Literature DB >> 28443913

The effect of surface roughness and viscoelasticity on rubber adhesion.

A Tiwari1, L Dorogin2, A I Bennett3, K D Schulze3, W G Sawyer3, M Tahir4, G Heinrich4, B N J Persson5.   

Abstract

Adhesion between silica glass or acrylic balls and silicone elastomers and various industrial rubbers is investigated. The work of adhesion during pull-off is found to strongly vary depending on the system, which we attribute to the two opposite effects: (1) viscoelastic energy dissipation close to an opening crack tip and (2) surface roughness. Introducing surface roughness on the glass ball is found to increase the work of adhesion for soft elastomers, while for the stiffer elastomers it results in a strong reduction in the work of adhesion. For the soft silicone elastomers a strong increase in the work of adhesion with increasing pull-off velocity is observed, which may result from the non-adiabatic processes associated with molecular chain pull-out. In general, the work of adhesion is decreased after repeated contacts due to the transfer of molecules from the elastomers to the glass ball. Thus, extracting the free chains (oligomers) from the silicone elastomers is shown to make the work of adhesion independent of the number of contacts. The viscoelastic properties (linear and nonlinear) of all of the rubber compounds are measured, and the velocity dependent crack opening propagation energy at the interface is calculated. Silicone elastomers show a good agreement between the measured work of adhesion and the predicted results, but carbon black filled hydrogenated nitrile butadiene rubber compounds reveal that strain softening at the crack tip may play an important role in determining the work of adhesion. Additionally, adhesion measurement under submerged conditions in distilled water and water + soap solutions are also performed: a strong reduction in the work of adhesion is measured for the silicone elastomers submerged in water, and a complete elimination of adhesion is found for the water + soap solution attributed to an osmotic repulsion between the negatively charged surface of the glass and the elastomer.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28443913     DOI: 10.1039/c7sm00177k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Matter        ISSN: 1744-683X            Impact factor:   3.679


  4 in total

1.  Linking energy loss in soft adhesion to surface roughness.

Authors:  Siddhesh Dalvi; Abhijeet Gujrati; Subarna R Khanal; Lars Pastewka; Ali Dhinojwala; Tevis D B Jacobs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Role of fingerprint-inspired relief structures in elastomeric slabs for detecting frictional differences arising from surface monolayers.

Authors:  Charles Dhong; Laure V Kayser; Ryan Arroyo; Andrew Shin; Mickey Finn; Andrew T Kleinschmidt; Darren J Lipomi
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.679

3.  Modulation of Interfacial Adhesion Using Semicrystalline Shape-Memory Polymers.

Authors:  Soyoun Kim; Sanjay Lakshmanan; Jinhai Li; Mitchell Anthamatten; John Lambropoulos; Alexander A Shestopalov
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  Rapid and continuous regulating adhesion strength by mechanical micro-vibration.

Authors:  Langquan Shui; Laibing Jia; Hangbo Li; Jiaojiao Guo; Ziyu Guo; Yilun Liu; Ze Liu; Xi Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.