Literature DB >> 28443211

Evaluation of common variants in MG53 and the risk of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance in Han Chinese.

Song Yang1, Hailong Zhao2, Kuangfeng Xu3, Yun Qian4, Ming Wu5, Tao Yang3, Yanchun Chen1, Xianghai Zhao1, Jinfeng Chen6, Jinbo Wen2, Zhibing Hu2, Harvest F Gu7, Hongbing Shen2, Chong Shen2,6.   

Abstract

Abnormally increased skeletal-muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase (MG53) is associated with the inhibition of insulin signalling and insulin resistance (IR) in animal models. Four community-based studies of Han Chinese populations were included in this study to test the association of variants of MG53 and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The results showed that rs7186832 and rs12929077 in MG53 were significantly associated with T2D and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) of females in the discovery-stage case-control study and cohort study respectively of rural population but not in the replication sample of urban population. In rural population, the fasting insulin (mU/L) of the subjects with AA, AG and GG genotypes in rs12929077 were 8.70 ± 8.05, 10.71 ± 11.16 and 13.41 ± 14.26, respectively, and increased linearly in T2D cases without medication treatment (P = 0.04). This variant was significantly associated with HOMA-IR (P = 0.020) and HOMA-IS (P = 0.023). In individuals with IFG, the insulin and HOMA-IR of AG carriers were significantly higher than those of AA carriers. In urban population, after glucose loading, there were significant differences in the 30-min glucose, the area under the curve (AUC) of 30-min glucose and the AUC of 120-min glucose according to the genotypes of rs7186832 and rs12929077 in males but not females. Our findings suggest that MG53 variants might confer risk susceptibility to the development of T2D of females and IR particularly in rural population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic association; Insulin resistance; Insulin sensitivity; MG53; Type 2 diabetes

Year:  2016        PMID: 28443211      PMCID: PMC5395513          DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2218-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Springerplus        ISSN: 2193-1801


Background

Diabetes affects approximately 10 % of the world’s adult population and is one of the leading risk factors for cardiovascular disease, renal failure and visual impairment (Shaw et al. 2010; van Dieren et al. 2010). Of all of the categories of diabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) accounts for approximately 90 %. In recent decades, the prevalence of T2D has increased rapidly due to ageing of the population, urbanization and lifestyle changes, making it one of the most important public health challenges in China (Xu et al. 2008; Wong and Wang 2006). Although the increase in T2D prevalence is caused by environmental factors, there is considerable evidence that T2D is highly heritable (Pyke 1979; Sandler 1984; Jirkovska 1989). Genome-wide association studies have identified a number of susceptibility loci associated with T2D (Tsai et al. 2010; Sladek et al. 2007; Scott et al. 2007). However, these loci account for only some of the genetic variants in T2D, suggesting that much remains to be discovered. Further research should reveal additional genetic factors based on the understanding of the mechanisms that are involved in the development of T2D. Insulin resistance (IR), defined as decreased glucose uptake and disposal ability, along with defects in insulin secretion, are fundamental elements in the aetiology of T2D. In the early stage of the disease, IR is highest in skeletal muscle (Kahn 1994), which accounts for approximately two-thirds of glucose utilization after meals. Several studies have demonstrated that insulin receptor, insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) and kinase activities are decrease in the muscles of early-T2D patients (Goodyear et al. 1995; Caro et al. 1987), suggesting that insulin receptor and IRS1 play important roles in the insulin signalling pathway (Hepp 1980). Further studies have shown that insulin binds insulin receptor and then activates IRS protein tyrosine phosphorylation immediately after initiating insulin’s downstream effects, including the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and the translocation of glucose transporter 4 (Frattali et al. 1991; Murakami and Rosen 1991; Ma et al. 2013). In contrast to the glucose tolerance change observed in IRS1 tissue-specific knockout mice (Bruning et al. 1998), animals with muscle-specific insulin receptor knockout exhibited features of T2D without a change in glucose tolerance. Therefore, IR in skeletal muscle may be a key player in the development of T2D, but the mechanisms that are involved in skeletal muscle IR remain uncertain. Recently, a report published in Nature has proposed a new mechanism underlying IR in skeletal muscle and metabolic syndrome, identifying a novel role of Mitsugumin 53 (MG53) as a muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase targeting insulin receptor and IRS1 (Song et al. 2013). The specific inhibition of the E3 ubiquitin ligase of MG53 prevents the degradation of insulin receptor and IRS1 and indicate that MG53, acting as an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a key negative regulator of insulin signal in skeletal muscle and that the overexpression of MG53 confers a risk of metabolic disorders (Song et al. 2013). This evidence provides important new insight into the pathophysiology of T2D, but there is no report to date of evidence for this association in a human population. Herein, we investigated the association between MG53 polymorphisms and T2D and IR in four community-based studies in Han Chinese populations.

