Literature DB >> 28443253

Bone modeling, remodeling, and skeletal health in children and adolescents: mineral accrual, assessment and treatment.

Chiara Maggioli1, Stefano Stagi1.   

Abstract

The modeling and remodeling process of the bone is fundamental to maintaining its integrity and mechanical properties. Many physical and biochemical factors during childhood and adolescence are crucially important for the development of healthy bones. Systemic conditions, such as hormonal status, nutrition, physical inactivity, or many pharmacological treatments, as well as a local variation in the load, can influence bone turnover and, consequently, the attainment of a proper peak bone mass. However, many diseases affecting children and adolescents can be associated with a reduction in bone accrual or a loss of bone mass and quality, which leads to an increased risk of fracture over one's life. In this review, we examine the effects of genetics, physical activity, chronic diseases and pharmacological treatments, and dietary factors on bone integrity in children and adolescents. We also briefly describe the specific tools that are currently used in assessing bone health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Bone density; Bone health; Child

Year:  2017        PMID: 28443253      PMCID: PMC5401817          DOI: 10.6065/apem.2017.22.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 2287-1012


Introduction

Osteoporosis in adults is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality because of its association with fragility fractures1). The peak bone mass (PBM) is well known as a key determinant of the lifetime risk of osteoporosis. In fact, childhood and adolescence are a critical time for bone development, mineralization, and the attainment of a PBM2). Therefore, osteoporosis prevention begins by optimizing bone mineral gains over an individual's growing years3). During childhood and adolescence, bone linear growth and bone mineral accrual proceed in different ways and velocities in various skeletal sites2). In particular, the growth of the appendicular skeleton is prevalent before puberty, whereas that of the spine mostly occurs later. During peripuberty, the areal bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine and proximal femur increase fourfold to sixfold. At the same time, the diaphyses of the long bone increase twofold4). Puberty is also the time of major gender differences in bone growth, particularly in terms of bone size and bone mass content. The bone mass accrual rate usually follows sex-specific patterns that are similar to those of height velocity but are delayed by about 6–12 months (Fig. 1). Therefore, the peripubertal period is characterized by relatively undermineralized bones and a higher risk of fractures until the PBM is achieved. In fact, the increase in bone mass and density carries on for several years after the end of linear growth. The exact time when bone accrual ceases is unknown, but it is estimated to be during the young adult age. In particular, it is specific for different sites: it ranges from 16 to 18 years for the spine and femoral neck, and up to 35 years for the skull4).
Fig. 1

(A) Growth of bone mass in relation to height growth velocity and difference in peak bone mass between males (♂) and females (♀). (B) Difference in peak bone mass between males (♂) and females (♀) and factors and diseases that influence the peak bone mass and the risk of osteopenia/osteoporosis in adulthood.

Among many factors that drive skeletal growth, the genetic factor plays a key role in the variability of PBM5). Genome-wide association studies have discovered numerous genes involved in this process. Polymorphisms in the genes encoding the vitamin D receptor, estrogen receptor, insulin-like growth factor-I, type I collagen, transforming growth factor beta, and interleukin 6 are the most intensively studied, but recently, some genes that also seem to influence BMD in children and osteoporosis in adults have been recognized. Aside from heritable factors, environmental factors, such as diet, physical activity6), and hormonal status, modify the complex mechanism of cellular interactions leading to bone accrual. Multiple hormonal signals regulate bone growth and turnover. In addition to the well-known parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcitonin, thyroid hormones, the growth hormone, and sexual steroids, other hormones, cytokines, and growth factors with endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine actions have been the focus in an increasing number of studies. Bone cells and the skeletal matrix itself produce and contain many signals that influence bone growth; furthermore, neighboring muscle and adipose tissue exert significant 2-way interactions, with the skeleton contributing significantly to the final adult bone density7). Particularly, as shown by recent studies, a higher muscle mass and greater brown adipose tissue volume are associated with a greater cortical bone density and thickness8).

Definition

Osteoporosis in childhood and adolescence is a condition characterized by a low BMD or BMC (z-score ≤-2.0, adjusted for age and gender) and the presence of a clinically significant fracture history9).

