292 | 0.333 | ||||||||
|
| 0.016 | 0.588 | 0.024 | 0.018 | ||||||||
| Allele | ||||||||||||
|
| 0.891 | 0.797 | 0.829 | 0.814 |
| 0.09 |
| 0.51 | 0.554 | 0.754 | ||
|
| 0.108 | 0.202 | 0.170 | 0.185 | ||||||||
TB Tibeto-Burman, IA Indo-Aryan, HAN high-altitude native from Ladakh
*Significance for genotypic and allelic frequency is assumed when p < 0.05. The significant p values are italicized
aData from [10]
Probability of possessing “optimal” genetic profile by number of polymorphism in the male Gorkha (TB) and Indian lowlander (IA) soldiers
| Polymorphisms influencing endurance performance | New gene included at each stage | Gorkha (Tibeto-Burman) | Indian lowlander | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Typical frequency (%) of “optimal” genotype | Probability of possessing ‘perfect’ profile | Typical frequency (%) of “optimal” genotype | Probability of possessing “perfect” profile | ||||
| % chance | Approximate odds ratio | % chance | Approximate odds ratio | ||||
| 1. |
| 43 | 43.00 | 1:2 | 25a | 25.00 | 1:4 |
| 2. |
| 15 | 6.45 | 1:15 | 26a | 6.50 | 1.15 |
| 3. |
| 65 | 4.19 | 1:23 | 45 | 2.99 | 1:35 |
| 4. |
| 80 | 3.35 | 1:30 | 65 | 1.88 | 1:78 |
Data obtained from a data set of 100,000 hypothetical male Gorkha (TB) and Indian lowlander (IA), each with a randomly generated genetic profile for all four polymorphisms based on the typical frequency of each genotype
TB Tibeto-Burman, IA Indo-Aryan
aGenotypic frequencies taken from [10]
Frequency distribution of “optimal” endurance genotype in male Gorkha soldiers and other male Indian soldiers
| Gene | Symbol | Polymorphism | Genotype (2 “optimal” endurance genotype) | Frequency (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gorkha (TB) | Gorkha (IA) | HAN (TB) | Indian lowlander (IA) | Gujrati Houston (GIH, IA) | Han Chinese Beijing (CHB, ST) | JPT | Caucasian (CEU) | ||||
| Angiotensin converting enzyme (Peptidyl dipeptidase A) |
|
| 0 = | 10, 47, 43 | 12, 42, 46a | 04, 55, 41a | 24, 51, 25a | – | 12, 45, 43d | 12,47,41f | 30,51,19g |
| Alpha actinin 3 |
|
| 0 = | 37, 48, 15 | 25, 52, 23a | 19, 65, 16 | 18, 56, 26a | 14, 59, 27c | 43, 39, 17c | 21, 61, 17c | 20, 58, 22 c |
| Creatine kinase, muscle |
|
| 0 = | 05, 30, 65 | 08, 45, 47 | 05, 35, 60 | 16, 39, 46 | 22, 39, 38c | 04, 34, 61c | 05, 27, 68c | 05, 43, 51 c |
| Endothelial nitric oxide synthase |
|
| 0 = | 02, 18, 80 | 06, 29, 65 | 02, 26, 72b | 02, 33, 65 | – | 0, 22, 78e | 14, 86, 0c | 08, 51, 40 c |
TB Tibeto-Burman, IA Indo-Aryan, HAN high-altitude natives from Ladakh, ST Sino-Tibetan, CHB Han Chinese, Beijing, CEU Utah residents with northern and western European ancestry, GIH Gujrati Indians in Houston, Texas, JPT Japanese in Tokyo, Japan
a, b, d, f, gValues from references [10, 23, 73–75]
cData from HapMapPhase 3
eData from the International HapMap Project
Fig. 1Frequency distribution of total genotypes score (TGS) in male Gorkha soldiers (n = 374)
Fig. 2Frequency distribution of total genotype scores (TGS) derived from dataset of 100,000 randomly generated individuals of Indian lowlanders (IA), high-altitude native (TB), Gorkhas (IA) and Gorkhas (TB)
Comparison of genotypic and allelic frequency distribution between participants of the Indian Army and general Indian population
| Indo-Aryan | Dravidian | General Population | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Army | General population | Indian Army | General population | Indian Army | General population | ||||||
| SNP | Variants | Genotype |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| 0.25a | 0.26b | 0.71 | 0.29a | 0.37e | 0.18 | |||
|
| 0.50a | 0.54b | 0.53a | 0.42e | |||||||
|
| 0.24a | 0.20b | 0.18a | 0.21e | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| 0.51a | 0.53b | 0.55 | 0.56a | 0.58e | 0.64 | |||||
|
| 0.49a | 0.46b | 0.44a | 0.42e | |||||||
|
|
|
| 0.18a | 0.16c |
| 0.24a | |||||
|
| 0.56a | 0.45c | 0.48a | NA | NA | ||||||
|
| 0.26a | 0.39c | 0.28a | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| 0.46a | 0.39c |
| 0.48a | |||||||
|
| 0.54a | 0.61c | 0.52a | ||||||||
|
|
|
| 0.64i | 0.71d | 0.12 | 0.73i | 0.74f | 0.45 | |||
|
| 0.33i | 0.27d | 0.25i | 0.26f | |||||||
|
| 0.01i | 0.07d | 0.01i | 0.00f | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| 0.81i | 0.85d | 0.90 | 0.86i | 0.87f | 0.76 | |||||
|
| 0.18i | 0.15d | 0.14i | 0.13f | |||||||
|
|
|
| 0.31g | 0.25k | 0.49 | ||||||
|
| 0.53g | 0.53k | |||||||||
|
| 0.16g | 0.22k | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| 0.56g | 0.52k | 0.25 | ||||||||
|
| 0.43g | 0.48k | |||||||||
|
|
|
| 0.62j | 0.69h | 0.35 | ||||||
|
| 0.35j | 0.31h | |||||||||
|
| 0.02j | 0.00h | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| 0.80j | 0.84h | 0.29 | ||||||||
|
| 0.20j | 0.16h | |||||||||
Data for CKMM is not available in Indian general population
NA data not available
*Significance for genotypic and allelic frequency is assumed when p < 0.05. The significant p values are italicized
a[10]; b[76]; c[77]; d[78]; e[79]; f[80]; g[23]; h[81]; iPresent study; junpublished; kvalues computed by clubbing the data from [82] and [83]