Methods

Subjects

In the primary stage (discovery phase), our case–control study (Nantong population) consisted of 776 T2D patients (249 men/527 women), 522 IFG subjects (180 men/342 women) and 957 NGT control subjects (331 men/626 women) who were recruited to find positive genetic variants of MG53 for T2D. The participants were selected from a rural population of 14,469 subjects in two towns east of the Nantong City, Jiangsu province in 2008. According to the diabetes diagnosis criteria of the America Diabetes Association (ADA), IFG and T2D are defined by fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels 5.6–7.0 and ≥7.0 mmol/L, respectively, or having a self-reported T2D history, and NGT is defined by a normal FPG of ≤5.6 mmol/L. A questionnaire including age, gender, nationality, education level, physical activity and household income was given to participants to gather demographic characteristics. The interview also included questions associated with the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and cardiovascular events. Weight, height, blood pressure and waist circumference were measured twice by different trained staff members. BMI was calculated as the weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of the height (in metres). A simplified version of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) was applied to evaluate PAI by self-reporting of 24-h physical activity. The PAI was calculated based on the hours and metabolic energy estimate (MET) of physical activities, including sleeping (1 MET), watching TV or sitting (1.1 MET), light activity (1.5 MET), moderate activity (4 MET), and vigorous activity (8 MET). The further replication stage consisted of three study populations, also from Jiangsu province including a case–control study of T2D in an Wuxi City urban population, a baseline survey for cardiovascular disease cohort study of a general rural population in Yixing City and further average 5.18 years follow-up (from May, 2014 to October, 2015) was carried out. A cross-sectional study of an IFG and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) population subjected to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) from the program of metabolic disease surveys in an urban population of Gulou District, Nanjing City. Similarly to the data acquired from the Nantong population, demographic information, disease history, family history of diabetes, behaviour profiling and anthropometric variables, except physical activity, were acquired. The replication case–control study of the Wuxi population was based on a community epidemiological survey, and unrelated ethnic Han Chinese individuals aged more than 30 years were enrolled. A total of 1200 T2D cases defined as above and 1200 age- and gender-matched healthy controls were included. HOMA indices, including HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS and HOMA-β, which were used to assess IR, insulin sensitivity and the function of islet β cells, respectively, were estimated from serum insulin and fasting glucose in 4222 adults aged 30 years or more in the Yixing cohort study. This population included 497 T2D cases, 875 subjects of IFG and 2850 subjects of NGT defined as above. During the community chronic disease survey in Gulou District, Nanjing City, all of the subjects aged more than 40 years who were free of diabetes after fasting glucose and 2-h postprandial glucose detection accepted an OGTT (75 g of glucose) and venous blood samples drew at 0, 30 and 120 min were used to access IR and pancreatic islet β cell function by calculating the AUCs of fasting glucose and insulin. Finally, 1932 individuals were diagnosed with prediabetes, and the numbers of IFG, IGT (2-h blood glucose was 7.8–11.1 mmol/L after 75 g of glucose OGTT) and both IFG and IGT were 329, 1322 and 281, respectively. The methods were approved by the Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing) and were carried out in accordance with the approved relevant guidelines. All of the individuals provided written informed consent before participation in the study.

Sequencing analysis of MG53

MG53 (gene ID: 493829), located on human chromosome 16p11.2 and spanning 14,519 bp, is conserved in animals. To discover single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of MG53, 20 Chinese healthy control subjects and 30 extreme phenotype patients of BMI > 30 and fasting blood glucose >10 mmol/L were selected for MG53 sequencing analysis by the Sanger sequencing method. Twelve pairs of primers covering the entire region of MG53, as well as regions 2 k upstream and 1 k downstream, were designed for amplification and sequencing analysis on the basis of GenBank sequences (Ref. Seq. of MG53 NC_000016). No other variant was identified different from the International HapMap Project (HapMap Data Rel 24/phase II Nov08, on NCBI B36 assembly, dbSNP b126). Thus, two tagSNPs rs7186832 and rs12929077 were selected and further genotyped in this study (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

DNA isolation and genotyping

Blood samples were collected in K3-EDTA tubes. Proteinase K digestion and phenolchloroform extraction were used to isolate genomic DNA from whole blood. Finally, DNA was purified and diluted to 10 ng/μL. Genotyping was performed using TaqMan technology and a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied BioSystems, Foster City, CA, USA). A 5-μl reaction mixture consisting of 10 ng of DNA, 2.4 μL of TaqMan universal PCR master mix, 0.1 μL of forward and reverse primers and FAM and VIC probes, and 1.2 μl of H2O were prepared for PCR reaction. The TaqMan-MGB probes and primers were all ordered from Applied BioSystems. The genotype was determined automatically with the Sequence Detection System 2.1 software (95 % autocaller confidence level). Then, 5 % of the samples were repeated to determine the consistency, which was greater than 99.5 %. The genotype-calling success rates were greater than 99.9 %.