Causes

Pediatric osteoporosis recognizes 2 pathogenetic pathways that can contribute to the development of this condition—defects in bone accrual and mineralization, and excessive bone resorption. The causes of osteoporosis are included into 2 large groups, which identify primary and secondary osteoporosis. Primary osteoporosis is a rare disease that is mainly related to genetic defects leading to an intrinsic bone abnormality10). Osteogenesis imperfecta, through its various clinical phenotypes, is the most common genetic disease. Fractures, blue sclera, a short stature, joint laxity, and hearing loss are typical features of osteogenesis imperfecta. Other genetic defects include some rickets, calcium and phosphorus metabolism alterations, and genetic syndromes, such as Marfan syndrome, Paget disease, and Ehler-Danlos syndrome (Table 1). Secondary osteoporosis in childhood is more frequent than primary osteoporosis (Table 2). Systemic chronic inflammatory diseases, malabsorption disorders, endocrinopathies, neoplastic diseases, and medications are the most common causes of secondary osteoporosis. Furthermore, prolonged immobilization can lead to a decrease in BMD, determining the reduction of mechanical stress on the bone. Among medications, many drugs can interfere with calcium and vitamin D absorption and metabolism, or adversely work directly on bone metabolism. Glucocorticoid-associated osteoporosis (GAO) is an iatrogenic condition that leads to an impaired BMD. Glucocorticoids work both on calcium metabolism and directly on bone cells. Particularly, calcium gastrointestinal absorption is impaired, and urinary excretion is increased. The effect on bone cells is characterized by a transient early phase of increased bone resorption through stimulation of osteoclasts. Conversely, in the long term, the major determinant of damage is impaired bone formation. Osteoblastogenesis is reduced, and apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes is increased11). The osteoblastic function to stimulate the synthesis of type 1 collagen is also impaired. Moreover, glucocorticoid can alter bone metabolism through extra skeletal actions. Altered growth hormone synthesis and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function are frequently involved in GAO. Because of accelerated muscle catabolism, glucocorticoid myopathy can have a role in bone damage. Furthermore, glucocorticoids can worsen bone damage, induced by an underlying inflammatory disease, and result in an increased risk of fractures. Prolonged inflammation indeed alters bone metabolism, which favors bone resorption in different ways. Interleukin 1 and interleukin 6 stimulate osteoclastogenesis through receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand; therefore, collagen synthesis and osteoblast differentiation are impaired, and osteoblast apoptosis is increased1213).
Table 1

Causes of primacy osteoporosis in children and adolescents

DiseaseGene
Osteogenesis imperfectaCOL1A1; COL1A2; IFITM5; SERPINF1; CRTAP; LEPRE1; PPIB; FKBP10; BMP1; SP7; SERPINH1; WNT1; TMEM38B; SPARC
X-linked hypophoshatemic ricketsPHEX; CLCN5
HomocystinuriaCBS; MTHFR
HypophosphatasiaALPL
Wilson diseaseATP7B
Menkes’ kinky hair syndromeATP7A
Osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndromeLRP5
Idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis-
Juvenile Paget diseaseOPG
Early-onset Paget diseaseRANK
Ehlers-Danlos syndromeCOL5A2; COL5A1; COL1A1; COL3A1; PLOD1; COL1A2; ADAMTS2; COL3A1; TNXB
Bruck syndromeFKBP10; PLOD2
Marfan syndromeFBN1
Hypophosphatemic nephrolithiasis/osteoporosisSLC34A1; NPHLOP2
Hajdu-Cheney syndromeNOTCH2
Torg-Winchester syndromeMMP2
Shwachman-Diamond syndromeSBDS
Singleton-Merten syndromeIFIH1; DDX58
Schwartz-Jampel SyndromeHSPG2
Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 1ERCC6
Cleidocranial dysostosisRUNX2
Stuve-Wiedemann syndromeLIFR
Cole-Carpenter syndromeP4HB; SEC24D
Geroderma osteodysplasticumGORAB
Noonan syndromePTPN11; SHOC2; KRAS; SOS1; RAF1; NRAS; BRAF; RIT1
Neonatal hyperparathyroidismCASR
Other forms of hypophosphatemic ricketsSLC34A3; FGF23; DMP1; ENPP1
Hypocalcemic ricketsVDR; CYP2R1; CYP27B1
Turner syndrome-
Klinefelter syndrome-
Down syndrome-
Williams-Beuren syndrome-

This table lists only the most frequent diseases associated with primary osteoporosis according to the recent literature.

Modified from Stagi S, et al. Ital J Pediatr 2014;40:55.10)

Table 2

Main conditions potentially causing an altered bone density and/or quality in childhood

