Literature DB >> 28440741

Standardized Rat Model Testing Effects of Inflammation and Grafting on Extraction Healing.

Emily S Willett1, Jingpeng Liu1, Molly Berke1, Peter J Giannini1, Marian Schmid1, Zhenshan Jia2, Xiaobei Wang2, Xiaoyan Wang2, Kaeli Samson3, Fang Yu3, Dong Wang2, Ali Nawshad1, Richard A Reinhardt4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loss of alveolar ridge width and height after tooth extraction is well documented, but models to evaluate ridge preservation are neither standardized nor cost-effective. This rat model characterizes the pattern of bone turnover and inflammation after extraction and bone grafting with or without local simvastatin (SIM).
METHODS: Fifty retired-breeder rats underwent extraction of the maxillary right first molar and standard surgical defect creation under inhalation/local anesthesia. The left side of each animal served as unmanipulated control. Untreated groups (n = 8 to 9 per group) were compared (analysis of variance, t test) at days 0, 7, 14, and 28 for alveolar ridge height and width and for markers of inflammation and bone turnover by microcomputed tomography, histology, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Seventeen additional specimens had defects grafted with either bone mineralized matrix (BMM) or a BMM+SIM conjugate.
RESULTS: Extraction-induced bone loss (BL) was noted on buccal, palatal, and interproximal height (P <0.05) and ridge width (P <0.01). Week 1 inflammation positively correlated with ridge height; thereafter, a more intense inflammatory reaction corresponded to reduction in alveolar bone height and density (r = 0.74; P <0.05; Spearman). BMM+SIM preserved the most interproximal bone height (P <0.01), increased ridge width and bone density (P <0.01), enhanced 7-day prostaglandin E2 (P <0.01), and reduced 28-day inflammation density (P <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The standard defect used in the current study paralleled human postextraction alveolar BL. Defect grafting, especially BMM+SIM, reduced inflammation and preserved bone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone remodeling; inflammation; rats; tooth extraction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28440741     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.160771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  6 in total

1.  Scaffolds of bioactive glass (Bioglass®) combined with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein -9 (rhBMP-9) for tooth extraction site preservation.

Authors:  PeiKai Shi; WanTong Zhou; JingBo Dong; ShuJun Li; PengJun Lv; Chenxi Liu
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-01-19

2.  Polyphosphate-crosslinked collagen scaffolds for hemostasis and alveolar bone regeneration after tooth extraction.

Authors:  Jun-Ting Gu; Kai Jiao; Jing Li; Jian-Fei Yan; Kai-Yan Wang; Fu Wang; Yan Liu; Franklin R Tay; Ji-Hua Chen; Li-Na Niu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-26

3.  Decoronation-induced infected alveolar socket defect rat model for ridge preservation.

Authors:  Chih-Hsiang Fang; Hung-Ying Lin; Chung-Kai Sun; Yi-Wen Lin; Min-Chih Hung; Ching-Hung Li; I-Ping Lin; Hung-Chen Chang; Jui-Sheng Sun; Jenny Zwei-Chieng Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The Glycoprotein/Cytokine Erythropoietin Promotes Rapid Alveolar Ridge Regeneration In Vivo by Promoting New Bone Extracellular Matrix Deposition in Conjunction with Coupled Angiogenesis/Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Mirali Pandya; Matthew Saxon; John Bozanich; Connie Tillberg; Xianghong Luan; Thomas G H Diekwisch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  The Injectable Woven Bone-Like Hydrogel to Perform Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Adapted Remodeling Performance After Tooth Extraction.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Peng Xie; Zhenzhen Wu; Yunmao Liao; Wenchuan Chen; Zhichao Hao; Yushu Wang; Zhimin Zhu; Wei Teng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-21

6.  Endoplasmic reticulum stress remodels alveolar bone formation after tooth extraction.

Authors:  Yun Chen; Yue Guo; Jun Li; Ying-Yi Chen; Qiong Liu; Li Tan; Zheng-Rong Gao; Shao-Hui Zhang; Ying-Hui Zhou; Yun-Zhi Feng
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 5.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.