BACKGROUND: While clinicians are expected to routinely assess and address suicide risk, existing data provide little guidance regarding the significance of visit-to-visit changes in suicidal ideation. METHODS: Electronic health records from four large healthcare systems identified patients completing the Patient Health Questionnaire or PHQ9 at outpatient visits. For patients completing two questionnaires within 90 days, health system records and state vital records were used to identify nonfatal and fatal suicide attempts. Analyses examined how changes in PHQ9 item 9 responses between visits predicted suicide attempt or suicide death over 90 days following the second visit. RESULTS: Analyses included 430,701 pairs of item 9 responses for 118,696 patients. Among patients reporting thoughts of death or self-harm "nearly every day" at the first visit, risk of suicide attempt after the second visit ranged from approximately 2.0% among those reporting continued thoughts "nearly every day" down to 0.5% among those reporting a decrease to "not at all." Among those reporting thoughts of death or self-harm "not at all" at the first visit, risk of suicide attempt following the second visit ranged from approximately 0.2% among those continuing to report such thoughts "not at all" up to 1.2% among those reporting an increase to "nearly every day". CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of suicidal ideation between visits does imply a clinically important reduction in short-term risk, but prior suicidal ideation still implies significant residual risk. Onset of suicidal ideation between visits does not imply any special elevation compared to ongoing suicidal ideation. Risk is actually highest for patients repeatedly reporting thoughts of death or self-harm.
BACKGROUND: While clinicians are expected to routinely assess and address suicide risk, existing data provide little guidance regarding the significance of visit-to-visit changes in suicidal ideation. METHODS: Electronic health records from four large healthcare systems identified patients completing the Patient Health Questionnaire or PHQ9 at outpatient visits. For patients completing two questionnaires within 90 days, health system records and state vital records were used to identify nonfatal and fatal suicide attempts. Analyses examined how changes in PHQ9 item 9 responses between visits predicted suicide attempt or suicide death over 90 days following the second visit. RESULTS: Analyses included 430,701 pairs of item 9 responses for 118,696 patients. Among patients reporting thoughts of death or self-harm "nearly every day" at the first visit, risk of suicide attempt after the second visit ranged from approximately 2.0% among those reporting continued thoughts "nearly every day" down to 0.5% among those reporting a decrease to "not at all." Among those reporting thoughts of death or self-harm "not at all" at the first visit, risk of suicide attempt following the second visit ranged from approximately 0.2% among those continuing to report such thoughts "not at all" up to 1.2% among those reporting an increase to "nearly every day". CONCLUSIONS: Resolution of suicidal ideation between visits does imply a clinically important reduction in short-term risk, but prior suicidal ideation still implies significant residual risk. Onset of suicidal ideation between visits does not imply any special elevation compared to ongoing suicidal ideation. Risk is actually highest for patients repeatedly reporting thoughts of death or self-harm.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Christopher H Warner; Christopher Ivany; Maria V Petukhova; Sherri Rose; Evelyn J Bromet; Millard Brown; Tianxi Cai; Lisa J Colpe; Kenneth L Cox; Carol S Fullerton; Stephen E Gilman; Michael J Gruber; Steven G Heeringa; Lisa Lewandowski-Romps; Junlong Li; Amy M Millikan-Bell; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Anthony J Rosellini; Nancy A Sampson; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein; Simon Wessely; Alan M Zaslavsky; Robert J Ursano Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Matthew K Nock; Guilherme Borges; Evelyn J Bromet; Christine B Cha; Ronald C Kessler; Sing Lee Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: John F McCarthy; Robert M Bossarte; Ira R Katz; Caitlin Thompson; Janet Kemp; Claire M Hannemann; Christopher Nielson; Michael Schoenbaum Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christine Y Lu; Christine Stewart; Ameena T Ahmed; Brian K Ahmedani; Karen Coleman; Laurel A Copeland; Enid M Hunkeler; Matthew D Lakoma; Jeanne M Madden; Robert B Penfold; Donna Rusinak; Fang Zhang; Stephen B Soumerai Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Gregory E Simon; Karen J Coleman; Rebecca C Rossom; Arne Beck; Malia Oliver; Eric Johnson; Ursula Whiteside; Belinda Operskalski; Robert B Penfold; Susan M Shortreed; Carolyn Rutter Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Gregory E Simon; Eric Johnson; Jean M Lawrence; Rebecca C Rossom; Brian Ahmedani; Frances L Lynch; Arne Beck; Beth Waitzfelder; Rebecca Ziebell; Robert B Penfold; Susan M Shortreed Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Rebecca Owen; Steven H Jones; Robert C Dempsey; Patricia A Gooding Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Kevin Z Wang; Zanib Chaudhary; Jessica Qian; Christopher Adanty; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Philip Gerretsen; Clement C Zai; Vincenzo De Luca Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Date: 2022-04-27
Authors: Lisa M Horowitz; Annabelle M Mournet; Elizabeth Lanzillo; Jian-Ping He; Daniel S Powell; Abigail M Ross; Elizabeth A Wharff; Jeffrey A Bridge; Maryland Pao Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 7.830