Literature DB >> 28441368

Skeletal Scintigraphy.

Jaime L Montilla-Soler1, Rikesh Makanji.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Skeletal scintigraphy remains a valuable tool in the initial and subsequent evaluation of the skeletal system in patients with a diagnosis of primary or metastatic neoplasms.
METHODS: We discuss radiopharmaceuticals, nuclear medicine imaging techniques, and current as well as future oncological applications in the adult population. Pertinent literature was reviewed to describe the advantages and limitations of available technologies for the evaluation of skeletal metastatic disease. Evaluation of primary and metastatic skeletal disease using nuclear medicine and positron emission tomography techniques is discussed.
RESULTS: Skeletal scintigraphy provides valuable information in the initial evaluation for the presence of osteoblastic skeletal metastases. Incremental advances on available radiopharmaceuticals (fludeoxyglucose F 18, sodium fluoride F 18), coupled with advances in imaging techniques and imaging devices (single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging), have had a significant impact on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates for the detection of skeletal metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal scintigraphy has a significant role in the initial diagnosis, staging, restaging, and treatment monitoring of patients with cancer and primary skeletal or metastatic disease. The coupling of diagnostic and therapeutic nuclear medicine agents in the setting of osteoblastic skeletal metastases is a valuable tool for the treatment for certain cancer types, including prostate cancer, and may become more widely used to treat other histologies as more data on other tumor types (eg, breast cancer, osteosarcoma) become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28441368     DOI: 10.1177/107327481702400206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Control        ISSN: 1073-2748            Impact factor:   3.302


  5 in total

1.  A phase IB and randomised phase IIA trial of CApecitabine plus Radium-223 (Xofigo™) in breast cancer patients with BONe metastases: CARBON trial results.

Authors:  Matthew Winter; Rob Coleman; Jessica Kendall; Carlo Palmieri; Chris Twelves; Sacha Howell; Iain MacPherson; Caroline Wilson; Kash Purohit; Jacqui Gath; Christine Taylor; Richard Eastell; Geraldine Murden; Sarah R Brown; Emma Rathbone; Janet Brown
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.491

Review 2.  Measuring the unmeasurable: automated bone scan index as a quantitative endpoint in prostate cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Jose Mauricio Mota; Andrew J Armstrong; Steven M Larson; Josef J Fox; Michael J Morris
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Comparison of 99mTc-methyl diphosphonate bone scintigraphy and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography to predict histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Inki Lee; Byung Hyun Byun; Ilhan Lim; Byung Il Kim; Chang-Bae Kong; Won Seok Song; Wan Hyeong Cho; Jae-Soo Koh; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment of Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Jozef Ban; Valerie Fock; Dave N T Aryee; Heinrich Kovar
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  FDG avid breast cancer bone metastases silent on CT and scintigraphy: a case report with radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Daniel Jeong; Marilyn Bui; Daniel Peterson; Jaime Montilla-Soler; Kenneth L Gage
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2017-10-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.