| Literature DB >> 28443211 |
Song Yang1, Hailong Zhao2, Kuangfeng Xu3, Yun Qian4, Ming Wu5, Tao Yang3, Yanchun Chen1, Xianghai Zhao1, Jinfeng Chen6, Jinbo Wen2, Zhibing Hu2, Harvest F Gu7, Hongbing Shen2, Chong Shen2,6.
Abstract
Abnormally increased skeletal-muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase (MG53) is associated with the inhibition of insulin signalling and insulin resistance (IR) in animal models. Four community-based studies of Han Chinese populations were included in this study to test the association of variants of MG53 and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The results showed that rs7186832 and rs12929077 in MG53 were significantly associated with T2D and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) of females in the discovery-stage case-control study and cohort study respectively of rural population but not in the replication sample of urban population. In rural population, the fasting insulin (mU/L) of the subjects with AA, AG and GG genotypes in rs12929077 were 8.70 ± 8.05, 10.71 ± 11.16 and 13.41 ± 14.26, respectively, and increased linearly in T2D cases without medication treatment (P = 0.04). This variant was significantly associated with HOMA-IR (P = 0.020) and HOMA-IS (P = 0.023). In individuals with IFG, the insulin and HOMA-IR of AG carriers were significantly higher than those of AA carriers. In urban population, after glucose loading, there were significant differences in the 30-min glucose, the area under the curve (AUC) of 30-min glucose and the AUC of 120-min glucose according to the genotypes of rs7186832 and rs12929077 in males but not females. Our findings suggest that MG53 variants might confer risk susceptibility to the development of T2D of females and IR particularly in rural population.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic association; Insulin resistance; Insulin sensitivity; MG53; Type 2 diabetes
Year: 2016 PMID: 28443211 PMCID: PMC5395513 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2218-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Clinical characteristics of NGT, IFG, and T2D subjects in Nantong, Wuxi, Yixing and Gulou populations
| Characteristics | Nantong population | Wuxi population | Yixing population | Gulou | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NGT (n = 957) | IFG (n = 522) | T2D (n = 776) | NGT (n = 1200) | T2D (n = 1200) | NGT (n = 2850) | IFG (n = 875) | T2D (n = 497) | Prediabetes (n = 1932) | |
| Female (n %) | 626 (65.41 %) | 342 (65.52 %) | 527 (67.91 %) | 722 (60.17) | 722 (60.17 %) | 1685 (59.12 %) | 535 (61.14 %) | 287 (57.74 %) | 1244 (64.39 %) |
| Age (years) | 58.54 ± 9.47 | 58.05 ± 9.95 | 58.17 ± 8.56 | 56.43 ± 8.02 | 57.43 ± 9.77 | 60.33 ± 10.71 | 60.86 ± 10.88 | 61.75 ± 10.30* | 58.64 ± 9.26 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.31 ± 1.50 | 25.75 ± 3.85 | 25.54 ± 3.55** | 22.64 ± 2.86 | 24.92 ± 3.41** | 23.83 ± 3.31 | 24.82 ± 3.44 | 25.08 ± 3.47** | 25.07 ± 3.32 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 75.49 ± 6.33 | 88.22 ± 10.43 | 88.96 ± 10.35** | 81.42 ± 9.48 | 85.41 ± 9.23 | 83.51 ± 9.09 | 86.37 ± 9.34 | 86.83 ± 9.36** | |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 113.79 ± 11.45 | 130.43 ± 19.14 | 132.72 ± 19.52** | 118.17 ± 14.88 | 137.47 ± 21.20 | 132.02 ± 15.65 | 135.43 ± 15.60 | 135.39 ± 16.90** | 132.61 ± 16.77 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 68.28 ± 7.90 | 77.46 ± 11.10 | 78.11 ± 10.86** | 75.83 ± 8.64 | 80.12 ± 10.25 | 82.70 ± 8060 | 84.13 ± 8.53 | 83.64 ± 8.97** | 78.94 ± 10.47 |
