| Literature DB >> 28442456 |
Allisson Dantas Oliveira1,2, Clara Prats3, Mateu Espasa4, Francesc Zarzuela Serrat4, Cristina Montañola Sales3, Aroa Silgado4, Daniel Lopez Codina3, Mercia Eliane Arruda5,6, Jordi Gomez I Prat4, Jones Albuquerque1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria is a public health problem that affects remote areas worldwide. Climate change has contributed to the problem by allowing for the survival of Anopheles in previously uninhabited areas. As such, several groups have made developing news systems for the automated diagnosis of malaria a priority.Entities:
Keywords: applied computing; artificial intelligence; automated diagnosis; malaria; mobile devices
Year: 2017 PMID: 28442456 PMCID: PMC5424126 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.6758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Res Protoc ISSN: 1929-0748
Figure 1Equations.
Figure 2Haar-like features.
Figure 3Flowchart of the experimental model.
Figure 4Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) was used as support for the tablet (left) and mobile phone (right).
Figure 5Image preprocessing steps.
The 10-fold, cross-validation procedure on 10-, 15-, and 20-stage cascades.
| Cascade | Iteration (K) | Specificity | Recall or sensitivity | Accuracy | PRa |
| 10-stage | |||||
| 1 | 0.7075 | 0.7272 | 0.7096 | 0.2272 | |
| 2 | 0.9331 | 0.6428 | 0.9019 | 0.5373 | |
| 3 | 0.6414 | 0.8070 | 0.6596 | 0.2169 | |
| 4 | 0.8838 | 0.6545 | 0.8596 | 0.4000 | |
| 5 | 0.8731 | 0.7090 | 0.8557 | 0.3979 | |
| 6 | 0.8666 | 0.8727 | 0.8673 | 0.4363 | |
| 7 | 0.3383 | 0.6785 | 0.375 | 0.1101 | |
| 8 | 0.1626 | 0.8983 | 0.2461 | 0.1207 | |
| 9 | 0.6206 | 0.7857 | 0.6384 | 0.2000 | |
| 10 | 0.7960 | 0.8437 | 0.8019 | 0.3673 | |
| 15-stage | |||||
| 1 | 0.9548 | 0.5090 | 0.9076 | 0.5714 | |
| 2 | 0.9892 | 0.4000 | 0.9269 | 0.8148 | |
| 3 | 0.9137 | 0.6964 | 0.8903 | 0.4936 | |
| 4 | 0.9634 | 0.7636 | 0.9423 | 0.7118 | |
| 5 | 0.9590 | 0.7142 | 0.9326 | 0.6779 | |
| 6 | 0.9482 | 0.9107 | 0.9442 | 0.6800 | |
| 7 | 0.8134 | 0.7627 | 0.8076 | 0.3435 | |
| 8 | 0.8599 | 0.6607 | 0.8384 | 0.3627 | |
| 9 | 0.8663 | 0.7500 | 0.8538 | 0.4038 | |
| 10 | 0.9234 | 0.7301 | 0.9000 | 0.5679 | |
| 20-stage | |||||
| 1 | 0.9913 | 0.1636 | 0.9038 | 0.6923 | |
| 2 | 0.9956 | 0.1818 | 0.9096 | 0.8333 | |
| 3 | 0.9698 | 0.4464 | 0.9134 | 0.6410 | |
| 4 | 0.9655 | 0.7500 | 0.9423 | 0.7241 | |
| 5 | 0.9698 | 0.8035 | 0.9519 | 0.7627 | |
| 6 | 0.9590 | 0.8214 | 0.9442 | 0.7076 | |
| 7 | 0.9092 | 0.6491 | 0.8807 | 0.4683 | |
| 8 | 0.9652 | 0.4576 | 0.9076 | 0.6279 | |
| 9 | 0.9202 | 0.7500 | 0.9019 | 0.5316 | |
| 10 | 0.9650 | 0.4677 | 0.9057 | 0.6444 |
aPR: precision rate.
Metric results reported as means (SDs).
| Metric | Stage | Mean (SD) |
| Recall or sensitivitya | ||
| 10 | 0.7619851 (0.092387416) | |
| 15 | 0.6897741 (0.142576715) | |
| 20 | 0.5491375 (0.244642849) | |
| Specificityb | ||
| 10 | 0.6823637 (0.2541448) | |
| 15 | 0.9191804 (0.0558795) | |
| 20 | 0.9611227 (0.0272376) | |
| Average accuracy | ||
| 10 | 0.6915384 (0.2224334) | |
| 15 | 0.8938034 (0.0497291) | |
| 20 | 0.9161538 (0.0225766) | |
| PRc | ||
| 10 | 0.3014110 (0.1450627) | |
| 15 | 0.5627748 (0.1602032) | |
| 20 | 0.6633560 (0.1068479) |
aFalse positive rate.
bFalse positive rate.
cPR: precision rate.
Figure 6Precision-recall curve of the four iterations of the cross-validation method.
Prototype development flow.
| Algorithm | ||
| 1: initialize camera | ||
| 2: set the camera resolution to 640 x 480 pixels | ||
| 3: | ||
| 4: | view image in camera | |
| 5: | perform to image scanning through windows 24 x 24 pixels (multi-scale) | |
| 6: | ||
| 7: | mark the object and count | |
| 8: | ||
| 9: | ||
| 10: | ||
| 11: | ||
| 12: | close the application and release the camera | |
| 13: | ||