Valentina Caratto1,2, Lorenzo Ball3, Elisa Sanguineti1,2,4, Angelo Insorsi3, Iacopo Firpo3, Stefano Alberti1, Maurizio Ferretti1,2, Paolo Pelosi3. 1. Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy. 2. Istituto CNR SPIN - Genova, Italy. 3. Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy. 4. Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, dell'Ambiente e della Vita, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to assess the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa of two nanoparticle endotracheal tube coatings with visible light-induced photocatalysis. METHODS: : Two types of titanium dioxide nanoparticles were tested: standard anatase (TiO2) and N-doped TiO2 (N-TiO2). Nanoparticles were placed on the internal surface of a segment of commercial endotracheal tubes, which were loaded on a cellulose acetate filter; control endotracheal tubes were left without a nanoparticle coating. A bacterial inoculum of 150 colony forming units was placed in the endotracheal tubes and then exposed to a fluorescent light source (3700 lux, 300-700 nm wavelength) for 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 minutes. Colony forming units were counted after 24 hours of incubation at 37°C. Bacterial inactivation was calculated as the percentage reduction of bacterial growth compared to endotracheal tubes not exposed to light. RESULTS: : In the absence of light, no relevant antibacterial activity was shown against neither strain. For P. aeruginosa, both coatings had a higher bacterial inactivation than controls at any time point (p < 0.001), and no difference was observed between TiO2 and N-TiO2. For S. aureus, inactivation was higher than for controls starting at 5 minutes for N-TiO2 (p = 0.018) and 10 minutes for TiO2 (p = 0.014); inactivation with N-TiO2 was higher than that with TiO2 at 20 minutes (p < 0.001), 40 minutes (p < 0.001) and 60 minutes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: : Nanosized commercial and N-doped TiO2 inhibit bacterial growth under visible fluorescent light. N-TiO2 has higher antibacterial activity against S. aureus compared to TiO2.
OBJECTIVE: : The aim of this study was to assess the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa of two nanoparticle endotracheal tube coatings with visible light-induced photocatalysis. METHODS: : Two types of titanium dioxide nanoparticles were tested: standard anatase (TiO2) and N-doped TiO2 (N-TiO2). Nanoparticles were placed on the internal surface of a segment of commercial endotracheal tubes, which were loaded on a cellulose acetate filter; control endotracheal tubes were left without a nanoparticle coating. A bacterial inoculum of 150 colony forming units was placed in the endotracheal tubes and then exposed to a fluorescent light source (3700 lux, 300-700 nm wavelength) for 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 minutes. Colony forming units were counted after 24 hours of incubation at 37°C. Bacterial inactivation was calculated as the percentage reduction of bacterial growth compared to endotracheal tubes not exposed to light. RESULTS: : In the absence of light, no relevant antibacterial activity was shown against neither strain. For P. aeruginosa, both coatings had a higher bacterial inactivation than controls at any time point (p < 0.001), and no difference was observed between TiO2 and N-TiO2. For S. aureus, inactivation was higher than for controls starting at 5 minutes for N-TiO2 (p = 0.018) and 10 minutes for TiO2 (p = 0.014); inactivation with N-TiO2 was higher than that with TiO2 at 20 minutes (p < 0.001), 40 minutes (p < 0.001) and 60 minutes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: : Nanosized commercial and N-doped TiO2 inhibit bacterial growth under visible fluorescent light. N-TiO2 has higher antibacterial activity against S. aureus compared to TiO2.
Patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at
risk of several complications, including ventilator-associated pneumonia
(VAP).( Despite
heterogeneity in its definition,(
VAP is a disease that may affect as many as a quarter of all mechanically ventilated
patients( and has the
potential to double the risk of mortality and increase the costs of care and the
duration of hospitalization and mechanical ventilation.( New guidelines and a bundle of simple interventions
are being developed to identify VAP and to reduce its incidence.(One of the factors contributing to the pathogenesis of VAP is believed to be the
rapid colonization of biofilm-forming pathogens, such as Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, on the surface
of endotracheal tubes (ETT).(
These biofilms constitute a protective environment for bacterial colonies, also
possibly contributing to the development of resistance to antibacterial
drugs.(Several antibacterial internal coatings have been proposed to reduce ETT bacterial
colonization, including silver sulfadiazine and chlorhexidine,( antibiotics( and nanoparticle-sized titanium
dioxide (TiO2) alone or with silver.( Photocatalysis was proposed as an additional method to
further increase the antimicrobial activity of coatings,( but it
has not been employed because the catalysts investigated in the first studies
required an ultraviolet (UV) light source at the bedside to activate the
antibacterial effect. Photocatalysis is more effective on gram-negative than
gram-positive bacteria due to differences in cell wall composition.(Recently, modified forms of nanoparticle-sized TiO2 are under
investigation due to their capability of showing photocatalytic antibacterial
activity in the spectrum of visible light,( thus avoiding
the use of potentially harmful UV light and obtaining a bactericidal effect with
conventional fluorescent light illumination,( widely available in hospital environments. TiO2
exhibits its catalytic activity when irradiated with ultraviolet and visible light,
while the action of other catalysts, such as Cu( or Ag( nanoparticles, is mainly
explained by their chemical composition due to the release of metal ions in the
suspension medium. In fact, for metal nanoparticles, it is crucial to control size,
shape, composition, chemical and physical properties during the synthesis process;
therefore, TiO2 was used for its cost-effectiveness( and its easy synthetic process, which appears to be much
easier than the techniques used to synthesize metal nanoparticles, such as
sacrificial anode electrolysis or thermal plasma techniques.The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the efficacy of two forms of
TiO2 as internal coating agents of ETTs segments by examining their
ability to inhibit the growth of two bacteria commonly involved in VAP, S.
aureus and P. aeruginosa, through photocatalysis under
visible light. We hypothesized that N-doping of TiO2 could potentiate the
antibacterial effect, also allowing photocatalysis under visible light, especially
in gram-positive bacteria, where photocatalysis is less efficient.
METHODS
In this study, two different forms of TiO2 nanoparticles were used:
commercially available anatase (Sigma Aldrich, USA) and self-produced N-doped
TiO2 (N-TiO2) crystallized in the anatase structure.
N-TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized using the sol-gel method, as
described in a previous study.(
Briefly, 37.5mL titanium isopropoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) with 70mL of 2-propanol
(Sigma-Aldrich) and 9mL aqueous solution of NH3 (15% V/V) were stirred at
room temperature for 4 hours, then washed with deionized water and dried at 105°C
for 12 hours. The xerogel was finally crushed into a fine powder and calcined at
350°C for 1 hour to complete the crystallization process.Diffuse reflectance spectrophotometry (JASCO V-570 UV-VIS-NIR, Jasco Int. Co. Ltd.,
Japan), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET, ASAP 2000, Micromeritics, US), X-ray powder
diffraction (XRPD, Philips PW 1830 generator, 40 kV, 30 mA) and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM 2010, lanthanum boride crystal operated at 200
kV) were used to characterize the nanoparticles. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (StereoScan 360 microscope, Leica
Cambridge Instruments, United Kingdom) was used to study the nanoparticles and the
samples. EDS analysis was performed on different areas of a representative sample to
estimate the chemical composition corresponding to each observed morphological
pattern.
Preparation of endotracheal tube segments and bacterial inoculation
Titanium dioxide was placed on the internal surface of a 5cm segment of an 8.0mm
polyvinyl chloride commercial ETT (Rüsch, Kernen, Germany) loaded on a
cellulose acetate filter with a 0.45µm pore size (Sartorius Stedim
Biotech, Gottingen, Germany) at a concentration of 0.052mg/cm2 as
previously described.(Bacterial cultures were grown in Luria Bertani broth medium at
37°C, harvested at the exponential growth phase, washed and suspended in 0.9%
sterile sodium chloride solution to a final colony forming unit (CFU) count of
30 ± 5 per milliliter, as verified by optical density at 600nm (Eppendorf
AG, Hamburg, Germany). Five-milliliter aliquots of such bacterial suspension
were filtered through the cellulose acetate filter or the
TiO2-treated cellulose acetate filter to depose the CFUs. The
inoculum size we used had a similar CFU count compared to a previous
study( and has been
shown to be able to initiate biofilm formation in
vitro.(
The filter was later inserted in the ETT segment. A small bacterial inoculum was
chosen to simulate the initial colonization of the tube, subsequently leading to
the formation of biofilm. Sample ETTs were internally coated with
TiO2 or N-TiO2 on cellulose acetate, and controls were
only coated with cellulose acetate.
