Literature DB >> 28441238

Diaphragm Activation in Ventilated Patients Using a Novel Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Pacing Catheter.

Steven Reynolds1, Adrian Ebner, Tracy Meffen, Viral Thakkar, Matt Gani, Kaity Taylor, Linda Clark, Gautam Sadarangani, Ramasamy Meyyappan, Rodrigo Sandoval, Elizabeth Rohrs, Joaquín A Hoffer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Over 30% of critically ill patients on positive-pressure mechanical ventilation have difficulty weaning from the ventilator, many of whom acquire ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction. Temporary transvenous phrenic nerve pacing using a novel electrode-bearing catheter may provide a means to prevent diaphragm atrophy, to strengthen an atrophied diaphragm, and mitigate the harms of mechanical ventilation. We tested the initial safety, feasibility, and impact on ventilation of this novel approach.
DESIGN: First-in-Humans case series.
SETTING: Angiogram suite. PATIENTS: Twenty-four sedated, mechanically ventilated patients immediately prior to an elective atrial septal defect repair procedure.
INTERVENTIONS: A 9.5-Fr central venous catheter with 19 embedded electrodes was placed via Seldinger technique into the left subclavian vein and superior vena cava and evaluated for up to 90 minutes. The electrode combinations determined to provide best transvenous stimulation of the right and left phrenic nerves were activated in synchrony with mechanically ventilated breaths.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One patient could not be tested for reasons unrelated to the device. In the 23 patients who underwent the full protocol, transvenous stimulation activated the diaphragm in 22 of 23 (96%) left phrenic capture attempts and 20 of 23 (87%) right phrenic capture attempts. In one subject, a congenital left-sided superior vena cava precluded right-sided capture. Significant reductions in ventilator pressure-time-product were achieved during stimulation assisted breaths in all 22 paced subjects (range, 9.9-48.6%; p < 0.001). There were no adverse events either immediately or at 2-week follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: In this First-in-Human series, diaphragm pacing with a temporary catheter was safe and effectively contributed to ventilation in conjunction with a mechanical ventilator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28441238     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  10 in total

1.  Restoring Ventilatory Control Using an Adaptive Bioelectronic System.

Authors:  Ricardo Siu; James J Abbas; Brian K Hillen; Jefferson Gomes; Stefany Coxe; Jonathan Castelli; Sylvie Renaud; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 2.  Ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction in critical illness.

Authors:  Yung-Yang Liu; Li-Fu Li
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2018-11-19

3.  Coronary sinus catheter placement via left cubital vein for phrenic nerve stimulation during pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Akio Chikata; Takeshi Kato; Kazuo Usuda; Shuhei Fujita; Michiro Maruyama; Kan-Ichi Otowa; Shin-Ichiro Takashima; Hisayoshi Murai; Soichiro Usui; Hiroshi Furusho; Shuichi Kaneko; Masayuki Takamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Temporary transvenous diaphragm pacing vs. standard of care for weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Douglas Evans; Deborah Shure; Linda Clark; Gerard J Criner; Martin Dres; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Franco Laghi; David McDonagh; Basil Petrof; Teresa Nelson; Thomas Similowski
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Autonomous control of ventilation through closed-loop adaptive respiratory pacing.

Authors:  Ricardo Siu; James J Abbas; David D Fuller; Jefferson Gomes; Sylvie Renaud; Ranu Jung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Phrenic nerve stimulation prevents diaphragm atrophy in patients with respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Michal Soták; Karel Roubík; Tomáš Henlín; Tomáš Tyll
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  Transvenous Diaphragm Neurostimulation Mitigates Ventilation-associated Brain Injury.

Authors:  Thiago G Bassi; Elizabeth C Rohrs; Karl C Fernandez; Marlena Ornowska; Michelle Nicholas; Matt Gani; Doug Evans; Steven C Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Initial Assessment of the Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation System in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation.

Authors:  James O'Rourke; Michal Soták; Gerard F Curley; Aoife Doolan; Tomáš Henlín; Gerard Mullins; Tomáš Tyll; William Omlie; Marco V Ranieri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Systematic review of cognitive impairment and brain insult after mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Thiago G Bassi; Elizabeth C Rohrs; Steven C Reynolds
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Clinical strategies for implementing lung and diaphragm-protective ventilation: avoiding insufficient and excessive effort.

Authors:  Ewan C Goligher; Annemijn H Jonkman; Jose Dianti; Katerina Vaporidi; Jeremy R Beitler; Bhakti K Patel; Takeshi Yoshida; Samir Jaber; Martin Dres; Tommaso Mauri; Giacomo Bellani; Alexandre Demoule; Laurent Brochard; Leo Heunks
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 41.787

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.