Literature DB >> 28440032

Discrepancies between the one-stage clotting assay and the chromogenic assay in haemophilia B.

K Kihlberg1, K Strandberg2, S Rosén3, R Ljung4, J Astermark1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Assay discrepancy in factor VIII activity between the one-stage and the chromogenic assays has been described in approximately one third of patients with non-severe haemophilia A. Whether assay discrepancy may also occur in patients with haemophilia B remains unknown. AIM: This study compared the results from the one-stage and the chromogenic assays in patients with haemophilia B.
METHODS: Plasma samples from patients with haemophilia B attending the haemophilia centre in Malmö, Sweden, were collected after a wash-out period of more than 7 days and analysed with both assays.
RESULTS: Fifty samples from 36 patients were analysed. No discrepancy was found in patients with severe haemophilia B. Among the 44 plasma samples from patients with non-severe disease, 15 showed a twofold or greater difference between the results of the two methods, with the chromogenic method presenting the higher value (mean FIX:Cone-stage 0.02 vs. FIX:Cchromo 0.06 IU mL-1 ). Of these 15 samples, 14 were from seven individuals from five families with the same mutated amino acid at the N-terminal cleaving site of the activation peptide (FIX: c.572G>A; p.Arg191His or FIX: c.571C>T; p.Arg191Cys). These mutations were not observed in any patients with non-discrepant results. The reported bleeding frequency for these patients was low and indicative of a mild bleeding phenotype.
CONCLUSION: Our findings imply that assay discrepancy occurs for factor IX activity and that both type of assays are needed for a correct diagnosis and classification of haemophilia B. The underlying mechanism by which the mutation influences the assays remains to be determined.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assay discrepancy; chromogenic assay; coagulation factor IX; haemophilia B; mutations; one-stage assay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28440032     DOI: 10.1111/hae.13219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  8 in total

1.  Cryptogenic oozers and bruisers.

Authors:  Kristi J Smock; Karen A Moser
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Non-Severe Hemophilia.

Authors:  Estera Boeriu; Teodora Smaranda Arghirescu; Margit Serban; Jenel Marian Patrascu; Eugen Boia; Cristian Jinca; Wolfgang Schramm; Adina Traila; Cristina Emilia Ursu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Assessing the Performance of Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factor VIII, FC Fusion Protein by Using Chromogenic and One-Stage Assays in Saudi Hemophilia A Patients.

Authors:  Tarek M Owaidah; Hazzaa A Alzahrani; Nouf S Al-Numair; Abdulmjeed O Alnosair; Amelita M Aguilos; Mahasen Saleh
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2020-09-09

4.  A field study evaluating the activity of N8-GP in spiked plasma samples at clinical haemostasis laboratories.

Authors:  Stefan Tiefenbacher; Wan Hui Ong Clausen; Martin Hansen; Rasmus Lützhøft; Mirella Ezban
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 5.  International consensus recommendations on the management of people with haemophilia B.

Authors:  Daniel P Hart; Davide Matino; Jan Astermark; Gerard Dolan; Roseline d'Oiron; Cédric Hermans; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Adriana Linares; Tadashi Matsushita; Simon McRae; Margareth C Ozelo; Sean Platton; Darrel Stafford; Robert F Sidonio; Andreas Tiede
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2022-04-02

Review 6.  Population pharmacokinetic modeling of factor concentrates in hemophilia: an overview and evaluation of best practice.

Authors:  Tine M H J Goedhart; Laura H Bukkems; C Michel Zwaan; Ron A A Mathôt; Marjon H Cnossen
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-10-26

7.  Hemophilia management: Huge impact of a tiny difference.

Authors:  Fabienne Kloosterman; Anne-Fleur Zwagemaker; Amal Abdi; Samantha Gouw; Giancarlo Castaman; Karin Fijnvandraat
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-02-28

Review 8.  An Update on Laboratory Diagnostics in Haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Jens Müller; Wolfgang Miesbach; Florian Prüller; Thomas Siegemund; Ute Scholz; Ulrich J Sachs
Journal:  Hamostaseologie       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.145

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.