Literature DB >> 2844152

Influence of the phosphorylation state of neurofilament proteins on the interactions between purified filaments in vitro.

J Eyer1, J F Leterrier.   

Abstract

The extensive enzymic dephosphorylation of neurofilaments determined the progressive loss of their capacity to interconnect in vitro into a reticulated network, measured by the formation of highly viscous gels in purified preparations of neurofilaments [Leterrier & Eyer (1987) Biochem. J. 245, 93-101]. Conversely, a cyclic AMP-dependent activation of the gelation process was obtained by phosphorylation of the neurofilament proteins by the cyclic-nucleotide-dependent protein kinase added to the preparation. These findings argue for a direct relationship between the high phosphorylation level of the neurofilament subunits and the cross-bridging of the polymers in vitro. However, a transient stimulation of the neurofilament viscosity kinetics was also observed during the early steps of dephosphorylation with acid phosphatase, which, moreover, disappeared with longer incubation times before the net inhibition was obtained. In the same way, the calmodulin-dependent brain phosphatase, calcineurin, induced a permanent activation of the phenomenon, correlated with a low dephosphorylation capacity of the neurofilament molecules. Taken together, these results suggest a functional heterogeneity of the numerous phosphate groups of the neurofilament subunits and raise the hypothesis of a highly controlled regulation of the neurofilament cross-bridging by selective phosphorylation-dephosphorylation mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2844152      PMCID: PMC1149198          DOI: 10.1042/bj2520655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  24 in total

1.  Novel monoclonal antibodies provide evidence for the in situ existence of a nonphosphorylated form of the largest neurofilament subunit.

Authors:  V M Lee; M J Carden; J Q Trojanowski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Dephosphorylation of neurofilaments by exogenous phosphatases has no effect on reassembly of subunits.

Authors:  E Georges; S Lefebvre; W E Mushynski
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  The distribution of phosphorylation sites among identified proteolytic fragments of mammalian neurofilaments.

Authors:  J P Julien; W E Mushynski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1983-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Multiple phosphorylation sites in mammalian neurofilament polypeptides.

Authors:  J P Julien; W E Mushynski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Monoclonal antibodies distinguish phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of neurofilaments in situ.

Authors:  L A Sternberger; N H Sternberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stoichiometry and dynamic interaction of metal ion activators with calcineurin phosphatase.

Authors:  C J Pallen; J H Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-12-05       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Dephosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein 2, tau factor, and tubulin by calcineurin.

Authors:  S Goto; H Yamamoto; K Fukunaga; T Iwasa; Y Matsukado; E Miyamoto
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.372

8.  Differential turnover of phosphate groups on neurofilament subunits in mammalian neurons in vivo.

Authors:  R A Nixon; S E Lewis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1986-12-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Characteristics of the protein kinase activity associated with rat neurofilament preparations.

Authors:  J P Julien; G D Smoluk; W E Mushynski
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1983-01-04

10.  Neurofilament phosphorylation in development. A sign of axonal maturation?

Authors:  D Dahl; A Bignami
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.905

View more
  20 in total

1.  Relating interactions between neurofilaments to the structure of axonal neurofilament distributions through polymer brush models.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Xinghua Yin; Bruce D Trapp; Jan H Hoh; Michael E Paulaitis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Softness, strength and self-repair in intermediate filament networks.

Authors:  Oliver I Wagner; Sebastian Rammensee; Neha Korde; Qi Wen; Jean-Francois Leterrier; Paul A Janmey
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 3.905

3.  Microtubule-independent regulation of neurofilament interactions in vitro by neurofilament-bound ATPase activities.

Authors:  J F Leterrier; P A Janmey; J Eyer
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Neurofilaments bind tubulin and modulate its polymerization.

Authors:  Arnaud Bocquet; Raphael Berges; Ronald Frank; Patrick Robert; Alan C Peterson; Joël Eyer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of phosphorylation of the neurofilament L protein on filamentous structures.

Authors:  S Hisanaga; Y Gonda; M Inagaki; A Ikai; N Hirokawa
Journal:  Cell Regul       Date:  1990-01

6.  Phosphorylation-Induced Mechanical Regulation of Intrinsically Disordered Neurofilament Proteins.

Authors:  Eti Malka-Gibor; Micha Kornreich; Adi Laser-Azogui; Ofer Doron; Irena Zingerman-Koladko; Jan Harapin; Ohad Medalia; Roy Beck
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Neurofilaments at a glance.

Authors:  Aidong Yuan; Mala V Rao; Ralph A Nixon
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Mitogen-activated protein kinases (Erk1,2) phosphorylate Lys-Ser-Pro (KSP) repeats in neurofilament proteins NF-H and NF-M.

Authors:  N D Amin; N G Ahn; H Jaffe; C A Winters; P Grant; H C Pant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Differential effects of FK506 on structural and functional axonal deficits after diffuse brain injury in the immature rat.

Authors:  Ann Mae Dileonardi; Jimmy W Huh; Ramesh Raghupathi
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.685

10.  Preferential neuroprotective effect of tacrolimus (FK506) on unmyelinated axons following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Thomas M Reeves; Linda L Phillips; Nancy N Lee; John T Povlishock
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.