Calculations

Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR, HOMA-β and HOMA-IS) was used to evaluate IR, insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity. These values were calculated using the following equations: HOMA-IR = fasting plasma glucose × fasting plasma insulin/22.5, HOMA-β=20 × fasting plasma insulin/ (fasting plasma glucose-3.5), and HOMA-IS = 1/(fasting plasma insulin × fasting plasma glucose). The unit of fasting plasma glucose was mmol/L, and the unit of fasting plasma insulin was mU/mL. The ratio of insulin increment to FPG increment 30 min after glucose loading (ΔI30/ΔG30, insulin:glucose ratio, IGR) (Seltzer et al. 1967), area under the curves (AUCs) for glucose and insulin 30 and 120 min after glucose loading, and the ratio of AUC of insulin and the AUC of glucose (insulin release index, IRI) (Stumvoll et al. 2000) were calculated to further evaluate the first-stage islet secretory responses to glycaemic stimulus.

Statistical analysis

A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to determine the normality of distribution of quantitative variables. The quantitative variables of non-normal distributions were natural logarithm transformed to obtain normal distributions for statistical analysis. Levene’s test was performed for homogeneity testing. Fisher’s exact test was used to test for HWE in the NGT control group. The genotype and allele distribution between cases (T2D and/or IGT subjects) and NGT control individuals were compared using Chi squared (χ2) tests. A comparison of quantitative variables between different genotypes was performed with ANOVA, and a general linear regression was used to adjust for covariates. An ordinal multinomial logistic regression model was performed to estimate the risk of T2D with or without adjustment for age, gender, BMI, or PAI. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons. The odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were used to test for association in case–control study and the hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % CI by Cox regression were used to estimate the risk of IFG and T2D in cohort study. All of the statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, USA). A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the four studied populations are summarized in Table 1. Age (5 years) and gender matching were performed in the Nantong, Wuxi and Yixing populations. The indices of body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FINS), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-IR and HOMA-IS in the normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and T2D groups increased linearly, and the physical activity index (PAI) and HOMA-β decreased linearly (Ptrend < 0.05).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of NGT, IFG, and T2D subjects in Nantong, Wuxi, Yixing and Gulou populations

CharacteristicsNantong populationWuxi populationYixing populationGulou
NGT (n = 957)IFG (n = 522)T2D (n = 776)NGT (n = 1200)T2D (n = 1200)NGT (n = 2850)IFG (n = 875)T2D (n = 497)Prediabetes (n = 1932)
Female (n %)626 (65.41 %)342 (65.52 %)527 (67.91 %)722 (60.17)722 (60.17 %)1685 (59.12 %)535 (61.14 %)287 (57.74 %)1244 (64.39 %)
Age (years)58.54 ± 9.4758.05 ± 9.9558.17 ± 8.5656.43 ± 8.0257.43 ± 9.7760.33 ± 10.7160.86 ± 10.8861.75 ± 10.30* 58.64 ± 9.26
BMI (kg/m2)21.31 ± 1.5025.75 ± 3.8525.54 ± 3.55** 22.64 ± 2.8624.92 ± 3.41**23.83 ± 3.3124.82 ± 3.4425.08 ± 3.47** 25.07 ± 3.32
Waist circumference (cm)75.49 ± 6.3388.22 ± 10.4388.96 ± 10.35** 81.42 ± 9.4885.41 ± 9.2383.51 ± 9.0986.37 ± 9.3486.83 ± 9.36**
Systolic BP (mmHg)113.79 ± 11.45130.43 ± 19.14132.72 ± 19.52** 118.17 ± 14.88137.47 ± 21.20132.02 ± 15.65135.43 ± 15.60135.39 ± 16.90** 132.61 ± 16.77
Diastolic BP (mmHg)68.28 ± 7.9077.46 ± 11.1078.11 ± 10.86** 75.83 ± 8.6480.12 ± 10.2582.70 ± 806084.13 ± 8.5383.64 ± 8.97** 78.94 ± 10.47
PAI63.46 ± 19.9960.43 ± 20.6853.81 ± 20.91**
FPG (mmol/L)4.18 ± 0.46186.08 ± 0.378.44 ± 3.31** 4.51 ± 0.468.97 ± 3.524.89 ± 0.596.04 ± 0.369.52 ± 3.24** 5.80 ± 0.51
FINS (mU/L)5.74 ± 4.397.36 ± 6.089.65 ± 5.74** 12.51 ± 7.76
HOMA-β81.70 ± 260.9958.47 ± 46.9041.91 ± 54.71** 113.36 ± 75.85
HOMA-IR1.26 ± 0.991.98 ± 1.684.16 ± 4.49** 3.24 ± 2.07
HOMA-IS0.07 ± 0.100.04 ± 0.040.02 ± 0.03** 0.02 ± 0.016

n number of subjects, BMI body mass index, PAI physical activity index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, IR Insulin resistance, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes

* Significant differences in characteristics between NGT, IGT and T2D group (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.0001) were determined by two-tailed Student’s t test for quantitative data (mean ± standard deviation) and two-sided Chi squared test for categorical data (%). HOMA-β and HOMA-IR are log-transformed to follow normal distribution for comparison

Clinical characteristics of NGT, IFG, and T2D subjects in Nantong, Wuxi, Yixing and Gulou populations n number of subjects, BMI body mass index, PAI physical activity index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, IR Insulin resistance, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes * Significant differences in characteristics between NGT, IGT and T2D group (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.0001) were determined by two-tailed Student’s t test for quantitative data (mean ± standard deviation) and two-sided Chi squared test for categorical data (%). HOMA-β and HOMA-IR are log-transformed to follow normal distribution for comparison

Genetic association analyses of case–control study

In Nantong population, both rs7186832 and rs12929077 were confirmed to be in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in the control group (P > 0.05). As shown in Table 2, the additive (TT vs TC vs CC) and dominant (TT vs TC + CC) models of rs7186832 were significantly associated with T2D in the Nantong population after adjusting for BMI, age, gender and PAI. The ORs (95 % CIs) were 1.31 (1.10–1.57) and 1.21 (1.03–1.40), and the P values were 0.014 and 0.003, respectively. After Bonferroni correction, the dominant model of rs7186832 remained statistically significant (P = 0.003 × 6). The AG and GG genotypes (dominant) of rs12929077 carrier showed significant risk of T2D than AA genotype carrier and the OR (95 % CI) was 1.18 (1.02–1.39), P = 0.049, after adjustment for age, gender, BMI and PAI.
Table 2

Associations of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Nantong population

SNPGroupWT/Ht/MTAdditive model (WT vs Ht vs MT)Dominant model (WT vs Ht + MT)
OR (95 % CI)a OR (95 % CI)b OR (95 % CI)c OR (95 % CI)a OR (95 % CI)b OR (95 % CI)c
rs7186832TT/TC/CC
NGT637/282/381.03 (0.89–1.18)1.03 (0.89–1.18)1.21 (1.03–1.40)1.06 (0.91–1.24)1.07 (0.91–1.26)1.31 (1.1–1.57)
IFG360/142/20P = 0.717P = 0.680P = 0.014P = 0.489P = 0.439P = 0.003
T2D502/247/26
rs12929077AA/AG/GG
NGT570/343/410.99 (0.86–1.13)0.99 (0.87–1.14)1.13 (0.98–1.32)1.01 (0.86–1.17)1.02 (0.87–1.19)1.18 (1.02–1.39)
IFG320/182/16P = 0.850P = 0.070P = 0.089P = 0.968P = 0.825P = 0.049
T2D459/283/29

SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes

aP value of χ2 test for comparison of genotype between case and control groups

bOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and PAI

cOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, BMI and PAI

Associations of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Nantong population SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes aP value of χ2 test for comparison of genotype between case and control groups bOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and PAI cOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, BMI and PAI Further stratification analysis by gender showed that the dominant models of rs7186832 and rs12929077 were significantly associated with T2D in the female population, and the ORs (95 % CIs) were 1.58 (1.27–1.96) and 1.34 (1.08–1.65) with P values of 3.9 × 10−5 and 0.006, respectively (Table 3). The association strength of the two SNPs with T2D in females was even higher than that in the whole population, whereas no association was found in the males.
Table 3

Stratification analysis of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Nantong population

SNPGenderGroupWT/Ht/MTAdditive model (WT vs Ht vs MT)Dominant model (WT vs Ht + MT)
OR (95 % CI)a OR (95 % CI)b OR (95 % CI)c OR (95 % CI)a OR (95 % CI)b OR (95 % CI)c
rs7186832TT/TC/CC
MaleNGT204/115/120.83 (0.65–1.05)0.83 (0.65–1.06)0.96 (0.74–1.24)0.75 (0.57–0.99)0.77 (0.58–1.02)0.91 (0.67–1.23)
IGT125/47/8P = 0.121P = 0.136P = 0.743P = 0.049P = 0.071P = 0.538
T2D171/67/10
FemaleNGT433/167/261.15 (0.97–1.36)1.14 (0.97–1.36)1.36 (1.12–1.63)1.25 (1.03–1.53)1.25 (1.03–1.54)1.58 (1.27–1.96)
IGT235/95/12P = 0.114P = 0.177P = 0.001P = 0.024P = 0.026P = 3.9 × 10−5
T2D331/180/16
rs12929077AA/AG/GG
MaleNGT184/133/140.84 (0.66–1.06)0.83 (0.65–1.05)0.94 (0.73–1.22)0.80 (0.61–1.04)0.80 (0.61–1.05)0.82 (0.67–1.24)
IGT111/63/5P = 0.138P = 0.124P = 0.641P = 0.107P = 0.112P = 0.580
T2D154/85/10
FemaleNGT386/210/271.07 (0.91–1.27)1.09 (0.92–1.28)1.24 (1.03–1.47)1.12 (0.93–1.39)1.14 (0.94–1.39)1.34 (1.08–1.65)
IGT209/119/11P = 0.407P = 0.329P = 0.019P = 0.225P = 0.172P = 0.006
T2D305/198/19

SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes

aP value of χ2 test for comparison of genotype between case and control groups

bOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and PAI

cOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, BMI and PAI

Stratification analysis of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Nantong population SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes aP value of χ2 test for comparison of genotype between case and control groups bOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and PAI cOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, BMI and PAI A further assessment of the association of rs7186832 or rs12929077 and T2D was performed in the Wuxi population, in which the association was not significant in this population and stratification analysis by gender (P > 0.05, Table 4).
Table 4

Associations analysis of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Wuxi population

SNPGenderGroupWT/Ht/MTAdditive model (WT vs Ht vs MT)Dominant model (WT vs Ht + MT)
OR (95 % CI)P valueOR (95 % CI)P value
rs7186832Whole populationControl756/392/50
T2D738/391/621.03 (0.89–1.20)0.611.02 (0.85–1.21)0.81
MaleControl289/169/19
T2D286/159/301.03 (0.82–1.30)0.750.97 (0.73–1.28)0.84
FemaleControl467/223/31
T2D452/232/321.04 (0.86–1.26)0.631.06 (0.84–1.33)0.59
rs12929077Whole populationControl726/409/56
T2D716/415/691.04 (0.90–1.21)0.511.04 (0.87–1.24)0.65
MaleControl278/175/21
T2D277/167/341.05 (0.84–1.32)0.640.99 (0.75–1.31)0.96
FemaleControl448/234/35
T2D439/248/351.05 (0.87–1.26)0.601.08 (0.863–1.35)0.49

P value of Logistic regression for comparison of genotype between case and control groups adjusted for BMI, age and gender

SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes

Associations analysis of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Wuxi population P value of Logistic regression for comparison of genotype between case and control groups adjusted for BMI, age and gender SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes

Genetic association analyses of cohort study

In Yixing population, 3490 subjects (84.5 %) were followed, 364 (12.7 %) subjects with NGT were developed to IFG and 53 (1.9 %) were developed to T2D. 110 (12.1 %) subjects with IFG were developed to T2D. Cox regression analyses showed that there was no significant association detected between rs7186832 or rs12929077 and the risk of T2D developing from NGT or IFG (Additional file 1: Table S1). The variation of TC + CC (vs. TT) of rs7186832 and AG/GG (vs. AA) were significantly associated with the risk of IFG developing from NGT in females but not in males after adjustment for age and BMI, and the HRs (95 % CIs) were 1.556 (1.184–2.045) and 1.481 (1.127–1.948) with P values of 0.002 and 0.005, respectively (Table 5).
Table 5

Association of MG53 genotypes with the risk of IFG from NGT in Yixing cohort population

SNPsGenderAdditive modelDominant model
HR (95 % CI)a Pa HR (95 % CI)a Pa
rs7186832Whole population1.077 (0.899–1.291)a 0.421a 1.192 (0.967–1.47)a 0.1a
Male0.821 (0.606–1.112)b 0.202b 0.819 (0.584–1.148)b 0.247b
Female1.283 (1.022–1.611)b 0.032b 1.556 (1.184–2.045)b 0.002b
rs12929077Whole population1.035 (0.869–1.234)a 0.698a 1.116 (0.908–1.373)a 0.297a
Male0.786 (0.588–1.049)b 0.102b 0.758 (0.545–1.053)b 0.098b
Female1.247 (0.998–1.558)b 0.052b 1.481 (1.127–1.948)b 0.005b

SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, P probability

aCox regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and BMI

bCox regression analysis adjusted for age and BMI

Association of MG53 genotypes with the risk of IFG from NGT in Yixing cohort population SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, P probability aCox regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and BMI bCox regression analysis adjusted for age and BMI

Quantitative trait analysis

Quantitative traits of FPG, insulin, HOMA indices and IRS1 were analyzed according to the genotype of MG53. In Yixing population, a linear increase in insulin was observed with the variants of rs12929077 (P = 0.013) in untreated T2D cases, and the insulin concentration in the subjects with AA, AG and GG genotypes was 8.70 ± 8.05, 10.71 ± 11.16 and 13.41 ± 14.26 mU/L, respectively. Both HOMA-IR and HOMA-IS according to the rs12929077 genotype were significantly different, with P values of 0.02 and 0.023, respectively (Table 6). In the IFG group, AA genotype carriers of rs12929077 presented a relatively lower level of insulin and HOMA-IR and a higher HOMA-IS than those of the AG and GG genotypes.
Table 6

