Literature DB >> 28441481

Best Practices of Computer-Aided Drug Discovery: Lessons Learned from the Development of a Preclinical Candidate for Prostate Cancer with a New Mechanism of Action.

Fuqiang Ban1, Kush Dalal1, Huifang Li1, Eric LeBlanc1, Paul S Rennie1, Artem Cherkasov1.   

Abstract

Small-molecule drug design is a complex and iterative decision-making process relying on pre-existing knowledge and driven by experimental data. Low-molecular-weight chemicals represent an attractive therapeutic option, as they are readily accessible to organic synthesis and can easily be characterized.1 Their potency as well as pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties can be systematically and rationally investigated and ultimately optimized via expert science behind medicinal chemistry and methods of computer-aided drug design (CADD). In recent years, significant advances in molecular modeling techniques have afforded a variety of tools to effectively identify potential binding pockets on prospective targets, to map key interactions between ligands and their binding sites, to construct and assess energetics of the resulting complexes, to predict ADMET properties of candidate compounds, and to systematically analyze experimental and computational data to derive meaningful structure-activity relationships leading to the creation of a drug candidate. This Perspective describes a real case of a drug discovery campaign accomplished in a relatively short time with limited resources. The study integrated an arsenal of available molecular modeling techniques with an array of experimental tools to successfully develop a novel class of potent and selective androgen receptor inhibitors with a novel mode of action. It resulted in the largest academic licensing deal in Canadian history, totaling $142M. This project exemplifies the importance of team science, an integrative approach to drug discovery, and the use of best practices in CADD. We posit that the lessons learned and best practices for executing an effective CADD project can be applied, with similar success, to many drug discovery projects in both academia and industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28441481     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  15 in total

Review 1.  QSAR without borders.

Authors:  Eugene N Muratov; Jürgen Bajorath; Robert P Sheridan; Igor V Tetko; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov; Tudor I Oprea; Igor I Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Adrian Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev; Stefano Curtarolo; Denis Fourches; Yoram Cohen; Alan Aspuru-Guzik; David A Winkler; Dimitris Agrafiotis; Artem Cherkasov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Identification and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the ubiquitin ligases Siah1/2 in melanoma and prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Yongmei Feng; E Hampton Sessions; Fan Zhang; Fuqiang Ban; Veronica Placencio-Hickok; Chen-Ting Ma; Fu-Yue Zeng; Ian Pass; David B Terry; Gregory Cadwell; Laurie A Bankston; Robert C Liddington; Thomas D Y Chung; Anthony B Pinkerton; Eduard Sergienko; Martin Gleave; Neil A Bhowmick; Michael R Jackson; Artem Cherkasov; Ze'ev A Ronai
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  Assessing and improving the performance of consensus docking strategies using the DockBox package.

Authors:  Jordane Preto; Francesco Gentile
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D₃R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Xinqiang Ding; Ryan L Hayes; Jonah Z Vilseck; Murchtricia K Charles; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Discovery of novel antagonists targeting the DNA binding domain of androgen receptor by integrated docking-based virtual screening and bioassays.

Authors:  Jin-Ping Pang; Chao Shen; Wen-Fang Zhou; Yun-Xia Wang; Lu-Hu Shan; Xin Chai; Ying Shao; Xue-Ping Hu; Feng Zhu; Dan-Yan Zhu; Li Xiao; Lei Xu; Xiao-Hong Xu; Dan Li; Ting-Jun Hou
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 7.169

6.  Deep Docking: A Deep Learning Platform for Augmentation of Structure Based Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Francesco Gentile; Vibudh Agrawal; Michael Hsing; Anh-Tien Ton; Fuqiang Ban; Ulf Norinder; Martin E Gleave; Artem Cherkasov
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 14.553

Review 7.  RORγ Structural Plasticity and Druggability.

Authors:  Mian Huang; Shelby Bolin; Hannah Miller; Ho Leung Ng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Empirical Scoring Functions for Structure-Based Virtual Screening: Applications, Critical Aspects, and Challenges.

Authors:  Isabella A Guedes; Felipe S S Pereira; Laurent E Dardenne
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Adverse drug reactions triggered by the common HLA-B*57:01 variant: virtual screening of DrugBank using 3D molecular docking.

Authors:  George Van Den Driessche; Denis Fourches
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 10.  Computer-Aided Ligand Discovery for Estrogen Receptor Alpha.

Authors:  Divya Bafna; Fuqiang Ban; Paul S Rennie; Kriti Singh; Artem Cherkasov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.