| Literature DB >> 28443982 |
William Cevallos1,2, Manuel Calvopiña3, Victoria Nipáz1, Belén Vicente-Santiago2, Julio López-Albán2, Pedro Fernández-Soto2, Ángel Guevara1, Antonio Muro2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amphimerus spp. is a liver fluke that infects humans and domestic animals. It is highly prevalent in some Ecuadorian communities. Currently, diagnosis is based on the microscopic observation of eggs in faeces, but this has variable sensitivity. More sensitive methods are needed for diagnostic testing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28443982 PMCID: PMC5398163 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Fig. 1: values of optical density determined for the Amphimerus spp. crude antigen determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using sera from patients. We included sera from patients diagnosed with amphimeriasis based upon the detection of eggs (group 1), sera from healthy people living in amphimeriasis-affected areas (group 2), sera from healthy people living in areas unaffected by amphimeriasis (group 3), and sera from patients suffering from unrelated helminthic, protozoan, or viral infections (group 4). The horizontal line represents the mean values. The asterisk represents significant differences in the mean between group 1 and the other groups.
Fig. 2: the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. The ROC curve was generated using data from 48 sera samples from people infected with Amphimerus spp. and 60 sera samples from healthy people residing in non-endemic areas. The area under the curve (accuracy) for the serologic index (SI) was 0.970. For the optical density (OD) was 0.962.
Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values [cut-off 18%, 95% confidence interval (CI)] for serum samples from people diagnosed with Amphimerus spp. infection. The infection was confirmed by detection of Amphimerus eggs in stool samples (infected). Serum samples from people living in endemic areas who were negative for the presence of Amphimerus eggs in stool and serum samples from people suffering from other parasitic or non-parasitic infections (uninfected) were also examined
| ELISA result | Infected | n | Uninfected | n | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | TP | 41 | FP | 48 | 89 |
| Negative | FN | 7 | TN | 123* | 130 |
|
| |||||
| Total | 48 | 171 | 219 | ||
Sensitivity: = 85.0% (95% CI: 80.3 - 89.7%), it was calculated as TP/(TP+FN); specificity: = 71.0% (95% CI: 65.2 - 76.8%), it was calculated as TN/(TN+FP); positive predictive value = 46.0% (95% CI: 39.4 - 52.6%), it was calculated as TP/(TP+FP); negative predictive value = 86.5 (95% CI: 84.2% to 88.8%), it was calculated as TN/(TN+FN); ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FN: false negative; FP: false positive; TN: true negative; TP: true positive; *: for this value we eliminated 78 healthy people from endemic amphimeriasis area.