Literature DB >> 28440660

Implementation of Whole Slide Imaging for Clinical Purposes: Issues to Consider From the Perspective of Early Adopters.

Andrew J Evans, Mohamed E Salama, Walter H Henricks, Liron Pantanowitz1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: - There is growing interest in the use of digital pathology, especially whole slide imaging, for diagnostic purposes. Many issues need to be considered when incorporating this technology into a clinical laboratory. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) established a Digital Pathology Committee to support the development of CAP programs related to digital pathology. One of its many initiatives was a panel discussion entitled "Implementing Whole-Slide Imaging for Clinical Use: What to Do and What to Avoid," given for 3 years at the CAP annual meetings starting in 2014.
OBJECTIVES: - To review major issues to consider when implementing whole slide imaging for clinical purposes as covered during the panel discussion.
DESIGN: - The views expressed and recommendations given are based primarily on the personal experience of the authors as early adopters of this technology. It is not intended to be an exhaustive review of digital pathology.
RESULTS: - Implementation is best approached in phases. Early efforts are directed toward identifying initial clinical applications and assembling an implementation team. Scanner selection should be based on intended use and budget. Recognizing pathologist concerns over the use of digital pathology for diagnostic purposes, ensuring adequate training, and performing appropriate validation studies will enhance adoption. Once implemented, the transition period from glass slide to image-based diagnostics will be associated with challenges, especially those related to a hybrid glass slide-digital slide workflow.
CONCLUSIONS: - With appropriate preparation, planning, and stepwise implementation, whole slide imaging can be used safely and reliably for frozen sections, consultation, quality assurance, and primary diagnosis.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28440660     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0074-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  26 in total

1.  Implementation of Digital Pathology Offers Clinical and Operational Increase in Efficiency and Cost Savings.

Authors:  Matthew G Hanna; Victor E Reuter; Jennifer Samboy; Christine England; Lorraine Corsale; Samson W Fine; Narasimhan P Agaram; Evangelos Stamelos; Yukako Yagi; Meera Hameed; David S Klimstra; S Joseph Sirintrapun
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 2.  Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring.

Authors:  Michelle A Wood-Trageser; Andrew J Lesniak; Anthony J Demetris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Digital versus light microscopy assessment of surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Metka Volavšek; Ana Blanca; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng; Maria R Raspollini; Nuno Vau; Jorge Fonseca; Francesco Pierconti; Antonio Lopez-Beltran
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Remote Reporting from Home for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Tertiary Oncology Center Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Vidya Rao; Rajiv Kumar; Sathyanarayanan Rajaganesan; Swapnil Rane; Gauri Deshpande; Subhash Yadav; Asawari Patil; Trupti Pai; Santosh Menon; Aekta Shah; Katha Rabade; Mukta Ramadwar; Poonam Panjwani; Neha Mittal; Ayushi Sahay; Bharat Rekhi; Munita Bal; Uma Sakhadeo; Sumeet Gujral; Sangeeta Desai
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Dissecting the Business Case for Adoption and Implementation of Digital Pathology: A White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association.

Authors:  Giovanni Lujan; Jennifer C Quigley; Douglas Hartman; Anil Parwani; Brian Roehmholdt; Bryan Van Meter; Orly Ardon; Matthew G Hanna; Dan Kelly; Chelsea Sowards; Michael Montalto; Marilyn Bui; Mark D Zarella; Victoria LaRosa; Gerard Slootweg; Juan Antonio Retamero; Mark C Lloyd; James Madory; Doug Bowman
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-04-07

6.  Quantitative Image Analysis for Tissue Biomarker Use: A White Paper From the Digital Pathology Association.

Authors:  Haydee Lara; Zaibo Li; Esther Abels; Famke Aeffner; Marilyn M Bui; Ehab A ElGabry; Cleopatra Kozlowski; Michael C Montalto; Anil V Parwani; Mark D Zarella; Douglas Bowman; David Rimm; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2021-08-01

7.  Routine Digital Pathology Workflow: The Catania Experience.

Authors:  Filippo Fraggetta; Salvatore Garozzo; Gian Franco Zannoni; Liron Pantanowitz; Esther Diana Rossi
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-12-19

8.  Development of Whole Slide Imaging on Smartphones and Evaluation With ThinPrep Cytology Test Samples: Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Yu-Ning Huang; Xing-Chun Peng; Shuoxin Ma; Hong Yu; Yu-Biao Jin; Jun Zheng; Guo-Hui Fu
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Whole Slide Imaging Connectathon at Digital Pathology Association Pathology Visions 2017.

Authors:  David Clunie; Dan Hosseinzadeh; Mikael Wintell; David De Mena; Nieves Lajara; Marcial Garcia-Rojo; Gloria Bueno; Kiran Saligrama; Aaron Stearrett; David Toomey; Esther Abels; Frank Van Apeldoorn; Stephane Langevin; Sean Nichols; Joachim Schmid; Uwe Horchner; Bruce Beckwith; Anil Parwani; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-03-05

10.  Histopathology: ditch the slides, because digital and 3D are on show.

Authors:  Ilaria Jansen; Marit Lucas; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Sybren L Meijer; Henk A Marquering; Daniel M de Bruin; Patricia J Zondervan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.