Photocatalytic activity
Sample and control ETTs were exposed to fluorescent light generated by a
commercial fluorescent light source, a neon tube with 300 - 700nm wavelength
emission spectrum and 3700 lux illuminance (Neon L36W/640, Osram, Münich,
Germany) placed 15cm from the ETT outlet for different exposure times: 5, 10,
20, 40, 60 and 80 minutes. Figure 1
illustrates the experimental setup and the nanoparticle deposition on acetate
filter.
Figure 1
Experimental setting (panel A), tube coating scheme (panel B) and
nanoparticle deposition on acetate filter (panel C).
Experimental setting (panel A), tube coating scheme (panel B) and
nanoparticle deposition on acetate filter (panel C).At the end of each exposure time, acetate filters with bacterial colonies were
removed from the ETT and placed at 37°C on appropriate selective agar media:
MacConkey agar for P. aeruginosa and mannitol-salt agar for
S. aureus. After 24 hours of incubation at 37°C, CFUs were
counted.Blank ETT segments were coated with cellulose acetate without TiO2,
placed in a dark room after bacterial inoculation, and analyzed at the same time
points as the sample and control tubes: they were used as references to
calculate contingent bacterial inactivation not attributable to the
photocatalysis processes.The percentage of inactivation (I) due to the photocatalytic activity was
calculated, as previously described,( as the percent reduction of CFUs in the samples and
control tubes compared to the blank ETTs, with the formula I(%) =
(NB-N)/NB
· 100, where NB is the number of CFUs on the filter
without TiO2 and without light exposure (blank), and N is the number
of CFUs on examined nanoparticle-treated (sample) or untreated (control)
ETTs.
Statistical analysis
The kinetics of bacterial inactivation were calculated from the data of three
independent repeated measurements. Data were compared by two-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test, and statistical significance was
considered at p < 0.05. Data were reported as mean ± standard
deviation or as the percentage of inactivation if not otherwise stated.
Experimental data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science
(SPSS) version 21 (IBM Corp, USA).
RESULTS
TiO nanoparticle characterization
Diffuse reflectance analysis showed wavelength absorption values of 384nm and
413nm for TiO2 and N-TiO2, respectively, thus representing
a shift of the absorption edge towards the visible region for the
N-TiO2. BET analysis revealed specific surface area values of
120m2g-1 and 96.8m2g-1 for
TiO2 and N-TiO2 nanoparticles, respectively. XRPD and
TEM analyses revealed that both the commercial TiO2 and
N-TiO2 crystal structure contained anatase, with a particle size
of 19 ± 2nm and 17 ± 2nm, respectively.
Bacterial inactivation kinetics
In the absence of light, no relevant antibacterial activity was shown against
both strains, with bacterial inactivation after 80 minutes remaining below 3.5%
for both TiO2 and N-TiO2.The inactivation kinetics of the two bacterial strains under fluorescent light
irradiation are illustrated in figure 2. In
EETs exposed to irradiation without TiO2 (controls), bacterial
inhibition ranging from 1% to 18% was found due to the dehydration induced by
irradiation.
Figure 2
Inactivation kinetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (A)
and Staphylococcus aureus (B) under fluorescent
light. * The inactivation of TiO2 and N-TiO2
was significantly higher than that in controls (p < 0.05). ° Only
N-TiO2 was more active than controls (p < 0.05).
† N-TiO2 more active than TiO2 (p <
0.05).
