Literature DB >> 28440943

Microplastics as a vector of hydrophobic contaminants: Importance of hydrophobic additives.

Jung-Hwan Kwon1, Sein Chang1, Sang Hee Hong2, Won Joon Shim2.   

Abstract

Despite a recent boom in research on the environmental fate, distribution, and harmful effects of chemical substances associated with marine plastic debris, no consensus has been reached on whether chemicals originating from microplastics cause serious environmental harm. For the risk assessment of chemical contaminants associated with microplastics, it would be useful to group organic chemicals into 2 categories: additives and nonadditives. Whereas plastic particles are not likely to be diffuse sources of chemicals that are not intentionally added to plastic products, continuous leaching of additives would result in higher concentrations, at least at a local scale. Unlike plasticizers and flame retardants, which have been relatively well investigated, antioxidants and photostabilizers have been rarely studied, even though many of them are highly hydrophobic and are not readily biodegradable. More research on the fate and effects of chemicals via microplastics should focus on those additives. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:494-499.
© 2017 SETAC. © 2017 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Additives; Antioxidants; Flame retardants; Microplastics; UV stabilizers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28440943     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  8 in total

1.  Polyvinyl Chloride Microplastics Leach Phthalates into the Aquatic Environment over Decades.

Authors:  Charlotte Henkel; Thorsten Hüffer; Thilo Hofmann
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 11.357

2.  A Relevant Screening of Organic Contaminants Present on Freshwater and Pre-Production Microplastics.

Authors:  Claudia Campanale; Georg Dierkes; Carmine Massarelli; Giuseppe Bagnuolo; Vito Felice Uricchio
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2020-11-09

3.  Effect of short-term exposure to fluorescent red polymer microspheres on Artemia franciscana nauplii and juveniles.

Authors:  Diogo Peixoto; Amparo Torreblanca; Susana Pereira; Maria Natividade Vieira; Inmaculada Varó
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Estimating the Bioaccumulation Potential of Hydrophobic Ultraviolet Stabilizers Using Experimental Partitioning Properties.

Authors:  Anh T Ngoc Do; Yoonsub Kim; Yeonjeong Ha; Jung-Hwan Kwon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Distribution Patterns of Microplastics Pollution in Urban Fresh Waters: A Case Study of Rivers in Chengdu, China.

Authors:  Juan Chen; Yinger Deng; Yong Chen; Xin Peng; Han Qin; Tao Wang; Chenchen Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Effects of Different Microplastics on Nematodes in the Soil Environment: Tracking the Extractable Additives Using an Ecotoxicological Approach.

Authors:  Shin Woong Kim; Walter R Waldman; Tae-Young Kim; Matthias C Rillig
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Microplastics in the Food Chain.

Authors:  Klára Cverenkárová; Martina Valachovičová; Tomáš Mackuľak; Lukáš Žemlička; Lucia Bírošová
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06

8.  Investigating zinc toxicity responses in marine Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus.

Authors:  Indrani Sarker; Lisa R Moore; Sasha G Tetu
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.777

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.