Literature DB >> 28441235

Noninvasive iPhone Measurement of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using Intrinsic Frequency Methodology.

Niema M Pahlevan1, Derek G Rinderknecht, Peyman Tavallali, Marianne Razavi, Thao T Tran, Michael W Fong, Robert A Kloner, Marie Csete, Morteza Gharib.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study is based on previously reported mathematical analysis of arterial waveform that extracts hidden oscillations in the waveform that we called intrinsic frequencies. The goal of this clinical study was to compare the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction derived from intrinsic frequencies noninvasively versus left ventricular ejection fraction obtained with cardiac MRI, the most accurate method for left ventricular ejection fraction measurement.
DESIGN: After informed consent, in one visit, subjects underwent cardiac MRI examination and noninvasive capture of a carotid waveform using an iPhone camera (The waveform is captured using a custom app that constructs the waveform from skin displacement images during the cardiac cycle.). The waveform was analyzed using intrinsic frequency algorithm.
SETTING: Outpatient MRI facility.
SUBJECTS: Adults able to undergo MRI were referred by local physicians or self-referred in response to local advertisement and included patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction diagnosed by a cardiologist.
INTERVENTIONS: Standard cardiac MRI sequences were used, with periodic breath holding for image stabilization. To minimize motion artifact, the iPhone camera was held in a cradle over the carotid artery during iPhone measurements.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Regardless of neck morphology, carotid waveforms were captured in all subjects, within seconds to minutes. Seventy-two patients were studied, ranging in age from 20 to 92 years old. The main endpoint of analysis was left ventricular ejection fraction; overall, the correlation between ejection fraction-iPhone and ejection fraction-MRI was 0.74 (r = 0.74; p < 0.0001; ejection fraction-MRI = 0.93 × [ejection fraction-iPhone] + 1.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of carotid waveforms using intrinsic frequency methods can be used to document left ventricular ejection fraction with accuracy comparable with that of MRI. The measurements require no training to perform or interpret, no calibration, and can be repeated at the bedside to generate almost continuous analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction without arterial cannulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28441235     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  6 in total

1.  Is your smartphone the future of physiologic monitoring?

Authors:  Frederic Michard; Borja Barrachina; Patrick Schoettker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Estimation of Wave Condition Number From Pressure Waveform Alone and Its Changes With Advancing Age in Healthy Women and Men.

Authors:  Niema M Pahlevan; Sohrab P Mazandarani
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Intrinsic Frequencies of Carotid Pressure Waveforms Predict Heart Failure Events: The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Leroy L Cooper; Jian Rong; Niema M Pahlevan; Derek G Rinderknecht; Emelia J Benjamin; Naomi M Hamburg; Ramachandran S Vasan; Martin G Larson; Morteza Gharib; Gary F Mitchell
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Artificial Intelligence Estimation of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity using Carotid Waveform.

Authors:  Peyman Tavallali; Marianne Razavi; Niema M Pahlevan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Intrinsic Frequency Analysis and Fast Algorithms.

Authors:  Peyman Tavallali; Hana Koorehdavoudi; Joanna Krupa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Proof-of-concept for a non-invasive, portable, and wireless device for cardiovascular monitoring in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Jennifer C Miller; Jennifer Shepherd; Derek Rinderknecht; Andrew L Cheng; Niema M Pahlevan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.