Qian Wang1, Qiugen Wang1, Jiandong Wang2. 1. Department of Trauma Orthopaedics, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Unversity, No. 650, Xinsongjiang Rd, Songjiang District, 201620, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Trauma Orthopaedics, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Unversity, No. 650, Xinsongjiang Rd, Songjiang District, 201620, Shanghai, China. Jdwang1973@sina.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of anterior subcutaneous internal fixator using triple pedicle screws (ASIF/TPS) in the treatment of unstable type B pelvic fracture compared with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 26 patients with type B unstable fractures that underwent ASIF/TPS and 26 similar patients that underwent ORIF using plates and screws. Intraoperative blood loss, operating time, and post operation hospitalization duration were compared. Anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet X-rays and 3D computed tomography were obtained. Pain, numbness, sexual dysfunction, and activity were evaluated at every follow-up visit until the implants were removed. The Majeed score was used to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: Blood loss, operating time, and hospitalization duration were less (all P < 0.001) in the ASIF/TPS group compared with the ORIF group. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the ASIF/TPS group after a mean follow-up of 6 months were excellent and good in 80.8%, and moderate in 19.2%. In comparison, the results of the ORIF group were excellent and good in 65.4%, moderate in 29.0%, and poor in 5.6%. No patient experienced nonunion, delayed union, superficial infection, or deep surgical wound infection. No urethral injury or dysuria occurred in the ASIF/TPS group. Two patients had temporary lateral femoral cutaneous nerve numbness after operation. There were two superficial wound infections in the ORIF group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ASIF/TPS with triple pedicle screws could be a reasonable option for the treatment of type B unstable pelvic fractures.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of anterior subcutaneous internal fixator using triple pedicle screws (ASIF/TPS) in the treatment of unstable type B pelvic fracture compared with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 26 patients with type B unstable fractures that underwent ASIF/TPS and 26 similar patients that underwent ORIF using plates and screws. Intraoperative blood loss, operating time, and post operation hospitalization duration were compared. Anteroposterior, inlet, and outlet X-rays and 3D computed tomography were obtained. Pain, numbness, sexual dysfunction, and activity were evaluated at every follow-up visit until the implants were removed. The Majeed score was used to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: Blood loss, operating time, and hospitalization duration were less (all P < 0.001) in the ASIF/TPS group compared with the ORIF group. The clinical and radiological outcomes of the ASIF/TPS group after a mean follow-up of 6 months were excellent and good in 80.8%, and moderate in 19.2%. In comparison, the results of the ORIF group were excellent and good in 65.4%, moderate in 29.0%, and poor in 5.6%. No patient experienced nonunion, delayed union, superficial infection, or deep surgical wound infection. No urethral injury or dysuria occurred in the ASIF/TPS group. Two patients had temporary lateral femoral cutaneous nerve numbness after operation. There were two superficial wound infections in the ORIF group. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ASIF/TPS with triple pedicle screws could be a reasonable option for the treatment of type B unstable pelvic fractures.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anterior subcutaneous internal fixator; Complications; Triple pedicle screws; Type B pelvic fracture