ClassificationDisease
Endocrine diseasesHypogonadism; insensitivity syndrome of estrogen; panhypopituitarism; growth hormone deficiency; hyperthyroidism; Cushing syndrome; primary hyperparathyroidism; primary hypoparathyroidism; McCune-Albright syndrome
Iatrogenic causesAnticonvulsants; gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue; L-thyroxine (high dose); antiretroviral drugs; anticoagulants; chemotherapeutic drugs; corticosteroids treatments
Genetic syndromesTurner syndrome; Klinefelter syndrome; 22q11 deletion syndrome; Down syndrome; Williams-Beuren syndrome
MalignanciesLeukemia; lymphoma; solid tumors
Nutritional problemsNervous anorexia; lactose intolerance; deficiency of calcium, copper, etc.; vegetarian diets; malnutrition; total parenteral nutrition
Chronic diseasesJuvenile idiopathic arthritis; systemic lupus erythematosus; dermatomyositis; chronic renal failure; renal tubular acidosis; idiopathic hypercalciuria; cholestatic forms; celiac disease; Crohn disease; ulcerative Colitis; congestive heart failure; thalassemia; hereditary hemochromatosis; haemophilia; sickle cell anemia; systemic mastocytosis; hyper-IgE syndrome; overweight/obesity
OtherImmobilization/little use; intense physical activity; posttransplant; prematurity
Malabsorption and celiac disease are the most common causes of bone damage. A low BMD and impaired bone growth in childhood are caused by reduced calcium and vitamin D absorption, as well as secondary hyperparathyroidism. In these patients, a strictly gluten-free diet significantly improves bone mineralization14). Many endocrinopathies affect bone health. Alterations in PTH metabolism, as well as thyroid hormones, the growth hormone, cortisol, and sex steroids, influence bone growth and accrual. Furthermore, type 1 diabetes impairs the attainment of the PBM, which increases the long-life risk of fractures1516). The main mechanism underlying this association is a defect in osteoblast differentiation and activity because of many contributing factors, such as insulinopenia and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Moreover, other mechanisms involved include hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and the accumulation of advanced glycation end products that compromise collagen properties17).

Diagnosis

A diagnosis of bone disease requires clinical assessment, laboratory, and imaging. Some conditions, such as primary osteoporosis, also need genetic investigation and bone biopsy. In this section, I describe the specific tools that are currently used in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a widely available technique that is used to investigate BMC and BMD918). In association with a history of fractures, BMD evaluation is required to make a diagnosis of osteoporosis in children and adolescents. However, in pediatric patients, the correct reading of DXA is affected by several limitations. The T-score parameter is not applicable to children because it refers to the BMD value upon PBM achievement. The z-score is the index used in childhood and adolescence up to 20 years. It is adjusted for age, gender, and ethnic group, but it does not consider weight and height variability19). Therefore, in children with a short stature or delayed puberty, their BMD is underestimated. In fact, these patients have smaller bones compared with their peers. Unlike the T-score, the z-score without a fracture history cannot be used to characterize “osteoporosis,” whereas the term “reduced bone density according to chronological age” should be used if the z-score is below -2.0 standard deviation, according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry20). Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is an excellent alternative to DXA because it can evaluate cortical and trabecular compartments, as well as volumetric bone density. High-resolution QCT also assesses the microarchitecture of the bone and is useful in evaluating bone strength. However, the use of QCT is limited by its high cost and higher radiation than that of DXA21). Quantitative bone ultrasonometry (QUS) is a radiation-free approach to investigate bone mineral status in childhood. This method is fast to execute and cheap. Through measurements of the speed of sound, broadband ultrasound attenuation, stiffness factor, and bone transmission time, QUS can give information on not only density but also elasticity, microarchitecture, and thickness2223). However, at present, no evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of QUS in the pediatric population is available, although several studies have demonstrated its correlation with densitometric parameters. Therefore, in consideration of its characteristics, QUS cannot replace DXA, but it can be integrated to it.

Therapeutical approaches

The first approach to pediatric osteoporosis is prevention, if possible. This approach consists of identifying those patients at risk of bone disease and counseling them about lifestyle and dietary calcium and vitamin D supplementations. Several studies suggest that physical activity in childhood is an effective strategy to achieve the optimal PBM24). Secondary osteoporosis is treated by removing the underlying specific cause. The drugs approved for pediatric use in osteoporosis are limited. When the main mechanism of osteoporosis is bone resorption, treatment with an antiresorptive agent is the appropriate choice. Several studies demonstrated bisphosphonate utility in severe osteoporosis and in primary prevention in some conditions as glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, although this practice is not yet recommended25). Therefore, bisphosphonates are used in some genetic forms, such as osteogenesis imperfecta. The recombinant human parathyroid hormone, an anabolic agent that is effective in adults, is unavailable for children because of the risk of osteosarcoma. Indeed, this association with osteosarcoma is well demonstrated in rats in many studies, but it remains theoretical for humans26).

Conclusions

Osteoporosis in childhood and adolescence is characterized by reduced bone density (z-score≤2) associated with fragility fractures. This condition during an individual's growth years can alter bone mineral accrual, which leads to insufficient bone peak mass. It is a well-recognized risk factor for adult bone fragility. Primary osteoporosis is caused by genetic defects that lead to bone abnormality, whereas secondary osteoporosis results from multisystemic, often chronic, diseases, or their treatments. Prevention consists of a healthy lifestyle, physical activity, and optimal calcium and vitamin D intake. Therapy depends on the pathogenesis involved; in severe osteoporosis, bisphosphonates are recommended.
  25 in total

Review 1.  Acquisition of optimal bone mass in childhood and adolescence.