| PAI | 63.46 ± 19.99 | 60.43 ± 20.68 | 53.81 ± 20.91** | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 4.18 ± 0.4618 | 6.08 ± 0.37 | 8.44 ± 3.31** | 4.51 ± 0.46 | 8.97 ± 3.52 | 4.89 ± 0.59 | 6.04 ± 0.36 | 9.52 ± 3.24** | 5.80 ± 0.51 |
| FINS (mU/L) | – | – | – | – | – | 5.74 ± 4.39 | 7.36 ± 6.08 | 9.65 ± 5.74** | 12.51 ± 7.76 |
| HOMA-β | – | – | – | – | – | 81.70 ± 260.99 | 58.47 ± 46.90 | 41.91 ± 54.71** | 113.36 ± 75.85 |
| HOMA-IR | – | – | – | – | – | 1.26 ± 0.99 | 1.98 ± 1.68 | 4.16 ± 4.49** | 3.24 ± 2.07 |
| HOMA-IS | – | – | – | – | – | 0.07 ± 0.10 | 0.04 ± 0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.03** | 0.02 ± 0.016 |
n number of subjects, BMI body mass index, PAI physical activity index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, IR Insulin resistance, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes
* Significant differences in characteristics between NGT, IGT and T2D group (* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.0001) were determined by two-tailed Student’s t test for quantitative data (mean ± standard deviation) and two-sided Chi squared test for categorical data (%). HOMA-β and HOMA-IR are log-transformed to follow normal distribution for comparison
Associations of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Nantong population
| SNP | Group | WT/Ht/MT | Additive model (WT vs Ht vs MT) | Dominant model (WT vs Ht + MT) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI)a | OR (95 % CI)b | OR (95 % CI)c | OR (95 % CI)a | OR (95 % CI)b | OR (95 % CI)c | |||
| rs7186832 | TT/TC/CC | |||||||
| NGT | 637/282/38 | 1.03 (0.89–1.18) | 1.03 (0.89–1.18) | 1.21 (1.03–1.40) | 1.06 (0.91–1.24) | 1.07 (0.91–1.26) | 1.31 (1.1–1.57) | |
| IFG | 360/142/20 | P = 0.717 | P = 0.680 | P = 0.014 | P = 0.489 | P = 0.439 | P = 0.003 | |
| T2D | 502/247/26 | |||||||
| rs12929077 | AA/AG/GG | |||||||
| NGT | 570/343/41 | 0.99 (0.86–1.13) | 0.99 (0.87–1.14) | 1.13 (0.98–1.32) | 1.01 (0.86–1.17) | 1.02 (0.87–1.19) | 1.18 (1.02–1.39) | |
| IFG | 320/182/16 | P = 0.850 | P = 0.070 | P = 0.089 | P = 0.968 | P = 0.825 | P = 0.049 | |
| T2D | 459/283/29 | |||||||
SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes
aP value of χ2 test for comparison of genotype between case and control groups
bOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and PAI
cOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, BMI and PAI
Stratification analysis of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Nantong population
| SNP | Gender | Group | WT/Ht/MT | Additive model (WT vs Ht vs MT) | Dominant model (WT vs Ht + MT) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI)a | OR (95 % CI)b | OR (95 % CI)c | OR (95 % CI)a | OR (95 % CI)b | OR (95 % CI)c | ||||
| rs7186832 | TT/TC/CC | ||||||||
| Male | NGT | 204/115/12 | 0.83 (0.65–1.05) | 0.83 (0.65–1.06) | 0.96 (0.74–1.24) | 0.75 (0.57–0.99) | 0.77 (0.58–1.02) | 0.91 (0.67–1.23) | |
| IGT | 125/47/8 | P = 0.121 | P = 0.136 | P = 0.743 | P = 0.049 | P = 0.071 | P = 0.538 | ||
| T2D | 171/67/10 | ||||||||
| Female | NGT | 433/167/26 | 1.15 (0.97–1.36) | 1.14 (0.97–1.36) | 1.36 (1.12–1.63) | 1.25 (1.03–1.53) | 1.25 (1.03–1.54) | 1.58 (1.27–1.96) | |
| IGT | 235/95/12 | P = 0.114 | P = 0.177 | P = 0.001 | P = 0.024 | P = 0.026 | P = 3.9 × 10−5 | ||
| T2D | 331/180/16 | ||||||||
