| Literature DB >> 28441085 |
Ewa Haman1, Magdalena Łuniewska1, Pernille Hansen2, Hanne Gram Simonsen2, Shula Chiat3, Jovana Bjekić4, Agnė Blažienė5, Katarzyna Chyl1, Ineta Dabašinskienė5, Pascale Engel de Abreu6, Natalia Gagarina7, Anna Gavarró8, Gisela Håkansson9, Efrat Harel10, Elisabeth Holm2, Svetlana Kapalková11, Sari Kunnari12, Chiara Levorato13, Josefin Lindgren14, Karolina Mieszkowska1, Laia Montes Salarich8, Anneke Potgieter15, Ingeborg Ribu2, Natalia Ringblom16, Tanja Rinker17, Maja Roch13, Daniela Slančová18, Frenette Southwood15, Roberta Tedeschi1, Aylin Müge Tuncer19, Özlem Ünal-Logacev20, Jasmina Vuksanović4, Sharon Armon-Lotem21.
Abstract
This article investigates the cross-linguistic comparability of the newly developed lexical assessment tool Cross-linguistic Lexical Tasks (LITMUS-CLT). LITMUS-CLT is a part the Language Impairment Testing in Multilingual Settings (LITMUS) battery (Armon-Lotem, de Jong & Meir, 2015). Here we analyse results on receptive and expressive word knowledge tasks for nouns and verbs across 17 languages from eight different language families: Baltic (Lithuanian), Bantu (isiXhosa), Finnic (Finnish), Germanic (Afrikaans, British English, South African English, German, Luxembourgish, Norwegian, Swedish), Romance (Catalan, Italian), Semitic (Hebrew), Slavic (Polish, Serbian, Slovak) and Turkic (Turkish). The participants were 639 monolingual children aged 3;0-6;11 living in 15 different countries. Differences in vocabulary size were small between 16 of the languages; but isiXhosa-speaking children knew significantly fewer words than speakers of the other languages. There was a robust effect of word class: accuracy was higher for nouns than verbs. Furthermore, comprehension was more advanced than production. Results are discussed in the context of cross-linguistic comparisons of lexical development in monolingual and bilingual populations.Entities:
Keywords: Lexical development; basic word classes; cross-linguistic comparison; word comprehension; word production
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28441085 DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1308553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Linguist Phon ISSN: 0269-9206 Impact factor: 1.346