Comparison of FINS, FPG and HOMA indices according to the genotypes of MG53 in Yixing population

GroupVariablers7186832rs12929077
TTTCCCAAAGGG
NGTn18369109916811019127
FINS (mU/L)5.76 ± 4.385.75 ± 4.475.21 ± 3.905.77 ± 4.425.72 ± 4.425.29 ± 3.60
FPG (mmol/L)4.89 ± 0.594.90 ± 0.584.80 ± 0.614.90 ± 0.594.89 ± 0.584.87 ± 0.51
HOMA-β80.86 ± 309.3385.29 ± 133.7165.35 ± 110.3780.18 ± 322.5184.92 ± 128.5371.46 ± 99.74
HOMA-IR1.26 ± 0.971.27 ± 1.031.13 ± 0.901.27 ± 0.981.26 ± 1.011.15 ± 0.80
HOMA-IS0.066 ± 0.0990.066 ± 0.9210.662 ± 0.0960.06 ± 0.100.65 ± 0.860.65 ± 0.64
IFGn5692812552031336
FINS (mU/L)7.12 ± 5.437.89 ± 7.306.80 ± 3.896.89 ± 4.868.22 ± 7.76*6.33 ± 3.28
FPG (mmol/L)6.02 ± 0.346.07 ± 0.385.96 ± 0.346.02 ± 0.346.07 ± 0.375.95 ± 0.34
HOMA-β57.07 ± 43.8061.48 ± 53.2955.58 ± 33.2555.07 ± 38.3864.64 ± 59.1151.18 ± 23.93
HOMA-IR1.91 ± 1.472.14 ± 2.071.81 ± 1.061.85 ± 1.332.22 ± 2.16*1.69 ± 0.95
HOMA-IS0.038 ± 0.0410.037 ± 0.0470.034 ± 0.0160.039 ± 0.0420.036 ± 0.0450.033 ± 0.017
T2D (untreated)n230961519711921
FINS (mU/L)8.99 ± 7.8811.72 ± 13.8813.75 ± 16.518.81 ± 8.0510.66 ± 11.59*14.29 ± 14.70
FPG (mmol/L)9.74 ± 3.149.73 ± 3.368.67 ± 1.869.72 ± 3.169.88 ± 3.398.88 ± 1.67
HOMA-β35.11 ± 39.2048.84 ± 72.5667.50 ± 94.1035.31 ± 41.7540.83 ± 51.27*63.03 ± 78.67
HOMA-IR4.06 ± 4.055.09 ± 5.904.79 ± 5.243.93 ± 4.034.86 ± 5.44*5.35 ± 5.18
HOMA-IS0.024 ± 0.0280.020 ± 0.0200.026 ± 0.0370.026 ± 0.0320.018 ± 0.017*0.021 ± 0.021
T2D (treated)n10444895538
FINS (mU/L)8.21 ± 6.0110.23 ± 10.9412.09 ± 14.308.47 ± 6.4511.03 ± 13.388.88 ± 4.42
FPG (mmol/L)9.27 ± 3.568.80 ± 3.089.95 ± 2.939.03 ± 3.279.25 ± 3.6910.01 ± 2.95
HOMA-β41.6847.6852.81 ± 72.1541.99 ± 53.9545.12 ± 50.9154.97 ± 88.7430.30 ± 13.73
HOMA-IR3.52 ± 3.833.88 ± 4.115.25 ± 5.643.40 ± 3.314.50 ± 5.494.01 ± 4.15
HOMA-IS0.025 ± 0.0290.026 ± 0.0260.021 ± 0.0210.25 ± 0.0290.027 ± 0.0260.016 ± 0.012

Comparison of FINS, FPG, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS between genotypes rs7186832 and rs12929077 were adjusted for age, gender and BMI by general linear regression; Significant P value (P < 0.05) was observed and marker by “*” for comparing AG to AA of rs12929077, a linear increase in insulin was observed with the variants of rs12929077 (P = 0.013) in untreated T2D subjects. FINS, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS are log-transformed for comparison

NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, T2D type 2 diabetes, n number of subjects, BMI body mass index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, IR insulin resistance, IS insulin sensitivity