Inactivation kinetics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (A)
and Staphylococcus aureus (B) under fluorescent
light. * The inactivation of TiO2 and N-TiO2
was significantly higher than that in controls (p < 0.05). ° Only
N-TiO2 was more active than controls (p < 0.05).
† N-TiO2 more active than TiO2 (p <
0.05).For P. aeruginosa, all TiO2-coated ETTs showed higher
bacterial inactivation when compared to controls (p < 0.001 at all time
points); no significant difference was found between commercial TiO2
and N-TiO2 (p > 0.20 at all time points).For S. aureus, inactivation was higher than for controls
starting at 5 minutes for N-TiO2 (p = 0.018) and 10 minutes for
TiO2 (p = 0.014). For exposure times longer than 10 minutes, both
coatings were more efficient than controls (p < 0.001 at each time point).
N-TiO2 showed an inactivation higher than that for
TiO2 at 20 minutes (p < 0.001), 40 minutes (p < 0.001) and
60 minutes (p < 0.001) of light exposure.Figure 3 shows representative SEM images of
P. aeruginosa deposed on the internal surface of an ETT
coated with commercial TiO2 before (a) and after (b) 10 minutes of
fluorescent light irradiation. Figure 4
shows a representative sample of N-TiO2-loaded ETT inoculated with
P. aeruginosa after 10 minutes of light exposure with
semi-quantitative EDS spectral analysis.
Figure 3
Scanning electron microscopy images (magnification: x 4000; extra
high tension: 20 kV) of untreated Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells (A)
and treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells (B) upon
fluorescent light illumination in the presence of commercial
TiO2 for 10 minutes.
Figure 4
Scanning electron microscopy images of a representative sample of
endotracheal tubes inoculated with Pseudomonas
aeruginosa after 10 minutes of fluorescent light
irradiation (left panel). P indicates an area where only the
bacterial layer is visible, T represents an area where only
TiO2 is visible, and I represents an intermediate
region. The right panel shows element weight fractions (%) according
to the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy spectra analysis of a
representative sample of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
after 10 minutes of treatment with TiO2 under fluorescent
light irradiation.
Scanning electron microscopy images (magnification: x 4000; extra
high tension: 20 kV) of untreated Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells (A)
and treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells (B) upon
fluorescent light illumination in the presence of commercial
TiO2 for 10 minutes.Scanning electron microscopy images of a representative sample of
endotracheal tubes inoculated with Pseudomonas
aeruginosa after 10 minutes of fluorescent light
irradiation (left panel). P indicates an area where only the
bacterial layer is visible, T represents an area where only
TiO2 is visible, and I represents an intermediate
region. The right panel shows element weight fractions (%) according
to the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy spectra analysis of a
representative sample of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
after 10 minutes of treatment with TiO2 under fluorescent
light irradiation.
DISCUSSION
The main findings of this study are the following: 1) in the absence of light,
neither N-TiO2 nor TiO2 could inhibit bacterial growth within
80 minutes; 2) photocatalysis under fluorescent visible light inhibited bacterial
growth in ETTs; 3) no difference in bacterial inactivation efficacy was observed
between N-TiO2 and TiO2 for P. aeruginosa;
and 4) bacterial inactivation was higher in N-TiO2-coated tubes compared
to TiO2 for S. aureus.This is the first study to investigate a potential clinical application of
N-TiO2. Differently from previous studies, a small CFU count was
deposed in the inoculum, mimicking the initial tube contamination that might occur
in vivo. Absorbance measurements confirmed a shift of the
absorption edge towards the visible region in N-TiO2 compared to
commercial TiO2 due to a decrease of the energy gap of the lattice, which
explains the better efficiency of N-TiO2 found in the present study.
