Literature DB >> 28440562

The evolvability of herkogamy: Quantifying the evolutionary potential of a composite trait.

Øystein H Opedal1, Geir H Bolstad2, Thomas F Hansen3, W Scott Armbruster4,5, Christophe Pélabon1.   

Abstract

Accurate estimates of trait evolvabilities are central to predicting the short-term evolutionary potential of populations, and hence their ability to adapt to changing environments. We quantify and evaluate the evolvability of herkogamy, the spatial separation of male and female structures in flowers, a key floral trait associated with variation in mating systems. We compiled genetic-variance estimates for herkogamy and related floral traits, computed evolvabilities, and compared these among trait groups and among species differing in their mating systems. When measured in percentage of its own size, the median evolvability of herkogamy was an order of magnitude greater than the evolvability of other floral size measurements, and was generally not strongly constrained by genetic covariance between its components (pistil and stamen lengths). Median evolvabilities were similar across mating systems, with only a tendency toward reduction in highly selfing taxa. We conclude that herkogamy has the potential to evolve rapidly in response to changing environments. This suggests that the extensive variation in herkogamy commonly observed among closely related populations and species may result from rapid adaptive tracking of fitness optima determined by variation in pollinator communities or other selective factors.
© 2017 The Author(s). Evolution © 2017 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conditional evolvability; dead-end hypothesis; evolution of selfing; floral evolution; genetic variance; heritability; plant mating systems; pollination accuracy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28440562     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Intersexual conflict over seed size is stronger in more outcrossed populations of a mixed-mating plant.

Authors:  Astrid Raunsgard; Øystein H Opedal; Runa K Ekrem; Jonathan Wright; Geir H Bolstad; W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Fitness costs of delayed pollination in a mixed-mating plant.

Authors:  Laura S Hildesheim; Øystein H Opedal; W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Do annual and perennial populations of an insect-pollinated plant species differ in mating system?

Authors:  Yue Ma; Spencer C H Barrett; Fang-Yuan Wang; Jun-Chen Deng; Wei-Ning Bai
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Evolutionary Variation in MADS Box Dimerization Affects Floral Development and Protein Abundance in Maize.

Authors:  María Jazmín Abraham-Juárez; Amanda Schrager-Lavelle; Jarrett Man; Clinton Whipple; Pubudu Handakumbura; Courtney Babbitt; Madelaine Bartlett
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  The impact of floral morphology on genetic differentiation in two closely related biennial plant species.

Authors:  Arne Mertens; Rein Brys; Dorien Schouppe; Hans Jacquemyn
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  How early does the selfing syndrome arise? Associations between selfing ability and flower size within populations of the mixed-mater Collinsia verna.

Authors:  Robert M McElderry; Rachel B Spigler; Donna W Vogler; Susan Kalisz
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Modular regulation of floral traits by a PRE1 homolog in Mimulus verbenaceus: implications for the role of pleiotropy in floral integration.

Authors:  Hongfei Chen; Zheng Xiao; Baoqing Ding; Pamela K Diggle; Yao-Wu Yuan
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.291

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.