Literature DB >> 28442242

Dosimetric analysis of liver toxicity after liver metastasis stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Aisling Barry1, Andrew McPartlin1, Patricia Lindsay2, Lisa Wang3, James Brierley1, John Kim1, Jolie Ringash1, Rebecca Wong1, Rob Dinniwell1, Tim Craig2, Laura A Dawson4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to describe the incidence and type of liver toxicity seen following liver metastases stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and the corresponding clinical and dosimetric factors associated with toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2002 and 2009, 81 evaluable patients with liver metastases were treated on 2 prospective studies assessing SBRT, with prescription doses based on the effective liver volume irradiated evaluated. Toxicity was defined as grade ≥2 classic or nonclassic radiation induced liver disease (RILD). Specific toxicity endpoints evaluated were worsening transaminases and albumin levels within 3 months of SBRT.
RESULTS: Seventy percent of patients had colorectal carcinoma, 55% had extrahepatic disease, 1 patient had hepatitis B, and 54% had received prior chemotherapy. Baseline transaminases were elevated at Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects, V4.0, grade 1, 2, and 3 levels in 33 (41%), 2 (2%), and 0 (0%) patients. The mean prescription dose was 43 Gy (27.7-60 Gy) in 6 fractions. The mean liver (minus gross tumor volume) dose (MLD) was 16 Gy (3-25.6 Gy) in 6 fractions. No classic or nonclassical ≥grade 2 RILD was observed. Within 3 months of SBRT, 49 (61%) patients had worsening of grade of transaminase and 23 (28%) patients had a reduction in albumin, all transient (majority grade ≤2 toxicity) without subsequent clinical toxicity. Seventeen patients exceeded Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic MLD guidelines (≤20 Gy), 13 (76%) of whom had worsening of transaminase grade. On multivariate analysis, worsening of liver enzymes was more likely in patients with higher doses to the spared 700 mL of liver (P = .026), and reduction of albumin was more likely with higher effective liver volume (odds ratio, 1.53 [range, 1.08-2.16]) P = .016).
CONCLUSIONS: Liver metastases SBRT is safe with a low risk of transient biochemical liver toxicity, more likely in patients with a higher effective liver volume and higher doses to the spared uninvolved liver volume.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28442242     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  3 in total

1.  Direct dose correlation of MRI morphologic alterations of healthy liver tissue after robotic liver SBRT.

Authors:  Judit Boda-Heggemann; Anika Jahnke; Mark K H Chan; Leila S Ghaderi Ardekani; Peter Hunold; Jost Philipp Schäfer; Stefan Huttenlocher; Stefan Wurster; Dirk Rades; Guido Hildebrandt; Frank Lohr; Jürgen Dunst; Frederik Wenz; Oliver Blanck
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Stereotactic body proton therapy for liver tumors: Dosimetric advantages and their radiobiological and clinical implications.

Authors:  W Tristram Arscott; Reid F Thompson; Lingshu Yin; Brendan Burgdorf; Maura Kirk; Edgar Ben-Josef
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-22

3.  Stereotactic MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for the treatment of liver metastases in oligometastatic patients: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Gamze Ugurluer; Teuta Zoto Mustafayev; Gorkem Gungor; Banu Atalar; Ufuk Abacioglu; Meric Sengoz; Fulya Agaoglu; Gokhan Demir; Enis Ozyar
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2021-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.