Bacterial inactivation mechanism
Both TiO2 and N-TiO2 were anatase, as previously reported
elsewhere,( and in presence of light
uncoated control showed a minimal inactivation activity, due to
dehydration.( As
illustrated in figure 3, before irradiation
(left panel), the TiO2 was not visible and was entirely covered by a
bacterial mat. After exposure to visible light (right panel), the white areas
corresponding to the underlying TiO2 were visible and surrounded by
bacterial debris as well as intact cells. Upon EDS analysis, the presence of Na
and Cl was mainly due to the solution in which bacteria were suspended (0.9%
NaCl) and appeared homogeneously distributed in the three regions, whereas C and
N were attributable to bacterial cell components (carbohydrates and proteins),
and Ti was the photocatalyst. Oxygen is attributable both to organic components
of the bacterial cell and TiO2. In the EDS spectrum of region P, the
percentage of Ti was low because TiO2 was covered by a bacterial mat,
while the spectrum of region I showed an increase of the photocatalyst signal
probably due to damage to the bacterial cell wall, reflected by a symmetrical
increase in intracellular Na and K content. Finally, the spectrum of region T,
corresponding to an area in which TiO2 was visible, indicates a high
percentage of Ti, Na, K and a low content of C and N.These findings suggest that the direct contact between bacteria and
TiO2 on the filter surface increased the extent of oxidative
damage, enhancing killing of bacteria in a short time according to mechanism
proposed by Foster et al.(
The authors suggested a mechanism involving initial damage in the contact areas
between the cells and TiO2, affecting membrane permeability, followed
by increased damage to all cell wall layers, allowing leakage of small molecules
such as ions. Further membrane damage allows the leakage of higher molecular
weight components, such as proteins. This may be followed by protrusion of the
cytoplasmic membrane into the surrounding medium through degraded areas of the
peptidoglycan and, eventually, lysis of the cell. Degradation of the internal
components of the cell then occurs, followed by complete mineralization.The advantages of N-TiO2 compared to TiO2 in terms of
bacterial inactivation were not explained by different crystalline forms, as
both nanoparticles were made of anatase with comparable sizes. The slight
difference between the BET values indicated that the different performances of
the two nanoparticles might then be explained by the lower value of the energy
gap, which allows major efficiency in the visible photon absorption and in the
photocatalytic antimicrobial activity. It must also be noticed that the presence
of further defects, such as doping atoms, in the TiO2 lattice
enhances electron trapping, which is one of the main mechanisms involved in
photocatalytically activated processes.In the absence of fluorescent light, bacteria impregnated on the internal surface
of endotracheal tubes were insensitive to the two nanoparticle coatings in the
examined time window.In the present study, both TiO2 and N-TiO2 demonstrated the
inactivation of P. aeruginosa growth higher than 77% after 5
minutes of exposure (Figure 2). The
bactericidal activity began within 5 or 10 minutes depending on the strain and
coating and increased with a longer irradiation time. The photocatalytic
inactivation appears to be similar to that obtained in a previous study on
Escherichia coli.(In ETTs inoculated with S. aureus, bacterial inactivation rates
comparable to those obtained for P. aeruginosa were achieved
after 40 minutes and 60 minutes in samples treated with N-TiO2 and
TiO2, respectively. As shown in figure 2, after 5 minutes of light exposure, there were no
significant differences between TiO2 and control ETTs. After 20, 40
and 60 min, N-TiO2 was more active than TiO2, and for
longer exposure times (80 min), the photocatalytic inactivation reached a
plateau at nearly 100% (99 ± 1)%. Previous studies evaluated commercial
TiO2 without light exposure supplementation and found a lack of
activity against S. aureus.(The kinetics of the photocatalytic inactivation of P. aeruginosa
were equal for TiO2 and N-TiO2 and faster than those of
S. aureus, in accordance with data found by other authors
who observed that gram-positive bacteria are more resistant to photocatalysis
than gram-negative bacteria.(
Clinical implications
According to our findings, fluorescent light irradiation may be sufficient to
trigger the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 and N-TiO2
without the need for an ultraviolet light source. N-TiO2 shows a
higher and faster bacterial inactivation than TiO2 when tested
against S. aureus. Our results suggest that photocatalysis
under fluorescent visible light, especially with N-TiO2, could have
clinical applications.These results showed that nanosized N-TiO2 can effectively prevent the
growth of a small bacterial inoculum when exposed to conventional fluorescent
light: this finding could have several practical applications.