Comparison of FINS, FPG and HOMA indices according to the genotypes of MG53 in Yixing population Comparison of FINS, FPG, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS between genotypes rs7186832 and rs12929077 were adjusted for age, gender and BMI by general linear regression; Significant P value (P < 0.05) was observed and marker by “*” for comparing AG to AA of rs12929077, a linear increase in insulin was observed with the variants of rs12929077 (P = 0.013) in untreated T2D subjects. FINS, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS are log-transformed for comparison NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, T2D type 2 diabetes, n number of subjects, BMI body mass index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, IR insulin resistance, IS insulin sensitivity No statistically significant difference in IRS1 levels was observed among the different genotypes of rs7186832 and rs12929077 in each group or in the whole population (Additional file 1: Table S2). A correlation analysis showed that IRS1 was significantly correlated with FPG (r = 0.131, P = 0.03) in 275 randomly selected subjects; however, this correlation could not be replicated in the NGT or IFG subgroups or in the untreated T2D population (Additional file 1: Table S3). No statistical correlation was observed between IRS1 and FINS or HOMA-β, HOMA-IR and HOMA-IS (P > 0.05). In the Gulou population, no significant difference in glucose, insulin or the indices of OGTT and HOMA was detected among the genotypes of MG53 SNPs (Additional file 1: Table S4) after glucose loading. Further stratification analysis showed that the 30-min glucose, the area under the curve (AUC) of 30-min glucose and the AUC of 120-min glucose increased significantly with the CC genotype (vs TT + TC) of rs7186832 and the GG genotype (vs AA + AG) of rs12929077 in males but not in females (Fig. 1). The results of stratification analysis by gender are listed in Additional file 1: Table S5.
Fig. 1

Stratification analysis showed that 30 min glucose (a1, a2), AUC of 30 min glucose (b1, b2) and AUC of 30 min glucose (c1, c2) after glucose load increase significantly in CC genotype (vs TT + TC) of rs7186832 carriers and GG genotype (vs AA + AG) of rs12929077 in males but not in females

Stratification analysis showed that 30 min glucose (a1, a2), AUC of 30 min glucose (b1, b2) and AUC of 30 min glucose (c1, c2) after glucose load increase significantly in CC genotype (vs TT + TC) of rs7186832 carriers and GG genotype (vs AA + AG) of rs12929077 in males but not in females

Discussion

MG53, also known as tripartite motif 72 (TRIM72) in humans, is a newly identified member of the tripartite motif-containing (TRIM) family and is specifically expressed in the skeletal muscle and heart. The up-regulation of MG53 has been observed in high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice, db/db diabetic mice, spontaneously hypertensive rats and non-human primate models of metabolic syndrome as compared to control animals. Ko et al. have confirmed that MG53 overexpression inhibits IRS1 phosphorylation and myogenesis in C2C12 myoblasts (Lee et al. 2010), and the insulin receptor and IRS1 levels notably changed when the insulin signal pathway is blocked. In this study, we observed positive association of MG53 polymorphisms and IFG and T2D in females in Nantong rural population but not in Wuxi urban populations. In Yixing rural population of cohort study, the association of MG53 polymorphisms and IFG was further replicated in females. These findings support that MG53 variants might confer risk susceptibility to the development of T2D of females in rural population. Furthermore, in Yixing rural population, FINS linearly increased with the variation of rs12929077 in the untreated T2D population, and differential HOMA-β, HOMA-IR and HOMA-IS were observed in both the IFG group and untreated T2D population. The above results verify the population-based evidence associating MG53 with HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS, and T2D in the Han Chinese population. The findings from the present study thus confirm the role of MG53 in IR (Song et al. 2013). In addition, the genetic effects of MG53 on islet beta cell secretion and regulating blood glucose function by OGTT were evaluated in Gulou urban population and the results indicated that the 30-min glucose, AUC of 30 min glucose and AUC of 120-min glucose increased with the variation of rs7186832 and rs12929077 in males but not in females. These findings provide further evidence strengthening the impact of MG53 on the development of T2D. We further evaluated a regional LD plot (http://www.broadinstitute.org/mpg/snap/ldplot.php) of the two positive SNPs in T2D (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The LD values (r2) were estimated for neighbouring loci and rs7186832 (r2 > 0.9) and rs12929077 (r2 > 0.8). We suggest that these closely linked loci need to be considered to further evaluate the genetic effect of MG53 in T2D. Although the SNP rs7186832 in exon 3 is a synonymous variant, an online bioinformatics prediction tool (http://snpinfo.niehs.nih.gov/cgi-bin/snpinfo/snpfunc.cgi) indicated that the rs7186832 C > T variant acts in splicing regulation (Exon Splicing Silencer, ESS) for MG53, and the rs12929077 G > A variant is associated with transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) to AP2α (core match score = 0.996) and BRCA (core match score = 0.994). The AP2α transcription factor belongs to a family of three closely related nuclear proteins that regulate genes involved in development, apoptosis, and cell cycle control (Hilger-Eversheim et al. 2000). A previous study has reported that the AP2a site acts as a positive regulator on site 5 in SLC2A10, which encodes high-affinity glucose transporter 10 (GLUT10) (Segade et al. 2005). GLUT10 is widely expressed in adult tissues, including organs that play major roles in glucose homeostasis (Rothman et al. 1995), and the haplotype of SLC2A10 is modestly associated with T2D (Lin et al. 2006). BRCA (breast cancer, early onset) encodes a nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and a previous study has reported that after a diagnosis of, women breast cancer with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation face a twofold increase in the risk of diabetes (Bordeleau et al. 2011). These data provide considerable biologic plausibility for a role of MG53 in glucose homeostasis, insulin signal regulation and T2D. This study did not identify the IRS1 level correlating with the variants of MG53 or the HOMA index. Given the tissue specificity of MG53 and factors affecting the IRS1 level in plasma (Krutzfeldt et al. 2000; Chibalin et al. 2000), the plasma IRS1 level may only partly reflect MG53 expression. Meanwhile, this discrepancy may indicate that IRS1 might not directly interfere with the genetic effects of MG53 on pancreatic β cell function, IR or T2D, and further research on IRS1 function is warranted. Besides the potential bias in case–control studies, there are some limitations as follows. Owing to a lack of an appropriate ELISA kit and muscle tissues, plasma MG53 expression levels could not be detected; thus, correlations between MG53 polymorphisms, MG53 expression and T2D risk could not be established in our study population. Regardless of the above limitation, this study provides updated evidence of MG53 polymorphisms, HOMA indices and T2D. In case of potential type I error, further replication study in large sample size population would be warranted. Conclusively, our study constitutes an initial examination to investigate whether MG53 variants are associated with T2D, and the findings provide new insight into the molecular mechanism of MG53 involved in the pathogenesis of T2D through the effects on pancreatic β-cell function and IR. Additional file 1. Supplementary material contains supplementary tables 1 to 5 and supplementary figure.
  29 in total