Authors:  L K Bachrach
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 12.015

2.  The Determinants of Peak Bone Mass.

Authors:  Catherine M Gordon; Babette S Zemel; Tishya A L Wren; Mary B Leonard; Laura K Bachrach; Frank Rauch; Vicente Gilsanz; Clifford J Rosen; Karen K Winer
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Challenges in studying very rare cancer outcomes and infrequent exposures: example of teriparatide and osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Andrews; Alicia Gilsenan; Kirk Midkiff; David Harris
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Halley Wasserman; Jennifer M O'Donnell; Catherine M Gordon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Genetics of pediatric bone strength.

Authors:  Jonathan A Mitchell; Diana L Cousminer; Babette S Zemel; Struan F A Grant; Alessandra Chesi
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-07-20

Review 6.  CLINICAL Review #: the role of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK)/RANK ligand/osteoprotegerin: clinical implications.

Authors:  Damaris Vega; Naim M Maalouf; Khashayar Sakhaee
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Skeletal involvement in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Vincenzo Carnevale; Elisabetta Romagnoli; Emilio D'Erasmo
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.876

Review 8.  Prenatal and childhood influences on osteoporosis.

Authors:  M K Javaid; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.690

Review 9.  Type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis: from molecular pathways to bone phenotype.

Authors:  Tayyab S Khan; Lisa-Ann Fraser
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2015-03-22

10.  Is calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation a valid index of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mass in children?

Authors:  B K Weeks; R Hirsch; R C Nogueira; B R Beck
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.853

View more
  10 in total

1.  Tracking of bone mass from childhood to puberty: a 7-year follow-up. The CHAMPS study DK.

Authors:  M S Rønne; M Heidemann; A Schou; J O Laursen; A B Bojesen; L Lylloff; S Husby; N Wedderkopp; C Mølgaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Physical Fitness and Bone Health in Young Athletes and Nonathletes.

Authors:  Duarte Henriques-Neto; João P Magalhães; Megan Hetherington-Rauth; Diana A Santos; Fátima Baptista; Luís B Sardinha
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  The Role of Overweight and Obesity on Bone Health in Korean Adolescents with a Focus on Lean and Fat Mass.

Authors:  Hwa Young Kim; Hae Woon Jung; Hyunsook Hong; Jae Hyun Kim; Choong Ho Shin; Sei Won Yang; Young Ah Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Spirulina Enhances Bone Modeling in Growing Male Rats by Regulating Growth-Related Hormones.

Authors:  Jin Ah Cho; Seong Yeon Baek; Sun Hee Cheong; Mee Ree Kim
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  An mTOR Signaling Modulator Suppressed Heterotopic Ossification of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva.

Authors:  Kyosuke Hino; Chengzhu Zhao; Kazuhiko Horigome; Megumi Nishio; Yasue Okanishi; Sanae Nagata; Shingo Komura; Yasuhiro Yamada; Junya Toguchida; Akira Ohta; Makoto Ikeya
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.765

6.  Bone Health and Its Relationship with Impact Loading and the Continuity of Physical Activity throughout School Periods.

Authors:  Gotzone Hervás; Fatima Ruiz-Litago; Jon Irazusta; Amaia Irazusta; Begoña Sanz; Javier Gil-Goikouria; Ana Belen Fraile-Bermudez; Carmen Pérez-Rodrigo; Idoia Zarrazquin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Nutritional factors associated with femoral neck bone mineral density in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Guo-Hau Gou; Feng-Jen Tseng; Sheng-Hao Wang; Pao-Ju Chen; Jia-Fwu Shyu; Ru-Yu Pan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Belly fat or bloating? New insights into the physical appearance of St Anthony of Padua.

Authors:  Jessica Mongillo; Giulia Vescovo; Barbara Bramanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bone quality in fluoride-exposed populations: A novel application of the ultrasonic method.

Authors:  Tewodros Rango Godebo; Marc Jeuland; Redda Tekle-Haimanot; Arti Shankar; Biniyam Alemayehu; Getachew Assefa; Gary Whitford; Amy Wolfe
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2019-12-07

10.  β-Hydroxy-β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) Supplementation Prevents Bone Loss during Pregnancy-Novel Evidence from a Spiny Mouse (Acomys cahirinus) Model.

Authors:  Ewa Tomaszewska; Janine Donaldson; Jakub Kosiński; Piotr Dobrowolski; Agnieszka Tomczyk-Warunek; Monika Hułas-Stasiak; Krzysztof Lamorski; Dorota Laskowska-Woźniak; Siemowit Muszyński; Rudolf Blicharski; Tomasz Blicharski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.