Literature DB >> 28442339

Neural evidence for the subliminal processing of facial trustworthiness in infancy.

Sarah Jessen1, Tobias Grossmann2.   

Abstract

Face evaluation is thought to play a vital role in human social interactions. One prominent aspect is the evaluation of facial signs of trustworthiness, which has been shown to occur reliably, rapidly, and without conscious awareness in adults. Recent developmental work indicates that the sensitivity to facial trustworthiness has early ontogenetic origins as it can already be observed in infancy. However, it is unclear whether infants' sensitivity to facial signs of trustworthiness relies upon conscious processing of a face or, similar to adults, occurs also in response to subliminal faces. To investigate this question, we conducted an event-related brain potential (ERP) study, in which we presented 7-month-old infants with faces varying in trustworthiness. Facial stimuli were presented subliminally (below infants' face visibility threshold) for only 50ms and then masked by presenting a scrambled face image. Our data revealed that infants' ERP responses to subliminally presented faces differed as a function of trustworthiness. Specifically, untrustworthy faces elicited an enhanced negative slow wave (800-1000ms) at frontal and central electrodes. The current findings critically extend prior work by showing that, similar to adults, infants' neural detection of facial signs of trustworthiness occurs also in response to subliminal face. This supports the view that detecting facial trustworthiness is an early developing and automatic process in humans.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Face perception; Infancy; Subliminal processing; Trustworthiness

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28442339     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

Review 1.  Ritual and the origins of first impressions.

Authors:  Harriet Over; Adam Eggleston; Richard Cook
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Reply to Cook and Over: Social learning and evolutionary mechanisms are not mutually exclusive.

Authors:  Clare A M Sutherland; Jemma R Collova; Romina Palermo; Laura Germine; Gillian Rhodes; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Nichola S Burton; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Peak selection and latency jitter correction in developmental event-related potentials.

Authors:  Maggie W Guy; Stefania Conte; Aslı Bursalıoğlu; John E Richards
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Preferential looking studies of trustworthiness detection confound structural and expressive cues to facial trustworthiness.

Authors:  Adam Eggleston; Maria Tsantani; Harriet Over; Richard Cook
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Facial impression of trustworthiness biases statement credibility unless suppressed by facemask.

Authors:  Marco Marini; Fabio Paglieri; Alessandro Ansani; Fausto Caruana; Marco Viola
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  The Role of Gender in the Preconscious Processing of Facial Trustworthiness and Dominance.

Authors:  Haiyang Wang; Shuo Tong; Junchen Shang; Wenfeng Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-15

7.  Sensitivity to trustworthiness cues in own- and other-race faces: The role of spatial frequency information.

Authors:  Valentina Silvestri; Martina Arioli; Elisa Baccolo; Viola Macchi Cassia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Infants prefer a trustworthy person: An early sign of social cognition in infants.

Authors:  Yuiko Sakuta; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Parents reinforce the formation of first impressions in conversation with their children.

Authors:  Adam Eggleston; Cade McCall; Richard Cook; Harriet Over
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Beyond Likert ratings: Improving the robustness of developmental research measurement using best-worst scaling.

Authors:  Nichola Burton; Michael Burton; Carmen Fisher; Patricia González Peña; Gillian Rhodes; Louise Ewing
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.