| rs12929077 | AA/AG/GG | ||||||||
| Male | NGT | 184/133/14 | 0.84 (0.66–1.06) | 0.83 (0.65–1.05) | 0.94 (0.73–1.22) | 0.80 (0.61–1.04) | 0.80 (0.61–1.05) | 0.82 (0.67–1.24) | |
| IGT | 111/63/5 | P = 0.138 | P = 0.124 | P = 0.641 | P = 0.107 | P = 0.112 | P = 0.580 | ||
| T2D | 154/85/10 | ||||||||
| Female | NGT | 386/210/27 | 1.07 (0.91–1.27) | 1.09 (0.92–1.28) | 1.24 (1.03–1.47) | 1.12 (0.93–1.39) | 1.14 (0.94–1.39) | 1.34 (1.08–1.65) | |
| IGT | 209/119/11 | P = 0.407 | P = 0.329 | P = 0.019 | P = 0.225 | P = 0.172 | P = 0.006 | ||
| T2D | 305/198/19 | ||||||||
SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes
aP value of χ2 test for comparison of genotype between case and control groups
bOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and PAI
cOrdinal multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, BMI and PAI
Associations analysis of MG53 rs7186832 and rs12929077 with T2D in Wuxi population
| SNP | Gender | Group | WT/Ht/MT | Additive model (WT vs Ht vs MT) | Dominant model (WT vs Ht + MT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95 % CI) | P value | OR (95 % CI) | P value | ||||
| rs7186832 | Whole population | Control | 756/392/50 | ||||
| T2D | 738/391/62 | 1.03 (0.89–1.20) | 0.61 | 1.02 (0.85–1.21) | 0.81 | ||
| Male | Control | 289/169/19 | |||||
| T2D | 286/159/30 | 1.03 (0.82–1.30) | 0.75 | 0.97 (0.73–1.28) | 0.84 | ||
| Female | Control | 467/223/31 | |||||
| T2D | 452/232/32 | 1.04 (0.86–1.26) | 0.63 | 1.06 (0.84–1.33) | 0.59 | ||
| rs12929077 | Whole population | Control | 726/409/56 | ||||
| T2D | 716/415/69 | 1.04 (0.90–1.21) | 0.51 | 1.04 (0.87–1.24) | 0.65 | ||
| Male | Control | 278/175/21 | |||||
| T2D | 277/167/34 | 1.05 (0.84–1.32) | 0.64 | 0.99 (0.75–1.31) | 0.96 | ||
| Female | Control | 448/234/35 | |||||
| T2D | 439/248/35 | 1.05 (0.87–1.26) | 0.60 | 1.08 (0.863–1.35) | 0.49 | ||
P value of Logistic regression for comparison of genotype between case and control groups adjusted for BMI, age and gender
SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, WT wild type, Ht heterozygote, MT mutant type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, P probability, T2D type 2 diabetes
Association of MG53 genotypes with the risk of IFG from NGT in Yixing cohort population
| SNPs | Gender | Additive model | Dominant model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95 % CI)a | Pa | HR (95 % CI)a | Pa | ||
| rs7186832 | Whole population | 1.077 (0.899–1.291)a | 0.421a | 1.192 (0.967–1.47)a | 0.1a |
| Male | 0.821 (0.606–1.112)b | 0.202b | 0.819 (0.584–1.148)b | 0.247b | |
| Female | 1.283 (1.022–1.611)b | 0.032b | 1.556 (1.184–2.045)b | 0.002b | |
| rs12929077 | Whole population | 1.035 (0.869–1.234)a | 0.698a | 1.116 (0.908–1.373)a | 0.297a |
| Male | 0.786 (0.588–1.049)b | 0.102b | 0.758 (0.545–1.053)b | 0.098b | |
| Female | 1.247 (0.998–1.558)b | 0.052b | 1.481 (1.127–1.948)b | 0.005b | |
SNP single nuclear polymorphisms, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, P probability
aCox regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and BMI
bCox regression analysis adjusted for age and BMI
Comparison of FINS, FPG and HOMA indices according to the genotypes of MG53 in Yixing population
| Group | Variable | rs7186832 | rs12929077 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | TC | CC | AA | AG | GG | ||
| NGT | n | 1836 | 910 | 99 | 1681 | 1019 | 127 |
