Literature DB >> 28441309

Trends, Complications, and Costs for Hospital Admission and Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Gustavo C Machado1, Chris G Maher1, Paulo H Ferreira2, Ian A Harris3, Richard A Deyo4, Damien McKay5,6, Qiang Li1, Manuela L Ferreira7.   

Abstract

MINI: Trends in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery are largely unknown outside of the United States. This population-based health record linkage study revealed that complex fusion surgery had a four-fold increase from 2003-2013 in Australia. This surgical procedure increased the risk of complications and resource use compared with decompression surgery alone. STUDY
DESIGN: Population-based health record linkage study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine trends in hospital admissions and surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, as well as complications and resource use in Australia. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In the United States, rates of decompression surgery have declined, whereas those of fusion have increased. It is unclear whether this trend is also happening elsewhere.
METHODS: We included patients 18 years and older admitted to a hospital in New South Wales between 2003 and 2013 who were diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis. We investigated the rates of hospital admission and surgical procedures, as well as hospital costs, length of hospital stay, and complications. Surgical procedures were: decompression alone, simple fusion (one to two disc levels, single approach), and complex fusion (three or more disc levels or a combined posterior and anterior approach).
RESULTS: The rates of decompression alone increased from 19.0 to 22.1 per 100,000 people. Simple fusion rates increased from 1.3 to 2.8 per 100,000 people, whereas complex fusion increased from 0.6 to 2.4 per 100,000 people. The odds of major complications for complex fusion compared with decompression alone was 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-10.1), although no significant difference was found for simple fusion (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI: 0.7-6.1). Mean hospital costs with decompression surgery were AU $12,168, whereas simple and complex fusion cost AU $30,811 and AU $32,350, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In Australia, decompression rates for lumbar spinal stenosis increased from 2003 to 2013. The fastest increasing surgical procedure was complex fusion. This procedure increased the risk of major complications and resource, although recent evidence suggest fusion provides no additional benefits to the traditional decompression surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28441309     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  How manual therapy provided a gateway to a biopsychosocial management approach in an adult with chronic post-surgical low back pain: a case report.

Authors:  David Toomey; Duncan Reid; Steven White
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2020-09-15

2.  Pain and disability after first-time spinal fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niek Koenders; Alison Rushton; Martin L Verra; Paul C Willems; Thomas J Hoogeboom; J Bart Staal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Accelerated Recovery Program for Patients with Polysegmental Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease.

Authors:  A A Kalinin; V Yu Goloborodko; V V Shepelev; Yu Ya Pestryakov; M Yu Biryuchkov; E E Satardinova; V A Byvaltsev
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2021-01-01

4.  Administrative Data Are Unreliable for Ranking Hospital Performance Based on Serious Complications After Spine Fusion.

Authors:  Jacob K Greenberg; Margaret A Olsen; John Poe; Christopher F Dibble; Ken Yamaguchi; Michael P Kelly; Bruce L Hall; Wilson Z Ray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Pain education for patients with non-specific low back pain in Nepal: protocol of a feasibility randomised clinical trial (PEN-LBP Trial).

Authors:  Saurab Sharma; Mark P Jensen; G Lorimer Moseley; J Haxby Abbott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Biomechanical Effect of L4 -L5 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Xin-Yi Cai; Meng-Si Sun; Yun-Peng Huang; Zi-Xuan Liu; Chun-Jie Liu; Cheng-Fei Du; Qiang Yang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Physiotherapy utilisation and costs before lumbar spine surgery: a retrospective analysis of workers compensation claims in Australia.

Authors:  Joshua R Zadro; Adriane M Lewin; Priti Kharel; Justine Naylor; Christopher G Maher; Ian A Harris
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Lumbar Fusion With Polyetheretherketone Rods Use for Patients With Degenerative Disease.

Authors:  Donald A Ross; Miner N Ross
Journal:  Fed Pract       Date:  2021-04

9.  [Study of modified subcutaneous lumbar spine index as a predictor for short-term effectiveness in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Yuzhu Xu; Pan Fan; Xuanfei Xu; Feng Jiang; Wei Zhang; Xiangjie Yin; Hang Liu; Peiyang Wang; Yuntao Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Biomechanical Stability of a Cross-Rod Connection with a Pedicle Screw System.

Authors:  Tetsutaro Mizuno; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Takamasa Yoshikawa; Tadashi Inaba; Takaya Kato; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  Med Sci Monit Basic Res       Date:  2018-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.