Literature DB >> 28443487

Objectively measured physical activity and 12-month trajectories of neck-shoulder pain in workers: A prospective study in DPHACTO.

David M Hallman1, Marie Birk Jørgensen2, Andreas Holtermann2,3.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the association between objectively measured physical activity at work and leisure and the intensity (mean level and time course) of neck-shoulder pain (NSP) over 12 months among male and female blue collar workers.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 625 blue collar workers from the Danish cohort DPHACTO. Physical activity was measured objectively at baseline using accelerometers. The percentage of time spent in physical activity (walking, climbing stairs, running and cycling) was calculated for both work and leisure time. Longitudinal data on the intensity of NSP (numerical rating scale 0-10) were collected using text messages every fourth week over 12 months. Linear mixed models were used to investigate the associations between occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) and the trajectories of the intensity of NSP, adjusted for individual, biomechanical and psychosocial factors, and baseline pain.
RESULTS: OPA was not associated with the mean intensity of NSP over 12 months. LTPA was negatively associated with the mean intensity of NSP both among men ( B=-0.71, 95% CI -1.31 to -0.11) and women ( B=-0.85, 95% CI -1.57 to -0.13). Sex interactions on the 12-month trajectories of NSP showed that higher physical activity was associated with a slower reduction in NSP among men for OPA only ( B=0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.05) and women for LTPA only ( B=0.05, 95% CI 0.00-0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that more time in LTPA was associated with a lower overall intensity of NSP over 12 months among blue collar workers. However, depending on sex and domain, high physical activity had an unfavourable effect on the course of NSP over 12 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerometer; leisure time physical activity; longitudinal study; neck pain; occupational health; occupational physical activity; work exposure

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28443487     DOI: 10.1177/1403494816688376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  14 in total

Review 1.  Wearable Devices: Current Status and Opportunities in Pain Assessment and Management.

Authors:  Andrew Leroux; Rachael Rzasa-Lynn; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Tushar Sharma
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-19

2.  Barriers to the Adoption of Wearable Sensors in the Workplace: A Survey of Occupational Safety and Health Professionals.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Richard F Sesek; Lora A Cavuoto
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie A Prince; Cara G Elliott; Kyle Scott; Sarah Visintini; Jennifer L Reed
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Sick leave due to musculoskeletal pain: determinants of distinct trajectories over 1 year.

Authors:  David M Hallman; Andreas Holtermann; Martin Björklund; Nidhi Gupta; Charlotte D Nørregaard Rasmussen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 5.  Sensor Technologies to Manage the Physiological Traits of Chronic Pain: A Review.

Authors:  David Naranjo-Hernández; Javier Reina-Tosina; Laura M Roa
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Objectively measured versus self-reported occupational physical activity and multisite musculoskeletal pain: a prospective follow-up study at 20 nursing homes in Denmark.

Authors:  Subas Neupane; Kristina Karstad; David M Hallman; Reiner Rugulies; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Thigh-worn accelerometry for measuring movement and posture across the 24-hour cycle: a scoping review and expert statement.

Authors:  Matthew L Stevens; Nidhi Gupta; Elif Inan Eroglu; Patrick Joseph Crowley; Barbaros Eroglu; Adrian Bauman; Malcolm Granat; Leon Straker; Peter Palm; Sari Stenholm; Mette Aadahl; Paul Mork; Sebastien Chastin; Vegar Rangul; Mark Hamer; Annemarie Koster; Andreas Holtermann; Emmanuel Stamatakis
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-12-24

Review 8.  The Ergonomic Association between Shoulder, Neck/Head Disorders and Sedentary Activity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rama Krishna Reddy Guduru; Aurelijus Domeika; Linas Obcarskas; Berta Ylaite
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Self-recordings of upper arm elevation during cleaning - comparison between analyses using a simplified reference posture and a standard reference posture.

Authors:  Camilla Dahlqvist; Catarina Nordander; Mikael Forsman; Henrik Enquist
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Use of accelerometer-based activity monitoring in orthopaedics: benefits, impact and practical considerations.

Authors:  Maik Sliepen; Matthijs Lipperts; Marianne Tjur; Inger Mechlenburg
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2020-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.