| FINS (mU/L) | 5.76 ± 4.38 | 5.75 ± 4.47 | 5.21 ± 3.90 | 5.77 ± 4.42 | 5.72 ± 4.42 | 5.29 ± 3.60 | |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 4.89 ± 0.59 | 4.90 ± 0.58 | 4.80 ± 0.61 | 4.90 ± 0.59 | 4.89 ± 0.58 | 4.87 ± 0.51 | |
| HOMA-β | 80.86 ± 309.33 | 85.29 ± 133.71 | 65.35 ± 110.37 | 80.18 ± 322.51 | 84.92 ± 128.53 | 71.46 ± 99.74 | |
| HOMA-IR | 1.26 ± 0.97 | 1.27 ± 1.03 | 1.13 ± 0.90 | 1.27 ± 0.98 | 1.26 ± 1.01 | 1.15 ± 0.80 | |
| HOMA-IS | 0.066 ± 0.099 | 0.066 ± 0.921 | 0.662 ± 0.096 | 0.06 ± 0.10 | 0.65 ± 0.86 | 0.65 ± 0.64 | |
| IFG | n | 569 | 281 | 25 | 520 | 313 | 36 |
| FINS (mU/L) | 7.12 ± 5.43 | 7.89 ± 7.30 | 6.80 ± 3.89 | 6.89 ± 4.86 | 8.22 ± 7.76* | 6.33 ± 3.28 | |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 6.02 ± 0.34 | 6.07 ± 0.38 | 5.96 ± 0.34 | 6.02 ± 0.34 | 6.07 ± 0.37 | 5.95 ± 0.34 | |
| HOMA-β | 57.07 ± 43.80 | 61.48 ± 53.29 | 55.58 ± 33.25 | 55.07 ± 38.38 | 64.64 ± 59.11 | 51.18 ± 23.93 | |
| HOMA-IR | 1.91 ± 1.47 | 2.14 ± 2.07 | 1.81 ± 1.06 | 1.85 ± 1.33 | 2.22 ± 2.16* | 1.69 ± 0.95 | |
| HOMA-IS | 0.038 ± 0.041 | 0.037 ± 0.047 | 0.034 ± 0.016 | 0.039 ± 0.042 | 0.036 ± 0.045 | 0.033 ± 0.017 | |
| T2D (untreated) | n | 230 | 96 | 15 | 197 | 119 | 21 |
| FINS (mU/L) | 8.99 ± 7.88 | 11.72 ± 13.88 | 13.75 ± 16.51 | 8.81 ± 8.05 | 10.66 ± 11.59* | 14.29 ± 14.70 | |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 9.74 ± 3.14 | 9.73 ± 3.36 | 8.67 ± 1.86 | 9.72 ± 3.16 | 9.88 ± 3.39 | 8.88 ± 1.67 | |
| HOMA-β | 35.11 ± 39.20 | 48.84 ± 72.56 | 67.50 ± 94.10 | 35.31 ± 41.75 | 40.83 ± 51.27* | 63.03 ± 78.67 | |
| HOMA-IR | 4.06 ± 4.05 | 5.09 ± 5.90 | 4.79 ± 5.24 | 3.93 ± 4.03 | 4.86 ± 5.44* | 5.35 ± 5.18 | |
| HOMA-IS | 0.024 ± 0.028 | 0.020 ± 0.020 | 0.026 ± 0.037 | 0.026 ± 0.032 | 0.018 ± 0.017* | 0.021 ± 0.021 | |
| T2D (treated) | n | 104 | 44 | 8 | 95 | 53 | 8 |
| FINS (mU/L) | 8.21 ± 6.01 | 10.23 ± 10.94 | 12.09 ± 14.30 | 8.47 ± 6.45 | 11.03 ± 13.38 | 8.88 ± 4.42 | |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 9.27 ± 3.56 | 8.80 ± 3.08 | 9.95 ± 2.93 | 9.03 ± 3.27 | 9.25 ± 3.69 | 10.01 ± 2.95 | |
| HOMA-β | 41.6847.68 | 52.81 ± 72.15 | 41.99 ± 53.95 | 45.12 ± 50.91 | 54.97 ± 88.74 | 30.30 ± 13.73 | |
| HOMA-IR | 3.52 ± 3.83 | 3.88 ± 4.11 | 5.25 ± 5.64 | 3.40 ± 3.31 | 4.50 ± 5.49 | 4.01 ± 4.15 | |
| HOMA-IS | 0.025 ± 0.029 | 0.026 ± 0.026 | 0.021 ± 0.021 | 0.25 ± 0.029 | 0.027 ± 0.026 | 0.016 ± 0.012 | |
Comparison of FINS, FPG, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS between genotypes rs7186832 and rs12929077 were adjusted for age, gender and BMI by general linear regression; Significant P value (P < 0.05) was observed and marker by “*” for comparing AG to AA of rs12929077, a linear increase in insulin was observed with the variants of rs12929077 (P = 0.013) in untreated T2D subjects. FINS, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, HOMA-IS are log-transformed for comparison
NGT normal glucose tolerance, IFG impaired fasting glucose, T2D type 2 diabetes, n number of subjects, BMI body mass index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, FINS fasting insulin, HOMA homeostasis model assessment, IR insulin resistance, IS insulin sensitivity
Fig. 1Stratification analysis showed that 30 min glucose (a1, a2), AUC of 30 min glucose (b1, b2) and AUC of 30 min glucose (c1, c2) after glucose load increase significantly in CC genotype (vs TT + TC) of rs7186832 carriers and GG genotype (vs AA + AG) of rs12929077 in males but not in females