1.  Exercise-induced changes in expression and activity of proteins involved in insulin signal transduction in skeletal muscle: differential effects on insulin-receptor substrates 1 and 2.

Authors:  A V Chibalin; M Yu; J W Ryder; X M Song; D Galuska; A Krook; H Wallberg-Henriksson; J R Zierath
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence supporting a passive role for the insulin receptor transmembrane domain in insulin-dependent signal transduction.

Authors:  A L Frattali; J L Treadway; J E Pessin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The role of insulin receptor autophosphorylation in signal transduction.

Authors:  M S Murakami; O M Rosen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  The global burden of diabetes and its complications: an emerging pandemic.

Authors:  Susan van Dieren; Joline W J Beulens; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Diederick E Grobbee; Bruce Neal
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2010-05

5.  Insulin receptor kinase in human skeletal muscle from obese subjects with and without noninsulin dependent diabetes.

Authors:  J F Caro; M K Sinha; S M Raju; O Ittoop; W J Pories; E G Flickinger; D Meelheim; G L Dohm
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Hypercholesterolemia blocked sevoflurane-induced cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury by alteration of the MG53/RISK/GSK3β signaling.

Authors:  Lei-Lei Ma; Feng-Jiang Zhang; Ling-Bo Qian; Fei-Juan Kong; Jun-Feng Sun; Cheng Zhou; Yu-Nan Peng; Hong-Jiao Xu; Wen-Na Wang; Chuan-Yun Wen; Man-Hua Zhu; Gang Chen; Li-Na Yu; Xian-Bao Liu; Jian-An Wang; Min Yan
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  TRIM72 negatively regulates myogenesis via targeting insulin receptor substrate-1.

Authors:  C S Lee; J-S Yi; S-Y Jung; B-W Kim; N-R Lee; H-J Choo; S-Y Jang; J Han; S-G Chi; M Park; J-H Lee; Y-G Ko
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  A muscle-specific insulin receptor knockout exhibits features of the metabolic syndrome of NIDDM without altering glucose tolerance.

Authors:  J C Brüning; M D Michael; J N Winnay; T Hayashi; D Hörsch; D Accili; L J Goodyear; C R Kahn
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Diabetes: the genetic connections.

Authors:  D A Pyke
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Insulin receptor phosphorylation, insulin receptor substrate-1 phosphorylation, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity are decreased in intact skeletal muscle strips from obese subjects.

Authors:  L J Goodyear; F Giorgino; L A Sherman; J Carey; R J Smith; G L Dohm
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  2 in total

1.  Relationships between Hoffa fragment size and surgical approach selection: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Wich Orapiriyakul; Theerachai Apivatthakakul; Chanakarn Phornphutkul
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Waist-to-height ratio, an optimal anthropometric indicator for metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease in the Western Chinese male population.

Authors:  Jinwei Cai; Cuiting Lin; Shuiqing Lai; Yingshan Liu; Min Liang; Yingfen Qin; Xinghuan Liang; Aihua Tan; Yong Gao; Zheng Lu; Chunlei Wu; Shengzhu Huang; Xiaobo Yang; Haiying Zhang; Jian Kuang; Zengnan Mo
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.876

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.