Nanoparticles-coated materials could be used to prevent or reduce bacterial
colonization of medical devices as well as furniture and working surfaces,
especially in environments like the ICU, where the high prevalence of
multi-resistant strains of bacteria requires non-pharmaceutical measures to
control the spread of infection.It is therefore important to optimize the chemical, physical and morphological
properties of this material to further improve disinfection under visible light
and study the activity of other microorganisms. In this bench-top study,
nanoparticles were loaded in the ETT deposed on an acetate filter. For clinical
applications, the development of a method to depose the nanoparticles on the
polymeric matrix of the tube is necessary.
Limitations of the study
A major limitation of this study was that a single light source was tested: we
are therefore unable to estimate a threshold of light irradiation necessary to
initiate the photocatalytic process. Since ETTs are placed deeply inside the
trachea, further studies should investigate whether ambient light transmission
through the tube wall is sufficient to activate photocatalysis or whether an
especially designed light source should be placed nearby to allow the
antimicrobial activity. In the latter case, the fact that N-TiO2 is
more effectively activated by fluorescent light without the need for a UV source
would increase the clinical feasibility of such an approach. The efficacy of the
coating was not tested against an active comparator, such as an
antibiotic-loaded coating. However, the emergence of multi-drug resistant
strains of bacteria in the ICU encourages research in infection control
strategies not implying the use of antibiotics. Moreover, further studies are
warranted to investigate the antibacterial activity of N-TiO2 against
other bacterial strains and its applicability in vivo.
CONCLUSIONS
The photocatalytic inactivation of P. aeruginosa and S.
aureus by commercial TiO2 and synthesized N-TiO2
was analyzed. Nanosized commercial TiO2 and N-TiO2 inhibit
bacterial growth under visible fluorescent light. N-TiO2 has higher
antibacterial activity against S. aureus compared to
TiO2. The results of this study show that photocatalysis with the N-TiO method was an effective tool for bacteria inactivation. According to our
findings, natural light irradiation or room light could be sufficient for
N-TiO2 activation, so this disinfection method could be constantly
operating.
Authors' contributions
V Caratto and L Ball equally contributed to this manuscript. V Caratto, L Ball
and E Sanguineti designed the study, collected the data, and wrote and revised
the manuscript. M Ferretti and P Pelosi designed the study, interpreted the
results and wrote and revised the manuscript. I Firpo and S Alberti collected
the data and revised the manuscript. L Ball and A Insorsi performed data
analysis and revised the manuscript. All the authors revised the final version
of the manuscript.
Authors: J Barros; L Grenho; C M Manuel; C Ferreira; L Melo; O C Nunes; F J Monteiro; M P Ferraz Journal: J Biomater Appl Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Keiko M Tarquinio; Nikhil K Kothurkar; Dharendra Y Goswami; Ronald C Sanders; Arno L Zaritsky; Ann Marie LeVine Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2010-04-07
Authors: Lorenzo Berra; Theodor Kolobow; Patrice Laquerriere; Betsey Pitts; Simone Bramati; Joshua Pohlmann; Chiara Marelli; Miriam Panzeri; Pietro Brambillasca; Federico Villa; Andrea Baccarelli; Sylvie Bouthors; Henry T Stelfox; Luca M Bigatello; Joel Moss; Antonio Pesenti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Michael Klompas; Deverick Anderson; William Trick; Hilary Babcock; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Lingling Li; Ronda Sinkowitz-Cochran; E Wesley Ely; John Jernigan; Shelley Magill; Rosie Lyles; Caroline O'Neil; Barrett T Kitch; Ellen Arrington; Michele C Balas; Ken Kleinman; Christina Bruce; Julie Lankiewicz; Michael V Murphy; Christopher E Cox; Ebbing Lautenbach; Daniel Sexton; Victoria Fraser; Robert A Weinstein; Richard Platt Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Katariina Koskinen; Reetta Penttinen; Anni-Maria Örmälä-Odegrip; Christian G Giske; Tarmo Ketola; Matti Jalasvuori Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 5.293